A relic can be anything from the past that has survived to the present. In some branches of the Christian Church, relics are more specifically either the bodily remains of the saints or their clothing, items they used, things they touched or which were touched to their remains, or things associated with the life of Christ or of his blessed mother. Throughout history, many people have venerated holy relics because the saints' bodies were temples of the Holy Spirit, through which each of them, in their own individual ways, channeled the presence of Christ to their contemporaries. In the early Christian era and in the Middle Ages, people believed that the aura and the energy of the saints continued to exude from their remains, even after their deaths. Just as people who knew the saints personally during their lifetimes often experienced them as radiating Christ's presence through the many ways they were a blessing to others, so honoring their remains and their images were considered valid ways of honoring them and of imploring their assistance.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
I. About Relics, 1,
II. Relics Of The Virgin Mary, 11,
III. Relic Theft, 16,
IV. France - Nuns Who Protected Relics, 21,
V. Belgium - Holland - Monks Who Protected Relics, 29,
VI. Why And How Have These Major Relics Become Available To St. Martha Church?, 50,
VII. Italy - Closed Palace Chapels, 81,
VIII. The Reformation, 85,
IX. Great Britain And Ireland, 87,
X. The Incorrupt Tongue Of St. John Nepomucene, 91,
XI. What We Can Learn From "False" Relics, 92,
XII. A Brief Walk Through St. Martha Shrine Of All Saints, 97,
Endnotes, 109,
Bibliography, 111,
About Relics
A relic can be anything from the past that has survived to the present. In some branches of the Christian Church, relics are more specifically either the bodily remains of the saints, or their clothing, items they used, things they touched or which were touched to their remains, or things associated with the life of Christ or of his Blessed Mother. Throughout history, many people have venerated holy relics, because the saints' bodies were temples of the Holy Spirit, through which each of them, in their own individual ways, channeled the presence of Christ to their contemporaries. In the early Christian era and in the Middle Ages, people believed that the aura and the energy of the saints continued to exude from their remains, even after their deaths. Just as people who knew the saints personally during their lifetimes often experienced them as radiating Christ's Presence through the many ways they were a blessing to others, so honoring their remains and their images were considered valid ways of honoring them and of imploring their assistance.
Considering that Jesus, his Mother, and his Apostles were all Jews and that, in his day, the mere touching of a dead body rendered one ritually unclean and unable to approach the Temple - and considering that they expected people to be buried by sundown on the day of death and left in sealed graves, how is it that the early Christians began to divide and to venerate bodily remains? For a short while, from the later first century until sometime in the second century, Jewish custom shifted a bit. Some wealthier Jews began exhuming the dead a few years after burial and placing their bones in special boxes called ossuaries. But there is little evidence that this had much impact on Christian customs. It seems rather that, with the Incarnation of Jesus and the realization that Jesus is truly God incarnate - the face of Jesus being the actual face of God - and with the growing Christian understanding that the Church is the mystical Body of Christ, rendering Christ present through the ages - both in the Eucharist and in the saints - Christians regarded each other as temples of the Holy Spirit and genuine channels of Christ to contemporaries. They revered the remains of their dead in a way which made it apparent that the remains were still somehow channels of divine life.
Why would God do such a messy thing as incarnating in the Person of Jesus? Divine Empathy is a big part of the answer. There is a difference between sympathy and empathy. A man may be able to sympathize with the pain a woman undergoes giving birth to a child, but he will never be able to empathize, because he will never go through the experience himself. With deep gratitude, Christianity revels in the fact that God loves humankind so very much that it was not enough for God to sympathize with the messy, frustrating, painful, often tortuous, sometimes violent, glorious, joyous hope-filled, deeply rewarding human struggle to get it right about living and about loving. God wanted to empathize. And the only way to do that was to become one of us and personally to go through the whole messy human process, even to the point of experiencing the violent death of an innocent Person. No matter how low life can get at times, no one can say that God doesn't "get it". God's Incarnation in Jesus rendered all of creation sacred. So it was considered a blessed act to cherish reminders of the many people and the places in whom and through which Incarnate God manifested to humankind. It was also, therefore, not only permissible but absolutely encouraged to attempt to depict Christ, Our Lady, and the other saints in icons, frescoes, and mosaics and to venerate their relics. Through fashioning representations of the Incarnate Christ, it was possible now even to visualize and to depict God.
