Show results for
Product Type
Refine by
Condition
Binding
Collectible Attributes
Free Shipping
Seller Location
Seller Rating
Published by [Badenweiler (1964)
Quantity Available: 1
From: SOPHIA RARE BOOKS (Koebenhavn V, Denmark)
About this Item: [Badenweiler, 1964. A remarkable, wide-ranging and apparently unpublished manuscript by the great German physicist and Nobel laureate Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976), creator of quantum mechanics and formulator of the uncertainty principle, providing a broad conspectus of the development of the theory of elementary particles. Heisenberg references Plato, Newton, Bohr and Einstein, and concludes by propounding a ?Platonic? vision of particles as ?mathematical forms.? Of particular interest are his references to Einstein?s attempts at a unified field theory and his closing philosophical observations and prognostications for the future of his field. The lecture was delivered on March 5, 1964 on the occasion of the presentation to Heisenberg of an honorary doctorate by the Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.In part: ?Einstein's Versuche einer einheitlichen Feldtheorie. Argumente:.Elekt., Gravitat., aber doch nicht völlig getrennt. Zurück zu Newton. Kritik: geht nicht ohne Quantumtheorie. Jetzt sehr viele Felder. Aber Vereinheitlichung notwendig. Spektrum d. E.F. Einheitl. "Feldtheorie" = einheitl. Teilchentheorie = einh. Krafttheorie etc.Beispiele aus der Mathematik: Arithmatik, Geomatrie, Analysis u.s.w.Begriff der abgeschlossenen Theorie. Newtons Physik konnte nicht verbessert werden.Schluss. Philosophische Interpretation. Wandlung der Bilder, die sich die Physiker machen.Die kleinsten Teile sind "mathematischen Formen". Bei Plato . In unserer Zeit: Einbeziehung der Zeit in die Symmetrien. Aber entscheidend: solche Fragen, die 2500 Jahre alt sind, werden heute wirklich entschieden. Schon in wenigen Jahren werden wir wissen, wie die Struktur der Welt im Keinsten ist. Ich vermute, dass sie sehr platonisch ist .?In free translation: ?Einstein's attempts at a unified field theory. Arguments: Electricity, gravitation, but not completely separated. Back to Newton. Criticism: does not go without quantum theory. Now a lot of fields. But unification is necessary ? Particle theory = Unified theory of force, etc. Examples from mathematics: Arithmetic, geometry, analysis, etc. Conception of the theory. Newton's physics could not be improved. Philosophical interpretation. Transformation of the images made by the physicists . The smallest parts are "mathematical forms" after Plato . In our time: Incorporating time into the symmetries. But decidedly: such questions that are 2500 years old shall now actually be settled. Within a few years we will understand the structure of the world in the smallest parts . that will be settled by experimental physicists." A full English translation is available.?Faced with his own mortality and the likelihood that he would never regain the stature he had once enjoyed, Heisenberg now increasingly attempted to place his life?s work in a permanent intellectual tradition. His fiftieth, fifty-fifth, and sixtieth birthdays brought him renewed concerns about his advancing age and his ability to continue first-rate physics. Under the influence of his long-time friend and colleague Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, his preferred intellectual tradition derived from ancient Greek philosophy. One former student recalled that Weizsäcker and Heisenberg began every lecture course, no matter what the subject, with a reference to Greek philosophy.?By the winter of 1955-1956, when Heisenberg delivered the Gifford Lectures on physics and philosophy at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, he had already distinguished contemporary elementary particle physics from nineteenth-century atomism. For him, the latter was a form of repugnant mechanistic materialism derived from the atomic theories of Democritus and Leucippus; the former held closest affinity to the work of the sagacious Aristotle. The underlying matter field of Heisenberg?s unified field theory bore similarities to the notion of substance in Aristotelianism, an intermediate type of reality. Measuring the properties of elementary particles seemed closest to the Aristotelian notion of potenti. Seller Inventory # 4147
Quantity Available: 1
From: Lynge & Søn ILAB-LILA (Copenhagen, Denmark)
About this Item: (Leipzig, Johann Ambrosius Barth), 1924. 8vo. As issued. Offprint from "Annalen der Physik" IV. Folge, Bd. 74, 1924. With the author's presentation inscription to upper right corner of first leaf: "Hrn. Dr. Faxeén mit / best. Empfehl. d. verf.". Stapled spine with rust slightly affecting surrounding paper. A very fine and clean copy. Pp. (1), 578-627. First edition in the exceedingly rare offprint - with a most attractive presentation-inscription from Heisenberg to Swedish Hilding Faxén, an important contributor to the field - of Heisenberg's doctoral dissertation on the stability and turbulence of fluid flow, which "involved an approximate solution of the complicated equations governing the onset of hydrodynamic turbulence"(David C. Cassidy). It is widely regarded as being "the most important early paper devoted to this subject". (Yaglom, Hydrodynamics Instability and Transition to Turbulence).Hilding Faxén (1892 - 1970), Swedish physicist, received his doctorate in 1921 at Uppsala University with his thesis on "the influence of the container walls on the resistance against movement by a small ball in a viscous fluid". He formulated several basic equations mainly in hydrodynamics; the Faxén integral, the Faxén laws, the Faxén theorems and the Faxén-Waller theory.Heisenberg and Faxén most likely meet at the Institute of Theoretical Physics at the University of Copenhagen (Directed by Niels Bohr) where Heisenberg, From 17 September 1924 to 1 May 1925, studied under an International Education Board Rockefeller Foundation fellowship. Despite Sommerfeld positive evaluation of Heisenberg's thesis "In the handling of the present problem, Heisenberg shows once again his extraordinary abilities: complete command of the mathematical apparatus and daring physical insight" (Arnold Sommerfeld, evaluation of the thesis, 1923.) the oral presentation did not go as Heisenberg could have hoped for:":Acceptance of the dissertation brought admission of the candidate to the final orals, where in this case trouble began. The examining committee consisted of Sommerfeld and Wien, along with representatives in Heisenberg's two minor subjects, mathematics and astronomy. Much was at stake, for the only grades a candidate received were those based on the dissertation and final oral: one grade for each subject and one for overall performance. The grades ranged from I (equivalent to an A) to V (an F).As the 21-year-old Heisenberg appeared before the four professors on July 23, 1923, he easily handled Sommerfeld's questions and those in mathematics, but he began to stumble on astronomy and fell flat on his face on experimental physics. In his laboratory work Heisenberg had to use a Fabry-Perot interferometer, a device for observing the interference of light waves, on which Wien had lectured extensively. But Heisenberg had no idea how to derive the resolving power of the interferometer nor, to Wien's surprise, could he derive the resolving power of such common instruments as the telescope and the microscope. When an angry Wien asked how a storage battery works, the candidate was still lost. Wien saw no reason to pass the young man, no matter how brilliant he was in other fields." (Cassidy, Uncertainty)The result was that Heisenberg received the lowest of three passing grades in physics and the same overall grade (cum laude) for his doctorate, both of which were an average between Sommerfeld's highest grade and Wien's lowest grade.There is an interesting epilogue to the story. When Heisenberg derived the uncertainty relations several years later, he used the resolving power of the microscope to derive the uncertainty relations - and he still had difficulty with it. When Bohr pointed out the error, it led to emotional difficulties for Heisenberg. Likewise, this time a positive result came of the affair: Heisenberg's reaction induced Bohr to formulate his own views on the subject, which ultimately led to the so-called Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mecha. Seller Inventory # 53190
Quantity Available: 1
From: Jeremy Norman's historyofscience (Novato, CA, U.S.A.)
