Product Type
Condition
Binding
Collectible Attributes
Free Shipping
Seller Location
Seller Rating
Published by Diplom.de, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: medimops, Berlin, Germany
Book
Gut/Very good: Buch bzw. Schutzumschlag mit wenigen Gebrauchsspuren an Einband, Schutzumschlag oder Seiten. / Describes a book or dust jacket that does show some signs of wear on either the binding, dust jacket or pages.
Published by Verlag Herder 2018-08-20, 2018
ISBN 10: 3451380463ISBN 13: 9783451380464
Seller: Blackwell's, London, United Kingdom
Book
paperback. Condition: New. Language: GER.
Published by Diplom.De Okt 2000, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
Book Print on Demand
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Thesis (M.A.) from the year 1999 in the subject Business economics - Economic Policy, grade: 1,0, York University (Department of Politics), language: English, abstract: Inhaltsangabe:Abstract:The Awkward Partner (AP) Thesis is a widespread theoretical framework which explains why Britain has been called a semi-detached member of the European Union. This paper aims to take on the AP thesis by calling into question its basic tenets. To do this, the thesis claims and initially detectable flaws have to be set out explicitly. But the main challenge shall be launched by examining the Single European Act (SEA) in detail. Resulting contradictions and the implications of the findings require further answers: Should the AP thesis be abandoned If not, how can it be revised The argument advanced here is that the AP thesis presupposes a negative behaviour by UK governments vis-à-vis their European counterparts. This is explained by endogenous constraints that are imposed upon the core executive. These constraints are mainly caused by the divergence of domestic political forces. Slow and different rates of adaptation to the EU decision-making level are to be emphasised. While central government has already adjusted to the EU level, it attempts to retain its gatekeeper role between domestic and European political spheres. In contrast to the AP thesis, this paper shall show that in the run-up to the SEA Britain was not more negative than other member states. The UK representatives made proposals and concessions, as did everyone else.Despite the contradiction between theory and empirical study, it shall here not be concluded to abolish the AP thesis, but to amend it instead. First, the role of central government should be looked at in greater detail. Secondly, a link to Liberal Intergovernmentalism is proposed as a way forward. Some inconsistencies of the current framework could thereby be resolved. However, this would also mean to drop all negative connotations, if not the name, of the thesis.Zusammenfassung:Die These vom Unangenehmen Partner ist ein weit verbreitetes theoretisches Modell, das erklärt, warum Großbritannien oft als halbherziges Mitglied der Europäischen Union (EU) bezeichnet wird. Die folgende Studie will diese These dadurch angreifen, indem ihre grundlegenden Annahmen in Zweifel gezogen werden. Dazu müssen zuerst einmal die Kernaussagen sowie einige Unstimmigkeiten der These klar benannt werden. Die größte Herausforderung besteht allerdings darin, die Einheitliche Europäische Akte (EEA) genau zu untersuchen. Die gefundenen Widersprüche sowie deren Auswirkungen erfordern weitere Antworten: Sollte die These verworfen werden Wenn nicht, kann man sie überarbeiten Folgende Argumentation wird hier präsentiert: die These vom Unangenehmen Partner geht davon aus, dass das abweisende Verhalten britischer Regierungen gegenüber ihren europäischen Partnern zweifellos existiert. Dieses Verhalten wird mit innenpolitischen Beschränkungen erklärt, die der jeweiligen Regierung aufgezwungen werden. Diese Beschränkungen sind hauptsächlich im Auseinanderdriften der innenpolitischen Kräfte begründet. Langsame und unterschiedliche Anpassungsprozesse zum EU-Entscheidungsmechanismus werden dabei betont. Während die britische Zentralregierung sich bereits auf die EU-Ebene eingestellt hat, versucht sie gleichzeitig, ihre Rolle als Türsteher zwischen innenpolitischer und europäischer Sphäre zu bewahren. Im Gegensatz zur These vom Unangenehmen Partner zeigt diese Arbeit jedoch, dass Großbritannien in der Vorbereitungszeit zur Einheitlichen Europäischen Akte (EEA) nicht negativer war als andere Mitgliedsstaaten. Die britischen Vertreter machten Vorschläge und Konzessionen wie jeder andere Teilnehmer auch.Trotz des Widerspruches zwischen Theorie und Fallstudie soll daraus nicht folgen, die These vollkommen zu verwerfen. Sie muss jedoch verbesse. 88 pp. Englisch.