The Incarnation continues throughout all of human history. St. Paul writes both about the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist and about all Christians together being the Body of Christ, from generation to generation. The great gift the Church continues to give the world is the real, tangible, consumable, transforming Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. And we are what we eat. We too become the tangible Presence of Christ to the world. So our bodies are sacred - most especially the bodies of the saints - those who got it so right about living and about loving - those who beautifully channeled Christ to their contemporaries.
One of the Apostolic Fathers of the Church perfectly understood the parallel and intimate relationship between the Eucharist and the bodies of the humans who constitute the Body of Christ on earth. St. Ignatius was the third bishop of Antioch, after St. Peter and St. Babylas. As a young man, he actually knew John the Evangelist, who spent his last years in Ephesus. And he carried the Johannine style and tradition in his writings. In the year 107, the Emperor Trajan visited Antioch and forced the Christians there to choose between death and apostasy. Ignatius refused to deny Christ; so he was condemned to die in Rome. During his journey to Rome, he wrote seven epistles. In his letter to the Romans, he wrote this, when he heard that there was a plot afoot to stop his martyrdom:
The only thing I ask of you is to allow me to offer the libation of my blood to God. I am the wheat of the Lord, may I be ground by the teeth of the beasts to become the immaculate bread of Christ.
Only one of Ignatius' seven epistles was addressed to an individual - his young disciple, Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna. The first recorded full account of a trial and martyrdom is that of the same Polycarp, who was burned at the stake in the year 156 in the amphitheatre in Smyrna (now Izmir). Through a letter written in 156 from the Church of Smyrna to the Church of Philomelium in Greater Phrygia, we possess a detailed account of Polycarp's heroic martyrdom which occurred probably February 22, 156. The author also recalls that
We afterwards took up his remains, more precious than costly stones, and more excellent than gold, and interred them in a decent place. There the Lord will permit us, as far as possible, to assemble in rapturous joy and celebrate his martyrdom - the day of his birth! (18:2)
The anniversaries of martyrs' deaths were among the first holy days celebrated by Christian communities.
The greatest of Polycarp's students was Irenaeus, who became bishop of Lyons, France, and was the most important of the theologians of the second century. His home was in Asia Minor, probably Smyrna. In his Ecclesiastical History (5,20,5-7), Eusebius of Caesarea quoted a letter Irenaeus sent to the Roman presbyter Florinus:
For when I was a boy, I knew you (Florinus) in lower Asia, in Polycarp's house, when you were a man of rank in the royal hall, and endeavoring to stand well with him. I remember the events of those days more clearly than those which happened recently, for what we learn as children grows up with the soul and is united to it, so that I can speak even of the place in which the blessed Polycarp sat and disputed, how he came in and went out, the character of his life, the appearance of his body, the discourses which he made to the people, how he reported his intercourse with John and with the others who had seen the Lord, how he remembered their words, and what were the things concerning the Lord which he had heard from them, and about their miracles, and about their teachings, and how Polycarp had received them from the eye-witnesses of the word of Life, and reported all things in agreement with the Scriptures. I listened eagerly even then to these things through the mercy of God which was given me, and made notes of them, not on paper, but in my heart, and ever by the grace of God do I truly ruminate on them.
Irenaeus was so convinced of the Real Presence of the Body and Blood of Christ in the Eucharist, the he derived the resurrection of the human body from the fact that the body has been nourished by the eternally alive Body and Blood of the Lord. He wrote about it extensively in his five volume Adversus Haereses. Irenaeus was the last in a chain of witnesses who were raised on the teachings of John the Evangelist. His love of the Incarnate Savior and his appreciation of God's unconditional love for humankind led him to declare that
The Glory of God is a human person fully alive: moreover a person's life is the vision of God: if God's revelation through creation has already obtained life for all the beings that dwell on earth, how much more will the Word's manifestation of the Father obtain life for those who see God.
It is unknown when Irenaeus died. It was some time after the year 200. There are substantial relics of Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, and Irenaeus in the St. Martha Church.
These Fathers of the Church lived and died during the period of persecution, which extended from the Emperor Nero's blaming of the Christians for the burning of a good portion of the city of Rome in 64 A.D. (something for which he himself was responsible) to the Edict of Milan, issued by the Emperor Constantine I in the year 313. This is the period which produced most of the great, universally revered martyrs of the Church. In the city of Rome, most of them were buried in the catacombs. St. Peter was buried in the cemetery on Vatican hill, and St. Paul was buried outside the city walls.