About this Item: 1930. Heisenberg, Werner (1901-76) and Wolfgang Pauli (1900-1958). (1) Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder. Offprint from Zeitschrift für Physik 56 (1929). 61pp. 231 x 160 mm. Original printed wrappers, spine repaired. (2) Zur Quantentheorie der Wellenfelder. II. Offprint from Zeitschrift für Physik 59 (1930). 168-190pp. 231 x 160 mm. Original printed wrappers, spine repaired with clear tape. Together 2 items. Small mark from paper clip on wrappers of no. (1), small tear in front wrapper of no. (2), but very good. First Editions, Offprint Issues. Heisenberg and Pauli's two-part paper contains the first full-fledged relativistic quantum field theory, representing the "formal invention of quantum electrodynamics" (Miller, Early Quantum Electrodynamics: A Source Book, p. xiii). "This extremely technical and mathematical branch of quantum physics, the foundations of which were laid by Heisenberg, Dirac, Pauli, Jordan, and their colleagues during the late 1920s and early 1930s, continues to this day with much the same program and approach . . . [Heisenberg was] a leading member of the small band of abstract theorists who established the program and laid the foundations of relativistic quantum field theory as it has been pursued ever since" (Cassidy, Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg, p. 276). In this paper-the only one that Heisenberg and Pauli co-authored-the two physicists attempted to establish "a consistent extension of the quantum formalism that would yield a satisfactory unification of quantum mechanics and relativity theory . . . In 1929, drawing upon the work of Dirac, Jordan, Oskar Klein, and others, Heisenberg and Pauli succeeded in formulating a general gauge-invariant relativistic quantum field theory by treating particles and fields as separate entities interacting through the intermediaries of field quanta. The formalism led to the creation of a relativistic quantum electrodynamics, equivalent to that developed by Dirac, which, despite its puzzling negative energy states, seemed satisfactory at low energies and small orders of interaction. But at high energies, where particles approach closer than their radii, the interaction energy diverges to infinity. Even at rest, a lone electron interacting with its own field seemed to possess an infinite self-energy . . . Attention was directed to the resolution of such difficulties for more than two decades" (Dictionary of Scientific Biography). Mehra & Rechenberg, The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, 6, pp. 312-26. Seller Inventory # 43254
Published by Julius Springer, Berlin (1925)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Manhattan Rare Book Company, ABAA, ILAB (New York, NY, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Julius Springer, Berlin, 1925. Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. 1st Edition. FIRST EDITIONS of three papers that defined a discipline: THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATION FOR QUANTUM MECHANICS. "In May 1925, Heisenberg deliberately abandoned the classical picture of particles and orbits, and took a long, hard look at the mathematics that describes the associations between pairs of quantum states, without asking himself how the quantum entity gets from state A to state B. In the summer of 1925, working with Pasqual Jordan, Born translated Heisenberg's mathematical insight into the formal language of matrices, and Born, Heisenberg and Jordan together published a full account of the work, in what became known as the 'three-man paper'. The equations of Newtonian (classical) mechanics were replaced by similar equations involving matrices, and many of the fundamental concepts of classical mechanics- such as the conservation of energy- emerged naturally from the new equations. Matrix mechanics seemed to contain Newtonian Mechanics within itself, in much the same way that the equations of the general theory of relativity include the Newtonian description of gravity as a special case" (Gribben, Q is for Quantum). Heisenberg, Werner. Uber quantentheorestische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen. Particle Physics: One Hundred Years of Discoveries: "Foundation of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg approach. Nobel Prize to W. Heisenberg awarded in 1932 'for the creation of quantum mechanics'". Heisenberg; Born, Max and Jordan, Pasqual. Zur Quantenmechanik.Particle Physics: One Hundred Years of Discoveries: "Invention of matrix formalism for the Heisenberg quantum mechanics. Systems with one degree of freedom." Heisenberg, Born, Jordan. Zur Quantenmechanik II. Particle Physics: One Hundred Years of Discoveries: "Development of matrix formalism for the Heisenberg quantum mechanics. Systems with arbitrary many degrees of freedom." IN: Zeitschrift fur Physik, Vols. 33 (pp. 879-893), 34 (858-888), 35 (557-615). Berlin: Julius Springer, 1925-1926. Octavo, volume 33 with half black cloth over marbled boards; volume 34 and 35 in half red cloth over red boards. Volume 33 is taller (wider margins) than the other two volumes. A few institutional stamps to preliminaries. All three volumes with stamps from the prestigious Gmelin Institute (after 1996, part of the Max Planck Institute). Overall, very good condition. Seller Inventory # 465
Quantity Available: 1
From: Lynge & Søn ILAB-LILA (Copenhagen, Denmark)
About this Item: Berlin, Julius Springer, 1925-26. Bound in 4 nearly uniform contemp. hcloth. Edges a little rubbed. Stamp on title-pages. In "Zeitschrift für Physik. Hrsg. von Karl Scheel", Vols 33,34,35 and 36. VII,950;VII,953;VIII,954;VII,951 pp. The offered papers: pp. 879-893 (vol.33), pp. 858-888 (vol.34), pp.557-615 (vol.35) and pp.336-363 (vol. 36). Internally fine and clean. First printings of these four absolutely fundamental papers, which together MARK THE TURNING POINT IN THE FABRICATION OF A NEW PHYSICS, Quantum Mechanics, also called "Matrix Mechanics"."In May 1925, Heisenberg took on a new and difficult problem, the calculation of the line intensities of the hydrogen spectrum. Just as he had done with Kramers and Bohr, Heisenberg began with a Fourier analysis of the electron orbits. When the hydrogen orbit proved too difficult, he turned to the anharmonic oscillator. With a new multiplication rule relating the amplitudes and frequencies of the Fourier components to observed quantities, Heisenberg succeeded in quantizing the equations of motion for this system in close analogy with the classical equations of motion.in June Heisenberg returned to Göttingen, where he drafted his fundamental paper [the first paper offered], which he completed in July. In this paper Heisenberg proclaimed that the quantum mechanics of atoms should contain only relations between experimentally observable quantities. The resulting formalism served as the starting point for the new quantum mechanics, based, as Heisenberg's multiplication rule implied, on the manipulation of ordered sets of data forming a mathematical matrix.Born and his assistant, Pascual Jordan, quickly developed the mathematical content of Heisenberg's work into a consistent theory with the help of abstract matrix algebra [the second paper offered].Their work, in collaboration with Heisenberg, culminated in their "three-man paper" ["Dreimännerarbeit" - the third paper offered] that served as the foundation of matrix mechanics. Confident of the correctness of the new theory, Heisenberg, Pauli, Born, Dirac, and others began applying the difficult mathematical formalism to the solution of lingering problems." (DSB).In the last paper offered, the Pauli-paper, he shows that the hydrogen spectrum can be derived from the new theory. His starting-point constitutes, due to Lez, a method for integrating the classical equations of motion of a particle in a Coulomb field. Pauli's paper was received on January 17, 1926, but the main result must have been obtained before November 3, 1925, for on that date, Heisenberg writes Pauli: ".Ich brauche Ihnen wohl nicht zu schreiben, wie sehr ich mich über die neue Theorie des Wasserstoffs freue." Pauli's paper convinced most physicists that Quantum Mechanics is correct. (Van der Waerden). Seller Inventory # 39170
Quantity Available: 1
From: Lynge & Søn ILAB-LILA (Copenhagen, Denmark)
About this Item: Berlin, Julius Springer, 1927. 8vo. Contemporary full cloth with gilt lettering to spine. A small paper-label pasted to lower part of spine. Very light edgewear. Corners a bit bumped. In: 'Zeitschrift für Physik', Volume 43, p.172-198. The entire volume offered, VII,936 pp. First appearance of the first announcement of Heisenberg's famous "Uncertainty Principle", stating that it is impossible to determine accurately and both members of specific pairs of atomic variables simultaneously, and that the minimum product of the two variables are proportional to Planck's constant 'h' - one of the most important and celebrated findings in modern physics."Heisenberg's paper 'On the physical content of the quantum theoretical kinematics and mechanics' was received by the publishers on 23 March, after Bohr had returned - and had correctly criticized some substantial points in the manuscript. All the same Heisenberg's work is on a par with his discovery paper of quantum mechanics and represents a most solid contribution to its interpretation. It is THE FIRST PAPER IN WHICH THE QUESTION OF WHAT IS OBSERVABLE AND WHAT IS NOT IS QUANTITATIVELY DISCUSSED IN THE CONTEXT OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. His work marks the beginning of a subject on which volumes have since been written: the measurement problem in quantum physics." (Pais in "Niels Bohr's Times", p. 304). Seller Inventory # 43294
