This specific ISBN edition is currently not available.View all copies of this ISBN edition:
Why did the Confederacy lose the Civil War? Most historians point to the larger number of Union troops, for example, or the North's greater industrial might. Now, in The South Vs. the South, one of America's leading authorities on the Civil War era offers an entirely new answer to this question.
William Freehling argues that anti-Confederate Southerners--specifically, border state whites and southern blacks--helped cost the Confederacy the war. White men in such border states as Missouri, Kentucky, and Maryland, Freehling points out, were divided in their loyalties--but far more joined the Union army (or simply stayed home) than marched off in Confederate gray. If they had enlisted as rebel troops in the same proportion as white men did farther south, their numbers would have offset all the Confederate casualties during four years of war. In addition, when those states stayed loyal, the vast majority of the South's urban population and industrial capacity remained in Union hands. And many forget, Freehling writes, that the slaves' own decisions led to a series of white decisions (culminating in the Emancipation Proclamation) that turned federal forces into an army of liberation, depriving the South of labor and adding essential troops to the blue ranks.
Whether revising our conception of slavery or of Abraham Lincoln, or establishing the antecedents of Martin Luther King, or analyzing Union military strategy, or uncovering new meanings in what is arguably America's greatest piece of sculpture, Augustus St.-Gaudens' Shaw Memorial, Freehling writes with piercing insight and rhetorical verve. Concise and provocative, The South Vs. the South will forever change the way we view the Civil War.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
William W. Freehling is Professor of History and Otis A. Singletary Chair in Humanities at the University of Kentucky, and is the author of The Road to Disunion, Volume I: Disunionists at Bay, 1776-1854, which won the Owsley Prize. He lives near Lexington, Kentucky.
"A rattling good read, Freehling's re-rendering of the Civil War overflows with compelling commentary on race and emancipation, military strategy and battlefield blunders, slave resistance, anti-Confederate dissent and much, much more. The South vs. the South may cover familiar terrain, but Freehling recasts conflicts from Sumter to Appomattox to showcase his scintillating insights and bracing originality. This enthralling narrative deserves a wide audience."--Catherine Clinton, author of Fanny Kemble's Civil Wars
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Book Description Oxford University Press, 2001. Hardcover. Condition: New. Dust Jacket Condition: New. 1st Edition. The South vs. The South: How Anti-Confederate Southerners Shaped the Course of the Civil War. Argues that anti-Confederate Southerners, Southern blacks, and border-state whites, influenced military outcomes by contributing thousands of troops to the Union cause as the border-states industrial economies developed. 1st edition. Oxford University Press, 2001. Hard cover in dust jacket. Language: eng. Seller Inventory # ABE-1509049601192
Book Description Oxford University Press, 2001. Hardcover. Condition: New. Never used!. Seller Inventory # P110195130278
Book Description Oxford University Press. Hardcover. Condition: New. 0195130278 New Condition. Seller Inventory # NEW7.0039868
Book Description Oxford University Press, USA, 2001. Hardcover. Condition: New. Seller Inventory # DADAX0195130278
Book Description Oxford University Press, 2001. Condition: New. book. Seller Inventory # M0195130278