Finding "The Right Way" : Toward an Army Institutional Ethic (Carlisle Paper)

Lieutenant Colonel Clark C. Barrett, U. S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute

ISBN 10: 130407403X / ISBN 13: 9781304074034

Published by Lulu.com, 2013

About this Item

Zustand: Hervorragend | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | The ethical lapses exemplified by Abu Ghraib, Mahmudiyah (Blackhearts), and Maywand (5/2 Stryker) are distressing symptoms of an even bigger, and potentially devastating, cultural shortcoming. The U.S. Army profession lacks an institution l ethical framework and a means of peer-to-peer self-governance. The frameworks the Army has may imply , but they do not explicitly dictate, an Army ethic. Other English-speaking g nations' ethical constructs can inform the development of an Army Ethic which serves to protect our organizational and individual honor from moral and ethical lapses which do great harm to the institution, undermine the American public trust, and hinder mission accomplishment. This Paper describes the problem, provides a review of literature, including current Army artifacts, reviews partner nation military ethics, and sketches the necessary philosophical underpinnings. The Paper also addresses the importance of promulgation, non-toleration, and the necessity for the Army to act as a learning.

Seller Inventory # 38212112/1

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Finding "The Right Way" : Toward an Army Institutional Ethic (Carlisle Paper)
• Publisher: Lulu.com
• Publication Date: 2013
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 130407403X
• ISBN 13: 9781304074034
• Binding: Soft cover
• Condition: Hervorragend
• Seller catalogs:
  • Bücher

About this title

Synopsis

The ethical lapses exemplified by Abu Ghraib, Mahmudiyah (Blackhearts), and Maywand (5/2 Stryker) are distressing symptoms of an even bigger, and potentially devastating, cultural shortcoming. The U.S. Army profession lacks an institution l ethical framework and a means of peer-to-peer self-governance. The frameworks the Army has may imply , but they do not explicitly dictate, an Army ethic. Other English-speaking g nations’ ethical constructs can inform the development of an Army Ethic which serves to protect our organizational and individual honor from moral and ethical lapses which do great harm to the institution, undermine the American public trust, and hinder mission accomplishment. This Paper describes the problem, provides a review of literature, including current Army artifacts, reviews partner nation military ethics, and sketches the necessary philosophical underpinnings. The Paper also addresses the importance of promulgation, non-toleration, and the necessity for the Army to act as a learning...