Published by Berlin : J. Springer (1925)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Sequitur Books (Boonsboro, MD, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Berlin : J. Springer, 1925. Hardcover. Condition: Used: Very Good. 2 Volumes. Band 34 and 37. Bound in modern 3/4 crushed red Moroccan leather. Red cloth boards. TEG. Gilt spine. 5 raised bands. Fine binding and cover. Clean, unmarked pages. Ships daily. Band 34 contains "Uber die physikalischen Konsequenzen der relativistischen Axiomatik" p. 32-48 by Hans Reichenbach and "Zur Quantenmechanik" p. 858-888 by Max Born and Pasqual Jordan. Band 37 contains the first Russian paper on matrix mechanics, "Zur Quantenmechanik des rotators", 685-688 by Igor Tamm, Anwendung der Quantenmechanik auf das Problem der anomalen Zeemaneffekte by Pasqual Jordan; Werner Heisenberg, 263-277 and Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgange by Max Born, 863-867. Max Born's paper would he first to clearly enunciate the probabilistic interpretation of the quantum wavefunction, which had been introduced by Erwin Schrodinger. It would be criticize by Schrodinger but lead to Einstein's quote in a letter "He [God] does not play dice". Seller Inventory # 1507150012
Published by Julius Springer, Berlin (1926)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Manhattan Rare Book Company, ABAA, ILAB (New York, NY, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Julius Springer, Berlin, 1926. Soft cover. Condition: Very Good. 1st Edition. FIRST EDITION IN ORIGINAL WRAPPERS of the famous "three-man paper," the first, complete, self-consistent description of quantum mechanics. "In 1925, after an extended visit to Bohr's Institute of Theoretical Physics at the University of Copenhagen, Heisenberg tackled the problem of spectrum intensities of the electron taken as an anharmonic oscillator (a one-dimensional vibrating system). His position that the theory should be based only on observable quantities was central to his paper of July 1925, "Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen" ("Quantum-Theoretical Reinterpretation of Kinematic and Mechanical Relations"). Heisenberg's formalism rested upon noncommutative multiplication; Born, together with his new assistant Pascual Jordan, realized that this could be expressed using matrix algebra, which they used in a paper submitted for publication in September as "Zur Quantenmechanik" ("On Quantum Mechanics"). By November, Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan had completed "Zur Quantenmechanik II" ("On Quantum Mechanics II"), colloquially known as the "three-man paper," which is regarded as the foundational document of a new quantum mechanics" (Britannica's Guide to the Nobel Prizes). Particle Physics: One Hundred Years of Discoveries: "Development of matrix formalism for the Heisenberg quantum mechanics. Systems with arbitrary many degrees of freedom." Provenance: With ownership signature on front wrapper of E.F. Barker, noted American physicist who worked primarily at the University of Michigan. IN: Zeitschrift für Physik, Band 35, February 1926, pp. 557-615. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1926. Octavo, original wrappers; custom box. A few creases to wrappers, chips to spine. RARE in original wrappers. Seller Inventory # 1276
Published by Belser Presse,Stuttgart (1971)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Antiquariat Stammerjohann (Hamburg, HAM, Germany)
About this Item: Belser Presse,Stuttgart, 1971. The meaning of beauty in exact natural science. Vortrag vor der Bayerischen Akademie der Schönen Künste. Übetragung ins Englische von Enrico Cantore, New York. Mit drei signierten ganzseitigen Original-Farblithographien von Max Ernst. Stuttgart, Belser-Presse (= 7. Druck der Belser-Presse) 1971. Folio. 79(5) S. , 3 Tafeln. Handgebundener Orig.-Leinenbd. mit Cellophan-Umschlag. In handgefertigem Orig.-Schuber.-Erste Buchausgabe. - Spies-Leppin 198 D. - Eins von 185 num. Exemplaren. - Getrüffeltes Exemplar, bei dem neben dem Druckvermerk alle Lithographien von Max Ernst signiert wurden. - Druck der Lithographien auf Bütten durch Pierre Chave, in Vence. - Erste Ausgabe-Sehr schönes Exemplar. Seller Inventory # 216115
Published by Julius Springer, Berlin
Quantity Available: 1
From: Atticus Rare Books (West Branch, IA, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Julius Springer, Berlin. 1st Edition. FIRST EDITIONS OF THREE LANDMARK PAPERS THAT TOGETHER FORMED THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. "In spite of its high-sounding name and its successful solutions of numerous problems in atomic physics, quantum theory, and especially the quantum theory of polyelectronic systems, prior to 1925, was, from the methodological point of view, a lamentable hodgepodge of hypotheses, principles, theorems, and computational recipes rather than a logical consistent theory. Every single quantum-theoretic problem had to be solved first in terms of classical physics; its classical solution had then to pass through the mysterious sieve of the quantum conditions or, as it happened in the majority of cases, the classical solution had to be translated into the language of quanta in conformance with the correspondence principle? In short, quantum theory still lacked two essential characteristics of a full-fledged scientific theory, conceptual autonomy and logical consistency" (Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, 196). The work of Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan in these papers began to rectify these issues and together marked the "starting point for the new quantum mechanics," also called matrix mechanics (DSB). "In May 1925, Heisenberg took on a new and difficult problem, the calculation of the line intensities of the hydrogen spectrum. Just as he had done with Kramers and Bohr, Heisenberg began with a Fourier analysis of the electron orbits. When the hydrogen orbit proved too difficult, he turned to the an harmonic oscillator. With a new multiplication rule relating the amplitudes and frequencies of the Fourier components to observed quantities, Heisenberg succeeded in quantizing the equations of motion for this system in close analogy with the classical equations of motion. In June Heisenberg returned to Göttingen, where he drafted his fundamental paper [the first paper offered], which he completed in July. In this paper Heisenberg proclaimed that the quantum mechanics of atoms should contain only relations between experimentally observable quantities. The resulting formalism served as the starting point for the new quantum mechanics, based, as Heisenberg's multiplication rule implied, on the manipulation of ordered sets of data forming a mathematical matrix. Born and his assistant, Pascual Jordan, quickly developed the mathematical content of Heisenberg's work into a consistent theory with the help of abstract matrix algebra [the second paper offered].Their work, in collaboration with Heisenberg, culminated in their "three-man paper" ["Dreimännerarbeit" - the third paper offered] that served as the foundation of matrix mechanics. Confident of the correctness of the new theory, Heisenberg, Pauli, Born, Dirac, and others began applying the difficult mathematical formalism to the solution of lingering problems" (DSB). ALSO INCLUDED in ZfP Volume 33 is a major milestone in gravitational wave theory: the Czech physicist Guido Beck's discovery of a family of exact solutions to the equations of general relativity representing gravitational waves with cylindrical symmetry (called 'Beck vacua' or 'cylindrical gravitational waves'). His paper, "Zur Theorie Binärer Gravitationsfelder" appears on pp. 713-738. NOTE: We also offer the Heisenberg paper (Volume 33) as a lone offering. Heisenberg, Werner "Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen" in Zeitschrift für Physik, 33, 1925, pp. 879-893. CONDITION & DETAILS: In: Zeitschrift für Physik 33 (1925), 34 (1925), 35 (1926). 8vo. (9 x 6.25 inches; 225 x 156mm). Three full volumes. All but invisible ex-libris stamp on title pages; no other library markings whatsoever. Handsomely rebound in grey linen, gilt-tooled and lettered at the spine. Tightly and solidly bound. Very clean inside and out. Near fine condition. Seller Inventory # 9
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 10.