A significant development in the middle of the third century, which, at the time of the Reformation, would be related to the veneration of relics, was the practice of issuing indulgences. In the first place, indulgences were living Christians obtaining reprieve of the punishment decreed for also living fellow Christians. It had nothing to do with the dead. The reason the custom began is this.
Persecution was not something that went on continually. It depended upon who was sitting on the Imperial throne and upon the whim of local authorities throughout the Roman Empire. Persecutions flared up periodically. When they did flare up, they were often severe and produced a lot of suffering and death. The martyrs were the men and women who bore heroic witness to their faith by giving their lives for Christ. Many others were imprisoned and tortured. But they were not the majority of Christians. Many others either hid successfully, or pretended they had denied Christ, or persuaded officials to give them tokens of verification that they had denied Christ or even, actually offered public sacrifice to the pagan gods and goddesses. When the persecutions toned down, many of these people regretted what they had done and begged their bishops to forgive them and reconcile them to the Church. This occasioned the problem of what impact quick reconciliation would have on the other fellow Christians who had been faithful had often suffered greatly either from the loss of property or of loved ones, from torture, and from spending time in prison. They were likely to resent the dispensing of cheap, easy grace to the guilty. Also there was the question of how sincere the regret was in the hearts of the penitents. So the bishop imposed upon them severe public penances, which could go on for years, or, in some places, for the duration of their lives. These penitents would fast for years and kneel outside the churches, begging fellow Christians to pray for them. Eventually, by their manifestly sincere regret, some of these penitents had made it clear to everyone that they were truly, deeply sorry. Then, sometimes, a Christian who was known to have personally suffered or to have lost loved ones during the persecutions would write a letter to the bishop, begging him to lift the penance and restore a particular penitent to the community of the faithful. The bishop would then read the letter to all present during the liturgy and announce that, for the sake of the heroism of the writer of the letter, he would remit the sentence of the penitent. This letter brought about the indulgence (i.e. the remitted sentence).
The earliest recorded intentional quest for holy relics - indeed the first archaeological dig in recorded history - involved the search for and recovery of the True Cross of Christ and of other relics associated with His Passion and death. Eusebius of Caesarea, in his Life of Constantine, describes how the site of the Holy Sepulchre, originally a place of veneration for the Christian community in Jerusalem, had been covered with earth, and a temple of Venus had been built on the top. Although Eusebius does not say so, this was probably done as part of Hadrian's reconstruction of Jerusalem as Aelia Capitolina in 135, following the destruction during the Jewish Revolt of 70 and Bar Kokhba's revolt of 132-35. After ending the persecutions of the Church, in about 325-26, Emperor Constantine ordered that the site be uncovered and instructed Saint Macarius, Bishop of Jerusalem, to build a church on the site. Eusebius does not mention the finding of the True Cross. However Socrates Scholasticus (born c. 380), in his Ecclesiastical History does tell the full story, which was repeated by later historians Sozomen and Theodoret. It was St. Helena, Constantine's mother, who had the temple of Venus destroyed and the Holy Sepulchre uncovered, whereupon three crosses and the titulus (sign board) from Jesus' crucifixion were uncovered as well. Socrates mentions that Macarius had the three crosses placed in turn on a deathly ill woman. She recovered at the touch of the third cross, which was judged to be the cross of Jesus.
According to Theodoret, Helena took the relics back with her to Constantinople. "She had part of the cross of our savior conveyed to the palace. The rest she enclosed in a covering of silver, and committed to the care of the bishop of the city, whom she exhorted to preserve it carefully, in order that it might be transmitted uninjured to posterity." It is certain that the Basilica of the Holy Sepulchre was completed by 335. St. Cyril of Jerusalem, in his Catecheses (348), mentions that relics of the Cross were being venerated there by the 340s. Around the year 455, Patriarch Juvenal of Jerusalem sent to Pope Leo the Great a fragment of the "precious wood", according to one of the Letters of Pope Leo I. A portion of the cross was taken to Rome in the seventh century by Pope Sergius I, who was of Byazntine origin. The relics of the Cross, the titulus, and other relics associated with the Lord's Passion are exposed for veneration in Rome's Basilica of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem, originally built in 325 around the room in St. Helena's Sessorian Palace, which she had turned into a chapel and in which she venerated the relics of the Holy Cross, which she brought to Rome. The basilica was called "in Jerusalem" because she had the floor covered with soil from Jerusalem. The relics of the Holy Cross in Constantinople were taken from the city during its looting by the soldiers the Fourth Crusade in 1204. There are several relics of the Holy Cross in St. Martha Church. One of them is fixed to the center of the cross beam on the cross used during solemn veneration on Good Friday.