Published by Examicus Verlag, 2012
ISBN 10: 3869430257ISBN 13: 9783869430256
Seller: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Book
Condition: New.
Published by Grin Verlag, 2012
ISBN 10: 3869430257ISBN 13: 9783869430256
Seller: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
Book Print on Demand
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.
Published by Diplom.de, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
Book Print on Demand
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.
Published by Diplom.de, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Book
Condition: New.
Published by Diplom.De, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Book Print on Demand
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Thesis (M.A.) from the year 1999 in the subject Business economics - Economic Policy, grade: 1,0, York University (Department of Politics), language: English, abstract: Inhaltsangabe:Abstract:The Awkward Partner (AP) Thesis is a widespread theoretical framework which explains why Britain has been called a semi-detached member of the European Union. This paper aims to take on the AP thesis by calling into question its basic tenets. To do this, the thesis claims and initially detectable flaws have to be set out explicitly. But the main challenge shall be launched by examining the Single European Act (SEA) in detail. Resulting contradictions and the implications of the findings require further answers: Should the AP thesis be abandoned If not, how can it be revised The argument advanced here is that the AP thesis presupposes a negative behaviour by UK governments vis-à-vis their European counterparts. This is explained by endogenous constraints that are imposed upon the core executive. These constraints are mainly caused by the divergence of domestic political forces. Slow and different rates of adaptation to the EU decision-making level are to be emphasised. While central government has already adjusted to the EU level, it attempts to retain its gatekeeper role between domestic and European political spheres. In contrast to the AP thesis, this paper shall show that in the run-up to the SEA Britain was not more negative than other member states. The UK representatives made proposals and concessions, as did everyone else.Despite the contradiction between theory and empirical study, it shall here not be concluded to abolish the AP thesis, but to amend it instead. First, the role of central government should be looked at in greater detail. Secondly, a link to Liberal Intergovernmentalism is proposed as a way forward. Some inconsistencies of the current framework could thereby be resolved. However, this would also mean to drop all negative connotations, if not the name, of the thesis.Zusammenfassung:Die These vom Unangenehmen Partner ist ein weit verbreitetes theoretisches Modell, das erklärt, warum Großbritannien oft als halbherziges Mitglied der Europäischen Union (EU) bezeichnet wird. Die folgende Studie will diese These dadurch angreifen, indem ihre grundlegenden Annahmen in Zweifel gezogen werden. Dazu müssen zuerst einmal die Kernaussagen sowie einige Unstimmigkeiten der These klar benannt werden. Die größte Herausforderung besteht allerdings darin, die Einheitliche Europäische Akte (EEA) genau zu untersuchen. Die gefundenen Widersprüche sowie deren Auswirkungen erfordern weitere Antworten: Sollte die These verworfen werden Wenn nicht, kann man sie überarbeiten Folgende Argumentation wird hier präsentiert: die These vom Unangenehmen Partner geht davon aus, dass das abweisende Verhalten britischer Regierungen gegenüber ihren europäischen Partnern zweifellos existiert. Dieses Verhalten wird mit innenpolitischen Beschränkungen erklärt, die der jeweiligen Regierung aufgezwungen werden. Diese Beschränkungen sind hauptsächlich im Auseinanderdriften der innenpolitischen Kräfte begründet. Langsame und unterschiedliche Anpassungsprozesse zum EU-Entscheidungsmechanismus werden dabei betont. Während die britische Zentralregierung sich bereits auf die EU-Ebene eingestellt hat, versucht sie gleichzeitig, ihre Rolle als Türsteher zwischen innenpolitischer und europäischer Sphäre zu bewahren. Im Gegensatz zur These vom Unangenehmen Partner zeigt diese Arbeit jedoch, dass Großbritannien in der Vorbereitungszeit zur Einheitlichen Europäischen Akte (EEA) nicht negativer war als andere Mitgliedsstaaten. Die britischen Vertreter machten Vorschläge und Konzessionen wie jeder andere Teilnehmer auch.Trotz des Widerspruches zwischen Theorie und Fallstudie soll daraus nicht folgen, die These vollkommen zu verwerfen. Sie muss jedoch verbesse.
