Do Fewer Resources Mean Less Influence? A Comparative Historical Case Study of Military Influence in A Time of Austerity - Softcover
Synopsis
In the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review, military planners speak at great length about the importance of rebalancing our armed forces. As a result of the Budget Control Act of 2011, our U.S. Armed Forces have absorbed significant budget cuts, which are projected to continue into 2016. Not surprisingly, a major theme of the Quadrennial Defense Review is the necessity of making tough choices in a period of fiscal austerity.1 As Dr. Manjikian’s analysis points out, however, many of the themes raised by policymakers, military analysts and the general public in relation to this new politics of austerity are not actually new. Rather, such conversations have taken place at the end of U.S. military actions after the Korean War, in Vietnam, and at the end of the Cold War.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Other Popular Editions of the Same Title
Search results for Do Fewer Resources Mean Less Influence? A Comparative...
Seller Image
Do Fewer Resources Mean Less Influence? A Comparative Historical Case Study of Military Influence in A Time of Austerity
Print on DemandSeller: moluna, Greven, Germany
Seller rating 4 out of 5 stars
Kartoniert / Broschiert. Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. KlappentextIn the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review, military planners speak at great length about the importance of rebalancing our armed forces. As a result of the Budget Control Act of 2011, our U.S. Armed Forces have absorbed signi. Seller Inventory # 447479422
Buy New
US$ 28.59
Shipping:
US$ 56.80
From Germany to U.S.A.
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller Image
Do Fewer Resources Mean Less Influence? A Comparative Historical Case Study of Military Influence in A Time of Austerity
Print on DemandSeller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Seller rating 5 out of 5 stars
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review, militaryplanners speak at great length about the importance ofrebalancing our armed forces. As a result of the BudgetControl Act of 2011, our U.S. Armed Forces haveabsorbed significant budget cuts, which are projectedto continue into 2016. Not surprisingly, a major themeof the Quadrennial Defense Review is the necessity ofmaking tough choices in a period of fiscal austerity.1As Dr. Manjikian's analysis points out, howevermany of the themes raised by policymakers, militaryanalysts and the general public in relation to this newpolitics of austerity are not actually new. Rather, suchconversations have taken place at the end of U.S. militaryactions after the Korean War, in Vietnam, and atthe end of the Cold War. Seller Inventory # 9781312893580
Seller Image
Do Fewer Resources Mean Less Influence? A Comparative Historical Case Study of Military Influence in A Time of Austerity
Print on DemandSeller: preigu, Osnabrück, Germany
Seller rating 5 out of 5 stars
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Do Fewer Resources Mean Less Influence? A Comparative Historical Case Study of Military Influence in A Time of Austerity | Strategic Studies Institute (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2015 | [.] | EAN 9781312893580 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. Seller Inventory # 104835706