Emperor Constantine I dedicated the Church of the Holy Apostles in Constantinople in the year 330. It was originally his desire to gather into this church the relics of all the apostles. He eventually succeeded in obtaining the bodies of Andrew (in 356), Luke (in 356), and Timothy (in 358). But the church, which became his own burial place and the place of repose of all his successors, was also gradually filled up with many other relics, among them the remains of Patriarchs Gregory Nazianzen, John Chrysostom, and other Church Fathers, saints, and martyrs. To protect it from the ravages of the Iconoclastic heresy, Luke's body was transferred to the Basilica of St. Justina in Padua. As a result of the looting after the Fourth Crusade, the body of Andrew was placed in the Cathedral of Amalfi in 1210. His skull ended up in Rome in 1462, brought from Patras and given to the Pope by Thomas Paleologus, Governor of Moraea and brother of the last Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI, when he fled Moraea after it was conquered by the Turks. Timothy's relics are now in Rome, in San Giovanni in Fonte church. After the Fourth Crusade, the bodies of Gregory Nazianzen and John Chrysostom ended up in St. Peter's in Rome. In a gesture of outreach and reconciliation, Pope Paul VI returned the skull of St. Andrew and one of his fingers to Metropolitan Constantine of Patras in September 26, 1964. Patras is where St. Andrew died and was originally buried. In a further gesture of ecumenical outreach, Pope John Paul II returned the bodies of Gregory Nazianzen and John Chrysostom to Patriarch Bartholomew on November 27, 2004. Thus the major significance and regard with which people honor and treasure relics extends into the twenty-first century. There are significant sized relics of Sts. Andrew, Luke, Timothy, Gregory Nazianzus, John Chrysostom, and Justina of Padua in St. Martha Church.
There were two other churches in Constantinople particularly famous for their relics. The cathedral of Hagia Sophia (Holy Wisdom), first dedicated by Constantius II 360. The present cathedral - now a museum - was built and dedicated by Emperor Justinian I on December 24, 537. Among its most famous relics were the Holy Shroud (of Turin), parts of the Holy Sepulchre, of the True Cross, the Crown of Thorns, the Spear of Longinus the Centurion, the Nails, and the Holy Face of Edessa ("not made by human hands" i.e. the Face of Christ supposedly imprinted by the Savior on a cloth and sent via St. Jude Thaddeus to King Abgar of Edessa), and the bones of many saints.
Excerpted from Relics in the Shrine of All Saints at St. Martha of Bethany Church in Morton Grove, Illinois by Dennis B. O'Neill. Copyright © 2015 Dennis B. O'Neill. Excerpted by permission of Trafford Publishing.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: BooksRun, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condition: Good. It's a preowned item in good condition and includes all the pages. It may have some general signs of wear and tear, such as markings, highlighting, slight damage to the cover, minimal wear to the binding, etc., but they will not affect the overall reading experience. Seller Inventory # 1490763171-11-1
Seller: Goodwill of Greater Milwaukee and Chicago, Racine, WI, U.S.A.
Condition: acceptable. Book is considered to be in acceptable condition. The actual cover image may not match the stock photo. Book may have one or more of the following defects: noticeable wear on the cover dust jacket or spine; curved, dog eared or creased page s ; writing or highlighting inside or on the edges; sticker s or other adhesive on cover; CD DVD may not be included; and book may be a former library copy. Seller Inventory # SEWV.1490763171.A
Seller: Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, U.S.A.
paperback. Condition: Very Good. Seller Inventory # mon0003719640
Seller: Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, U.S.A.
paperback. Condition: Fine. Seller Inventory # mon0003716117
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition. Seller Inventory # 24531618
Seller: Kubik Fine Books Ltd., ABAA, Dayton, OH, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condition: As New. First Edition, First Printing. 112p. A large softcover book in fine condition. Illustrated with a section of color photographs of the relics. Measures approx. 11" x 8.5". Seller Inventory # 195621
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 24531618-n
Seller: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # L0-9781490763170
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # L0-9781490763170
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: Chiron Media, Wallingford, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 6666-IUK-9781490763170
Quantity: 10 available