Published by Julius Springer, Berlin, 1929-1930
Quantity Available: 1
From: Charles Parkhurst Rare Books, Inc. ABAA (Sun City West, AZ, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Julius Springer, Berlin, 1929-1930. Hard Cover. First Edition. In "Zeitschrift fur Physik" Vol. 56, 1-61pp. and Vol. 59, 168-190pp; bound in blue cloth, spine lettering and call letters gilt; stamp of the Mount Wilson Observatory on front free endpaper, no other library markings. Both volumes are fine and housed in a custom clamshell. These are the only papers on which Heisenberg and Pauli, both Nobel Laureates in Physics (1932 and 1945) collaborated. These are unquestionably important early works in the development of relativistic quantum electrodynamic theory. Seller Inventory # 0775
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 11.
Published by Gauithier-Villars et Cie., Paris (1928)
Quantity Available: 1
From: The Book Gallery (Jerusalem, Israel)
About this Item: Gauithier-Villars et Cie., Paris, 1928. RARE publication of papers and discussions that took place at the Fifth Solvay International Conference on Electrons and Photon in October 1927, where the world's most notable physicists met to discuss the newly formulated quantum theory. The leading figures were Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. Seventeen of the twenty-nine attendees were or became Nobel Prize winners, including Marie Curie, who alone among them, had won Nobel Prizes in two separate scientific disciplines. This conference was also the culmination of the struggle between Einstein and the scientific realists, who wanted strict rules of scientific method as laid out by Charles Peirce and Karl Popper, versus Bohr and the instrumentalists, who wanted looser rules based on outcomes; the instrumentalists won, instrumentalism having been seen as the norm ever since. Contains H.A.Lorentz's portrait as frontispiece. [CONTENTS]: H.-A.Lorentz - Notice nécrologique; Cinquieme Conseil de Physique / W.-L.Bragg - L'intensit de reflexion des rayons X / Arthur H.Compton - Discordances entre l'experience et la theorie electro-magnetique du rayonnement / de Broglie - La nouvelle dynamique des quanta / Max Born et Werner Heisenberg - La mecanique des quanta / Erwin Schrödinger - La mecanique des ondes / Niels Bohr - Le postulat des quanta et le nouveau development de l'automatisme. 255x165mm. VIII+289 pages [+7]. Softcover. Cover detached, yellowing, wrinkled and tattered. Front cover right bottom and left upper corners, rear cover bottom edges and right upper corner, and spine partly missing. Small sticker on rear cover left bottom corner. Spine worn and stained. Binding slightly loose. Several last pages coming loose from binding. Pages upper corner wrinkled. Pages yellowing. [SUMMARY]: This rare book, one of the most significant historical documents of modern science, is otherwise in good condition. PLEASE NOTE: This book's cover is very worn, loose or missing. If you'd like, we can send this book to be rebound for an extra charge. The book is in : French. Seller Inventory # MA 16 21
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 12.
Published by Julius Springer, Berlin (1925)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Atticus Rare Books (West Branch, IA, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Julius Springer, Berlin, 1925. 1st Edition. FULL VOLUME 1st EDITION OF HEISENBERG'S SEMINAL 1925 PAPER LAYING THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. Written when he was 23, Heisenberg's new theory - "the starting point for quantum mechanics" -- "was based only on what can be observed, that is to say, on the radiation emitted by the atom. We cannot, he said, always assign to an electron a position in space at a given time, nor follow it in its orbit, so that we cannot assume that the planetary orbits postulated by Niels Bohr actually exist. Mechanical quantities, such as position, velocity, etc. should be represented, not by ordinary numbers, but by abstract mathematical structures called "matrices" and he formulated his new theory in terms of matrix equations" (DSB; Nobel Prize Committee). "In spite of its high-sounding name and its successful solutions of numerous problems in atomic physics, quantum theory, and especially the quantum theory of polyelectronic systems, prior to 1925, was, from the methodological point of view, a lamentable hodgepodge of hypotheses, principles, theorems, and computational recipes rather than a logical consistent theory. Every single quantum-theoretic problem had to be solved first in terms of classical physics; its classical solution had then to pass through the mysterious sieve of the quantum conditions or, as it happened in the majority of cases, the classical solution had to be translated into the language of quanta in conformance with the correspondence principle? In short, quantum theory still lacked two essential characteristics of a full-fledged scientific theory, conceptual autonomy and logical consistency" (Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, 196). "In May 1925, Heisenberg took on a new and difficult problem, the calculation of the line intensities of the hydrogen spectrum. Just as he had done with Kramers and Bohr, Heisenberg began with a Fourier analysis of the electron orbits. When the hydrogen orbit proved too difficult, he turned to the anharmonic oscillator. With a new multiplication rule relating the amplitudes and frequencies of the Fourier components to observed quantities, Heisenberg succeeded in quantizing the equations of motion for this system in close analogy with the classical equations of motion. In June Heisenberg returned to Göttingen, where he drafted his fundamental paper [the paper offered], which he completed in July. In it, Heisenberg proclaimed that the quantum mechanics of atoms should contain only relations between experimentally observable quantities. The resulting formalism served as the starting point for the new quantum mechanics, based, as Heisenberg's multiplication rule implied, on the manipulation of ordered sets of data forming a mathematical matrix. "Max Born and his assistant, Pascual Jordan, quickly developed the mathematical content of Heisenberg's work into a consistent theory with the help of abstract matrix algebra. Confident of the correctness of the new theory, Heisenberg, Pauli, Born, Dirac, and others began applying the difficult mathematical formalism to the solution of lingering problems" (DSB). In 1932 he was awarded the Nobel Prize "for the creation of quantum mechanics". NOTE: We offer separately a three-volume set of Heisenberg, Born's and Jordan's papers, Volumes 33, 34, 35. ALSO INCLUDED: A major milestone in gravitational wave theory: the Czech physicist Guido Beck's discovery of a family of exact solutions to the equations of general relativity representing gravitational waves with cylindrical symmetry (called 'Beck vacua' or 'cylindrical gravitational waves'). "Zur Theorie Binärer Gravitationsfelder", pp. 713-738. ALSO INCLUDED: Born's "Zur Quantentheorie aperiodischer Vorgänge", pp. 479-508 and Jordan's "Bemerkungen zur Theorie der Atomstruktur", pp. 563-571. CONDITION & DETAILS: 8vo. Tightly bound in black cloth with some rubbing and scuffing of the boards; gilt-lettered at the spine. No library markings whatsoever. Internally fine with no m. Seller Inventory # 991
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 13.
Quantity Available: 1
From: Lynge & Søn ILAB-LILA (Copenhagen, Denmark)
About this Item: Berlin, Julius Springer, 1925. 8vo. Bound in full cloth with library label to lower part of spine and library stamps to front free end paper. In "Zeitschrift für Physik, 33. Band, 1925". Front boards very loose and spine almost detached. Internally fine and clean. [Heisenberg) Pp. 879-893. [Entire issue: VII, (1), 950 pp.]. First printing of Heiseberg's seminal and groundbreaking paper which laid the foundation for matrix mechanics and thereby giving birth to modern quantum mechanics; a theory that states quantum mechanics should be based "exclusively on relationship between quantities which in principle are observable" (From the abstract). "The alternative, which he [Heisenberg] chose in his historic paper [the present] and which led to the development of matrix machanics, the earliest formulation of modern quantum mechanics, abandoned Bohr's description of motion in terms of classical physics altogether and replaced it by a description in terms of what Heisenberg regarded as observable magnitudes" (Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, P. 197)."After nearly two weeks on Helgoland, Heisenberg returned to Göttingen, where he drafted his fundamental paper "Über die quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen," which he completed in July. In this paper Heisenberg proclaimed that the quantum mechanics of atoms should contain only relations between experimentally observable quantities. Theresulting formalism served as the starting point for the new quantum mechanics, based, as Heisenberg's multiplication rule implied, on the manipulation of ordered sets of data forming a mathematical matrix." (DSB)Before Heisenberg's discovery the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantum theory was the leading theory. By the early 1920's most physicists agreed that the Bohr-Sommerfeld theory had problems and that there was a need to replace it with a new quantum theory. Heisenberg's main achievement was to replace the idea of orbital path with what could be observed, namely the light emitted and absorbed by the atoms. Because of the unfamiliar mathematics which Heisenberg's new theory used, several physicists had doubts about its consistency. But Max Born soon realized that the laws, which the theory relied on, were the same as the laws, which apply to matrix algebra. In 1925 Born and his student Pascual Jordan published "Zur Quantenmechanik" which reformulated Heisenbergs theory in terms of matrices, in the special case of one degree of freedom. With "Zur Quantenmechanik II" (or the "Three Man Paper") published 1926, Heisenberg, Born and Jordan described the new theory in the general case of arbitrarely many freedom degrees. Seller Inventory # 45483
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 14.