Published by Examicus Verlag Nov 2012, 2012
ISBN 10: 3869430257ISBN 13: 9783869430256
Seller: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
Book Print on Demand
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Thesis (M.A.) from the year 1999 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1.7, York University, language: English, abstract: The argument advanced here is that the AP thesis presupposes a negative behaviour by UK governments vis-à-vis their European counterparts. This is explained by endogenous constraints that are imposed upon the core executive. These constraints are mainly caused by the divergence of domestic political forces. Slow and differentrates of adaptation to the EU decision-making level are to be emphasised. While central government has already adjusted to the EU level, it attempts to retain its 'gatekeeper' role between domestic and European political spheres. In contrast to the AP thesis, thispaper shall show that in the run-up to the SEA Britain was not more negative than other member states. The UK representatives made proposals and concessions, as did everyone else. 84 pp. Englisch.
Published by Examicus Verlag, 2012
ISBN 10: 3869430257ISBN 13: 9783869430256
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Book Print on Demand
Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Fast Shipping from the UK. No. book.
Published by Examicus Verlag 2012-11-22, 2012
ISBN 10: 3869430257ISBN 13: 9783869430256
Seller: Chiron Media, Wallingford, United Kingdom
Book
Paperback. Condition: New.
Published by diplom.de, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Book Print on Demand
Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Fast Shipping from the UK. No. book.
Published by diplom.de 2000-10, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: Chiron Media, Wallingford, United Kingdom
Book
PF. Condition: New.
Published by Examicus Verlag, 2012
ISBN 10: 3869430257ISBN 13: 9783869430256
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Book Print on Demand
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Thesis (M.A.) from the year 1999 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1.7, York University, language: English, abstract: The argument advanced here is that the AP thesis presupposes a negative behaviour by UK governments vis-à-vis their European counterparts. This is explained by endogenous constraints that are imposed upon the core executive. These constraints are mainly caused by the divergence of domestic political forces. Slow and differentrates of adaptation to the EU decision-making level are to be emphasised. While central government has already adjusted to the EU level, it attempts to retain its 'gatekeeper' role between domestic and European political spheres. In contrast to the AP thesis, thispaper shall show that in the run-up to the SEA Britain was not more negative than other member states. The UK representatives made proposals and concessions, as did everyone else.
Published by GRIN Verlag|diplom.de, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: moluna, Greven, Germany
Book Print on Demand
Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Thesis (M.A.) from the year 1999 in the subject Business economics - Economic Policy, grade: 1,0, York University (Department of Politics), language: English, abstract: Inhaltsangabe:Abstract:The Awkward Partner (AP) Thesis is a widespread theoretical.
Published by Grin Verlag, 2012
ISBN 10: 3869430257ISBN 13: 9783869430256
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
Book Print on Demand
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.
Published by Diplom.de, 2000
ISBN 10: 3838628020ISBN 13: 9783838628028
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
Book Print on Demand
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.
Published by Examicus Verlag, 2012
ISBN 10: 3869430257ISBN 13: 9783869430256
Seller: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, United Kingdom
Book
paperback. Condition: Like New. LIKE NEW. book.