Published by Vieweg und Springer, Berlin (1926)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Atticus Rare Books (West Branch, IA, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Vieweg und Springer, Berlin, 1926. 1st Edition. FIRST EDITION IN ORIGINAL WRAPS OF BORN, HEISENBERG, & JORDAN'S "MONUMENTAL" THREE-MAN PAPER, 'ON QUANTUM MECHANICS II', THE FIRST COMPLETE STATEMENT OF MATRIX MECHANICS (Peacock, Quantum Revolution, 52). In this work, Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan extend the methods Heisenberg presented in his initial 1925 paper and apply them to a number of important problems. "This paper definitively set forth [and first named] matrix mechanics - the version of quantum mechanics based on the algebraic manipulation of matrices that represent observable quantities such as position, momentum, and energy. Detailed calculations showed that the new matrix mechanics was very successful in predicting the anomalous Zeeman Effect, other forms of line splitting, and line intensities. The three authors even produced a new derivation of Planck's Law" (ibid). In the early 1920s there were fundamental difficulties in atomic physics. The quantum theory of atomic structure, founded by Bohr and largely developed by Bohr and Sommerfeld, did not describe the properties of complicated atoms and molecules. "In spite of its high-sounding name and its successful solutions of numerous problems in atomic physics, 'quantum theory', and especially the 'quantum theory' of polyelectronic systems, prior to 1925, was, from the methodological point of view, a lamentable hodgepodge of hypotheses, principles, theorems, and computational recipes rather than a logical consistent theory. Every single quantum-theoretic problem had to be solved first in terms of classical physics; its classical solution had then to pass through the mysterious sieve of the quantum conditions or, as it happened in the majority of cases, the classical solution had to be translated into the language of quanta in conformance with the correspondence principle? In short, quantum theory still lacked two essential characteristics of a full-fledged scientific theory, conceptual autonomy and logical consistency" (Jammer, The Conceptual Development, 196). The work of Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan rectified these issues and marked the "starting point for the new quantum mechanics," also called matrix mechanics (DSB). Heisenberg published his initial paper formulating his new quantum theory in 1925, but without reference to matrices. "Later the same year, Max Born and Pascual Jordan published a second paper that introduced the matrix formulation for the special case of one degree of freedom" (History of Physics: The Wenner Collection). Finally, in early 1926, all three scientists collaborated on a third paper, this 'three-man paper', and extended the theory to an arbitrary number of degrees of freedom. In its final form, they argued, Heisenberg's formulation of the new quantum theory is a matrix algebra of quantum operators that "predicts the radiation resulting from electron state transitions between energy shells in the atom without reference to how the transitions occur" (ibid). CONDITION & DETAILS: Berlin: Vieweg und Springer. Large 8vo. (9 x 6 inches; 225 x 150mm). pp. 557-722. Complete issue, rebacked at the spine and housed in a handsome leather clamshell case gilt-lettered at the spine and on the front board. The front wrap has a red stamp and some minor soiling (see scans). The interior is bright and clean throughout. Very good condition. Seller Inventory # 848
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 15.
Published by Stuttgart Belser-Presse 1971 (1971)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Antiquariat Dieter Eckert (Bremen, Germany)
About this Item: Stuttgart Belser-Presse 1971, 1971. Folio, 79 (3) S., 1 Bl. mit drei Lithographien, Orig.-Leinen m. Orig.-Leinenschuber. Eines von 185 (gesamt 205) nummerierten und vom Künstler im Impressum signierten Exemplaren.- Spies-Leppin 198 D I-II; Spindler, Typen 64.7.- (= Siebenter Druck der Belser-Presse).- Tadelloses Exemplar. Seller Inventory # 45711
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 16.
Published by Julius Springer 1929-30, Berlin (1929)
Quantity Available: 1
From: SOPHIA RARE BOOKS (Koebenhavn V, Denmark)
About this Item: Julius Springer 1929-30, Berlin, 1929. First editions, first printings. A fine set, in the original wrappers, of the two papers in which Heisenberg and Pauli gave "for the first time the foundations for quantum electrodynamics in the way we know it today." (Abraham Pais). "Three years before the discovery of the positron Heisenberg and Pauli – in two papers ‘Zur Quantenmechanik der Wellenfelder’ and ‘Zur Quantenmechanik der Wellenfelder II’ of 29 March and 7 September 1929, respectively – took a decisive step forward to develop a consistent theory of quantum electrodynamics." (Mehra & Milton). "Heisenberg’s foremost scientific concern after 1927 involved the search for a consistent extension of the quantum formalism that would yield a satisfactory unification of quantum mechanics and relativity theory. This required the formulation of a covariant theory of interacting particles and fields that accounted for elementary processes at high energies and small distances. In 1929, drawing upon the work of Dirac, Jordan, Oskar Klein, and others, Heisenberg and Pauli succeeded in formulating a general gauge-invariant relativistic quantum field theory by treating particles and fields as separate entities interacting through the intermediaries of field quanta. "The formalism led to the creation of a relativistic quantum electrodynamics, equivalent to that developed by Dirac, which, despite its puzzling negative energy states, seemed satisfactory at low energies and small orders of interaction. But at high energies, where particles approach closer than their radii, the interaction energy diverged to infinity. Even at rest, a lone electron interacting with its own field seemed to possess an infinite self-energy, much as it did in classical electrodynamics. Attention was directed to the resolution of such difficulties for more than two decades." (DSB under Heisenberg). "Heisenberg and Pauli were well aware of the shortcomings of their theory: the divergence difficulties and the problem of negative energies for the electron. However, the importance of the Heisenberg-Pauli theory cannot be exaggerated; it opened the road to a general theory of quantized fields and thereby prepared the tools, albeit not perfect ones, for the Pauli-Fermi theory of beta-decay and for the meson theories." (Mehra & Milton). Mehra & Milton, Climbing the Mountain: The Scientific Biography of Julian Schwinger, pp. 186-87; Pais, On the Dirac theory of the electron. An annotation, in Werner Heienberg: Collected Works, Vol. AII, pp.95-105. 8vo: 229 x 156 mm. In: Zeitschift für Physik, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 1-61; vol. 59, no. 3-4, pp. 168-90. The two complete issues offered here in the original printed wrappers, some light wear to the spine strip of the first issue and two small pieces missing from the lower left corner (front and rear), otherwise very fine with no stamps or other markings. Rare in such fine condition. A fine set, in the original wrappers, of the two papers in which Heisenberg and Pauli gave "for the first time the foundations for quantum electrodynamics in the way we know it today." (Abraham Pais). "Three years before the discovery of the positron Heisenberg and Pauli – in two papers ‘Zur Quantenmechanik der Wellenfelder’ and ‘Zur Quantenmechanik der Wellenfelder II’ of 29 March and 7 September 1929, respectively – took a decisive step forward to develop a consistent theory of quantum electrodynamics." (Mehra & Milton). "Heisenberg’s foremost scientific concern after 1927 involved the search for a consistent extension of the quantum formalism that would yield a satisfactory unification of quantum mechanics and relativity theory. This required the formulation of a covariant theory of interacting particles and fields that accounted for elementary processes at high energies and small distances. In 1929, drawing upon the work of Dirac, Jordan, Oskar Klein, and others, Heisenberg and Pauli succeeded in formulating a general gauge-invariant relativistic quantum field theory by treating particles and fields as separate entities in. Seller Inventory # 2627
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 17.
Quantity Available: 1
From: Jeremy Norman's historyofscience (Novato, CA, U.S.A.)
About this Item: 1947. Heisenberg, Werner (1901-76). Research in Germany on the technical application of atomic energy. Offprint from Nature 160 (1947). 10, [1]pp. 212 x 145 mm. Without wrappers as issued. Fine copy. First Edition in English, Offprint Issue. During World War II Heisenberg was one of the principal scientists leading research and development in Germany's nuclear energy program. At that time the Allies had no idea of how far Germany had progressed in the quest to build a nuclear reactor, but given Germany's leading role in the advancement of nuclear physics they had every reason to believe that the Nazis were ahead of the game-in fact, the fear of a German "atom bomb" was one of the main reasons behind the establishment of the Manhattan Project. This fear turned out to be groundless: Due to a combination of factors, including Hitler's dislike of "Jewish science" and the "White Jew" Heisenberg, Germany had fallen far behind the United States in the development of nuclear energy. fter the bombing of Hiroshima Heisenberg became one of the primary crafters of Germany's official account of its wartime nuclear energy program. In December 1946 he published his first postwar summary of the program in the journal Naturwissenschaften; the present English translation, slightly abridged from the German, appeared in Nature the following August. In the summary Heisenberg argued that Germany's failure to advance its nuclear program was due both to enormous technical difficulties and to the lack of political and financial support; he also played up his own role in slowing down the project by quashing Nazi officials' hopes for the imminent development of atomic weapons. "Heisenberg's self-serving account parallels but overinterprets actual events. He especially did try to maintain scientific control over the [nuclear energy] project. He was also aware of the theoretical possibility of a nuclear explosive by late 1941, he did not demand a crash research and development to build one, and he did seem content to work for the rest of the war on the more modest program of building a reactor. It is difficult to assess his intentions and motives beyond that. But from what we know of his activities and research, there is nothing to support the notion that Heisenberg actually hindered the project in any way to keep an explosive out of Hitler's hands or even that he himself had that much control of the situation" (Cassidy, Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg, p. 510). Seller Inventory # 43266
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 18.
Quantity Available: 1
From: Jeremy Norman's historyofscience (Novato, CA, U.S.A.)
About this Item: 1925. Kramers-Heisenberg Formula-Stepping Stone to the New Quantum Mechanics Kramers, Hendrik Anthony (1894-1952) and Werner Heisenberg (1901-76). Über die Streuung von Strahlung durch Atome. Offprint from Zeitschrift für Physik 31 (1925). 681-708pp. Original printed wrappers. Light toning, but fine. First Edition, Offprint Issue. During his 1924 visit to Bohr's Institute for Theoretical Physics in Copenhagen, Heisenberg and Bohr's assistant H. A. Kramers worked together on the problem of atomic structure from the point of view of dispersion theory. "At first, this interest might appear strange because the problems of atomic structure, say, e.g., the calculation of the energy states of helium, would not seem to have any connection with the scattering of light by atoms, which was the principal concern of dispersion theory. However, Bohr and his collaborators had concluded that the problem of atomic structure could not be separated from the problem of the emission and absorption of radiation-and this could be considered as a problem of the dispersion of radiation" (Mehra & Rechenberg, Historical Development of Quantum Theory, 2, p. 170). Kramers and Heisenberg's joint paper on the dispersion of light by atoms contained the important Kramers-Heisenberg dispersion formula, an expression of the cross section for scattering of a photon by an atomic electron; among other things, the formula explained the phenomenon of inelastic scattering, anticipating the Raman effect. Heisenberg's work on this paper "was the final touch needed for [him] to fabricate quantum mechanics six months later" (Cassidy, Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg, p. 188). Seller Inventory # 43379
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 19.
Published by Greenwood Press,London (1969)
ISBN 10: 0837120896 ISBN 13: 9780837120898
Quantity Available: 1
From: Better World Books (Mishawaka, IN, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Greenwood Press,London, 1969. Condition: Good. New ed of 1953 ed. Shows some signs of wear, and may have some markings on the inside. Seller Inventory # GRP91910549
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 20.
Published by Springer 1943; 1943; 1944, Berlin (1943)
Quantity Available: 1
From: SOPHIA RARE BOOKS (Koebenhavn V, Denmark)
About this Item: Springer 1943; 1943; 1944, Berlin, 1943. First edition of Heisenberg’s S-matrix approach to the study of elementary particles, complete in three parts (a fourth part was written but not published). Although S-matrix theory was abandoned after the War due to the success of quantum electrodynamics and quantum chromodynamics, it again became very influential in the 1960s when it led to the development of string theory, which is the best-accepted approach to quantum gravity."Heisenberg’s prewar researches in quantum field theory, undertaken in part with Pauli, had led him to the study of cosmic rays, the highest energy particles then available for research. When an extremely high-energy cosmic ray strikes the earth’s atmosphere, it induces a shower of newly created particles and photons. This effect was to be explained on the basis of quantum field theory. Heisenberg’s researches had previously convinced him and others of the inadequacy of field theories for this task. Infinities and divergences plagued all three of the available theories - quantum electrodynamics, Fermi’s theory of beta decay (relating to what is now the weak force), and Yukawa’s meson theory (relating to what is now the strong, or nuclear, force). "The small size of elementary particles and the close approach of the particles to each other in a cosmic ray collision – which triggered the particle shower – indicated to Heisenberg during the 1930s that the difficulties in quantum field theory could be resolved only if a universal minimum length, a new fundamental constant, were introduced into the theory according to Heisenberg, quantum mechanics itself broke down when applied to events occurring within regions smaller than the size of an elementary particle "Pauli had already suggested that Heisenberg, as he did when formulating the 1925 breakthrough in quantum mechanics, should focus only on observable quantities and attempt to exclude all unobservable variables from the theory. Heisenberg now attempted to do so, at the height of the World War. His effort led to what became after the war his widely studied new theory of elementary particles, the so-called S-matrix theory. "In his new approach, Heisenberg used this hypothetical fundamental length to define the allowed changes in the momentum and energy of two colliding high-speed elementary particles. This limitation would help identify the properties of the collision that were observable in present theories. Those at smaller distances were unobservable. For two colliding particles, this yielded four sets of observable quantities with which to work: two of these were the properties of the two particles as seen in the laboratory long before they collide with each other; and two were their properties long after the collision. During the collision they approach within a distance of less than the fundamental length and are thus unobservable. These four sets of observable properties could be arranged in a table, or in this type of work, a matrix, which Heisenberg called the scattering or S-matrix. "Although Heisenberg could not actually specify the four elements of the S-matrix, he demonstrated that it must contain in principle all of the information about the collision. In his second paper, completed in October 1942, Heisenberg further showed that the S-matrix for several simple examples of scattering of particles yielded the observed probabilities for scattering. It also gave the possibility for his favorite phenomenon – the appearance of cosmic-ray explosion showers " one evening in October 1943 Heisenberg presented his new theory to an informal colloquium in Kramers’s home near Leiden in the German-occupied Netherlands During the discussion of Heisenberg’s talk, Kramers made the insightful observation that if the actual elements of the matrix could ever be determined without a complete theory, they would yield a so-called "analytic function" – that is, a function containing real and imaginary parts Back in Berlin, Heisenberg wrote immediately that he. Seller Inventory # 3530
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 21.
Quantity Available: 1
From: Lynge & Søn ILAB-LILA (Copenhagen, Denmark)
About this Item: Berlin, J. Springer, 1932-33. 8vo. Volume 77 and 78 bound in two uniform contemporary half cloth bindings with gilt lettering to spine. Volume 30 in a contemporary full cloth binding with black leather title-label to spine. Volume 78 and 78 with minor wear to spine, internally two very nice and clean copies. Volume 80 with wear to spine and minor overall soiling to extremities. Ex-library copy with library stamp [Bedford College] to pasted down front free end-paper and title page. Internally a clean copy. [Über den Bau der Atomkernen I, Vol. 77:] Pp. 1-11. [Über den Bau der Atomkernen II, Vol. 78:] Pp. 156-164. [Über den Bau der Atomkernen III, Vol. 80:] Pp. 587-596. [Entire volumes: VIII, 837 pp.; VIII, 857 pp.; VIII, 844 pp.]. First printing of Heisenberg's groundbreaking neutron-proton model. The three papers "mark the transition to the modern view on nuclear forces." (Pais. Inward Bound. P. 413). Shortly after Chadwick discovered the neutron in 1932, Heisenberg developed a theory suggesting that atomic nuclei are composed of protons and neutrons. This introduced the concept of the nuclear exchange force and isotopic spin."Soon after the discovery of the neutron in 1932 [By Chadwick], Heisenberg developed a neutron-proton model of the nucleus by introducing the concept of the nuclear exchange force and the formalism of isotopic spin. Nonrelativistic quantum mechanics could be applied to the nucleus, Heisenberg showed, as long as long as on did not consider the structure of nucleons. Heisenberg's work served as the basis for contemporary nuclear physics, of fields. In 1935 Heisenberg and his assistants, especially Weizsäcker. Heisenberg preferred to continue the search for a consistent quantum physics, much of which was pursued by his assistant Hans Euler discovered that nonlinear interactions in positron theory, which yielded photonphoton scattering, could be represented by treating the electron as possessing a minimum size, below which the interferences predominated." (DSB).Heisenberg played an important role in the unsuccessful attempt German attempt to build a nuclear reactor.The three volumes contain numerous important contributions by contemporary physicians. Seller Inventory # 44765
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 22.
Quantity Available: 1
From: Lynge & Søn ILAB-LILA (Copenhagen, Denmark)
About this Item: Berlin, J. Springer, 1932-33. 8vo. Bound together in recent attractive marbled boards. Leather title-label with gilt lettering on front board. Title-pages from the three volumes withbound (small rubberstamp). (11),(9),(12) pp. First edition of Heisenberg's neutron-proton model. Shortly after Chadwick discoverd the neutron in 1932, Heisenberg developed a theory suggesting that atomic nuclei are composed of protons and neutrons, -this introduced the concept of the nuclear exchange force and isotopic spin. (DSB 17: p.398). Seller Inventory # 26607
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 23.
Published by Belser-Presse, Stuttgart (1971)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Des livres autour (Julien Mannoni) (Paris, PARIS, France)
About this Item: Belser-Presse, Stuttgart, 1971. Cartonnage Éditeur. Condition: Très bon. Max Ernst (illustrator). Ed. originale. Stuttgart, Belser-Presse, 1971. 39,5 x 30 cm, in-folio, 79 pp. - 3 lithographies en couleurs hors texte, cartonnage et étui de l'éditeur en pleine toile bise, pièces de titre. Edition originale de cette conférence donnée à l'Académie bavaroise des Beaux-Arts de Munich le 9 juillet 1970. Texte bilingue allemand / anglais. Tirage à 205 exemplaires. Celui-ci l'un des 20 hors commerce, signé au colophon par Max Ernst. Les lithographies ont été tirées par Pierre Chave à Vence. Etui partiellement bruni, quelques infimes rousseurs à la tranche de gouttière. Signé par l'illustrateur. Seller Inventory # 1860
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 24.
Published by Julius Springer, Berlin (1922)
Quantity Available: 1
From: SOPHIA RARE BOOKS (Koebenhavn V, Denmark)
About this Item: Julius Springer, Berlin, 1922. First edition of Heisenberg’s first published paper, describing his ‘core model’ of the atom and its application to solve the problems of the multiplet structure in atomic spectra and the anomalous Zeeman effect, which had defeated all previous attempts. "Just a year after entering Sommerfeld’s program, Heisenberg amazed his teacher by presenting a model of atoms that seemed to resolve every spectroscopic riddle at a stroke. But the model succeeded only because its daring inventor failed to follow the requirements of an acceptable quantum theory" (Cassidy, Beyond Uncertainty, p. 95). Sommerfeld’s own attempt to solve the same problems precedes Heisenberg’s paper in the same issue."The Bohr theory of atoms and molecules, Sommerfeld’s "quantum theory of spectral lines," and the correspondence principle of 1918 formed the foundations of the Bohr quantum theory. This theory provided in turn the basis for model interpretations of most, but not all, existing phenomena of empirical spectroscopy. Two phenomena, multiplet line spectra and the anomalous Zeeman effect, continually resisted explanation by quantized mechanical models" (Cassidy, pp. 191-192). The eighteen-year-old Heisenberg entered Sommerfeld’s institute in the winter semester of 1920-21, and Sommerfeld immediately introduced him to the Bohr theory. In June 1921 Alfred Landé gave a phenomenological explanation of the splittings observed in the anomalous Zeeman effect, but he did not propose any physical interpretation of his theory, writing to Bohr: "With regard to the complicated types of the Zeeman effect, I have found a few empirical rules which permit one to make predictions regarding the neon spectrum. But what these rules signify is entirely incomprehensible to me." Sommerfeld suggested that Heisenberg should try to find a model to explain Landé’s rules. The result was the present paper, submitted in his third semester, when he was just twenty years old. "In it he claimed that he was presenting the essential details of a complete quantum-theoretical "model interpretation" of the empirical regularities of optical multiplet lines in spectroscopy and the anomalous Zeeman effect of these lines in a magnetic field. All previous attempts to explain these lines by mechanical models had failed The model was nevertheless riddled with what Max Born called "conscious deviations" from accepted principles and procedures. "Heisenberg, Sommerfeld’s "vastly gifted pupil," had reduced the previously inexplicable line structure to internal magnetic interactions between the valence electrons and the rest of the atom. The inner orbits and nucleus acted as a solid core possessing on the average a half-unit of angular momentum. Half-integral quantum numbers and magnetic interactions between orbital interactions between orbital electrons had already appeared in the work of Landé and others, but half-integral momenta and a magnetic core had not. They could not be justified in either classical or quantum theory, despite Sommerfeld’s blessing. "Although the model was theoretically untenable, with it Heisenberg could quantitatively account for doublet and triplet term energies. By attributing half-integral angular momenta to the valence electrons, he could also derive the semi-empirical Landé g-factors for the anomalous Zeeman effect and their continuous transition to unity in the Paschen-Back effect. "Heisenberg’s accomplishments were unique, but Bohr judged his "interesting paper" to be "hardly agreeable with the general assumptions" of quantum theory. Not only had Heisenberg introduced real non-integral momenta, but he had also violated the Sommerfeld quantum conditions, classical radiation theory, the Larmor precession theorem, and the semi-classical criterion of perceptual clarity (Anschaulichkeit) in model interpretations. The impact of these violations upon the rational advance of quantum theory spurred Bohr and others to try to derive Heisenberg’s results without straying too far f. Seller Inventory # 3527
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 25.
Published by Springer, Berlin (1926)
Quantity Available: 1
From: SOPHIA RARE BOOKS (Koebenhavn V, Denmark)
About this Item: Springer, Berlin, 1926. First edition of the explanation of the anomalous Zeeman effect on the basis of matrix mechanics. "By including the spin property of the electron, Heisenberg and Jordan obtained perhaps the greatest triumph of matrix mechanics: they were able to derive all observed phenomena connected with the anomalous Zeeman effect" (Rechenberg, p. 211). This paper was of crucial importance in the early history of quantum mechanics because its success in explaining the hitherto mysterious anomalous Zeeman effect validated not only the new quantum mechanics itself but also the highly controversial concept of electron spin, discovered by Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit in the previous year. When an atom is placed in a magnetic field, its spectral lines split into a series of equidistant lines – always an odd number - whose separation is proportional to the field strength. This, the normal Zeeman effect, was explained in 1916 by Debye and Sommerfeld in terms of the ‘old’ quantum theory: the splitting was due to the interaction between the magnetic field and the orbital magnetic moment of the electrons in the atom. However, there is also an anomalous Zeeman effect, observed particularly in atoms with odd atomic number, in which the lines split in a more complex fashion. "During 1920-24, many physicists attacked the problem [of the anomalous Zeeman effect], including Landé, who was able to give a phenomenological explanation of the observed splitting of spectral lines. However, neither Landé, Sommerfeld, Pauli, Heisenberg nor other physicists occupied with the problem could justify their results in terms of quantum theory. "It’s a great misery with the theory of anomalous Zeeman effect," Pauli wrote to Sommerfeld on July 19, 1923" (Kragh, p. 158). After Heisenberg’s introduction of matrix (quantum) mechanics in 1925, one of the first problems he wanted to address using his new theory was the anomalous Zeeman effect. The crucial ingredient was electron spin, which Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit had discovered by studying the regularities in the anomalous Zeeman effect documented by Landé. "Although based originally upon the classical concept of a rotating electron, electron spin is a purely quantum mechanical property intrinsic to the electron. Opinions were strongly divided about the validity of the concept, Pauli taking a strongly negative position, while Bohr, Heisenberg and Jordan took a more positive view. The challenge taken up by Heisenberg was to find a quantum mechanical solution for the anomalous Zeeman effect using the concept of a spin-½ particle within the context of their recently completed matrix formalism. "Despite the less than encouraging views of Pauli, in November 1925 Heisenberg set about [finding] the stationary states and line splittings associated with the anomalous Zeeman effect. Disappointingly, he almost reproduced Landé’s formula for the anomalous Zeeman effect, but the crucial spin-orbit coupling term resulted in a factor of 2 discrepancy from Landé’s expression, a result which cast doubt on the whole scheme. "The solution was, however, at hand thanks to the insight of Llewellyn Thomas who had arrived recently at Bohr’s Institute in Copenhagen as a visiting graduate student Thomas was aware of the fact that there is an additional kinematic effect associated with the orbital motion of a vector, such as the spin vector of the electron, according to the special theory of relativity This purely kinematic effect results in an additional contribution to the precession, and hence interaction energy of the electron and can account completely for the discrepant factor of 2. After considerable debate, even Pauli was convinced and the paper on the quantum mechanical explanation for the anomalous Zeeman effect was published by Heisenberg and Jordan in June 1926. Rechenberg has written in his summary of the history of quanta and quantum mechanics that the explanation of the anomalous Zeeman effect was one of the greatest triumphs of matrix mecha. Seller Inventory # 3528
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 26.
Published by Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (1985)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Secret Knowledge Books (Tualatin, OR, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1985. Hard Cover. Condition: Very Good. Dust Jacket Condition: Very Good. First Edition. 4 thick oversize volumes, XI, 633 pp; X, 717 pp; X, 700 pp; X, 937 pp. cloth hardcover with dustjacket, Heisenberg's complete published scientific papers, reproduced in facsimile, including several top secret papers on the Nazi nuclear project. Text in German and English. Slight un-evenness of the bookblock of serie A vols 2 and 3. A very good set, not ex-library copy. 8vo - over 7? - 9? tall. Seller Inventory # 001583
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 27.
Quantity Available: 1
From: Lynge & Søn ILAB-LILA (Copenhagen, Denmark)
About this Item: Berlin, Julius Springer, 1929 u. 1930. Bound in 2 contemp. uniform hcloth over marbled boards. A stamp to top of titlepages. Gilt lettering to spine. In: "Zeitschrift für Physik. Herausgegeben von Karl Scheel", 56. und 59. Band. VII,867 pp. u. VII,874 pp. (2 entire volumes offered). Heisenberg & Pauli's paper: pp. 1-61 a. pp. 168-190. Internally clean and fine. First appearance of these two papers of seminal importence as Heisenberg and Pauli here laid the foundation , by using a new method, for the quantum field theory, and gave the "relativistic formulation of quantum electrodynamics in the presence off charges and currents"(Pais). They were the first to attempt a general formulation of quantum electrodynamics by setting up a general scheme for the quantization of fields which they hoped would be applicable to the Maxwell field.In the papers they also introduced what is today called "gauge fixing", which from then on are among the precious tools of field theory."Heisenberg and Pauli thus established the basic structure of QFT which can be found in any introduction to QFT up to the present day" (Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy). Seller Inventory # 48182
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 28.
Published by Julius Springer, Berlin
Quantity Available: 1
From: Atticus Rare Books (West Branch, IA, U.S.A.)
About this Item: Julius Springer, Berlin. 1st Edition. FIRST EDITION, FIRST ISSUE OF TWO SEMINAL PAPERS: Heisenberg's groundbreaking contribution to magnetism and to the identification of the quantum mechanical exchange energy. A third paper of import appears in the 1928 volume, Jacov Frankel's collectivized model of the quantum theory of ferromagnetism. Heisenberg's model appears in the same volume, was submitted after Frenkel's, and presents the model of localized spins."Heisenberg's masterly contribution in magnetism lies in identifying the quantum mechanical exchange energy, first appearing in the context of chemical bonding and spectroscopy, to be of central importance in explaining ferromagnetism? The question was this: If every atom has an outer cloud of electrons, then how do atoms approach each other to form a chemical bond? It was Heisenberg who showed that the interaction between electrons, called the exchange energy," was the key (ibid., 60). His "exchange interaction" is a force generated solely by the exchange of positions of two totally indistinguishable quantum particles - "a quantum mechanical effect which increases or decreases the expectation value of the energy or distance between two or more identical particles when their wave functions overlap" (Wikipedia). In the early 20th century physicists did not understand ferromagnetism on an atomic basis. "It was Heisenberg's work in the late 1920's that filled this void. To accomplish this, quantum mechanics had to be discovered first? It was indeed in the fitness of things that the quantum dynamics of the electron left an imprint on another area, namely magnetism, which too had to do with the magnetic effects of electron dynamics" (ibid., 58). What Heisenberg began to understand was the connection between ferromagnetism and electron bonding, two areas that most physicists believed were wholly unconnected phenomena. "It was Heisenberg, who saw the connection and established it in two seminal papers, written in 1926 and 1928 [the two papers offered here]" (Chatterjee, "Heisenberg and Ferromagnetism," Resonance, 2004, 63-64).WITH BOUND, FRENKEL'S " Elementare Theorie magnetischer und elektrischer Eigenschaften der Metalle beim absoluten Nullpunkt der Temperatur"(Fenkel, pp. 31-45) in Zeitschrift für Physik Vol. 49, 1928, pp. 31-45. Frankel's paper, 'On the Magnetic and Electrical Properties of Metals at Absolute Zero' speculates "that a spontaneous magnetic moment can appear as a consequence of a coupling arising from Heisenberg's resonance phenomenon between the individual spin moments of the free electrons, and between the spin vectors of the free and bound electrons, 'yielding, in certain circumstances, an unusually large negative value for the 'magnetic' energy. However, unlike Heisenberg, Frenkel did not develop this suggestion into a quantitative theory. No mention of Frankel's paper appears either in Heisenberg's publications or in his letters to Pauli" (Hoddeson, Out of the Crystal Maze, 132). CONDITION & DETAILS: Berlin: Julius Springer. 4to. (9 x 6.5 inches; 225 x 163mm). Two full volumes. Zeitschrift für Physik Volumes 39 and 49. Handsomely bound in black cloth over marbled paper boards; library labels removed with slight ghosting visible. Very minor rubbing at the edges on Volume 39. Both tightly and solidly bound. Near pristine throughout the interior. Seller Inventory # 217
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 29.
Published by Julius Springer, Berlin (1926)
Quantity Available: 1
From: Milestones of Science Books (Ritterhude, Germany)
About this Item: Julius Springer, Berlin, 1926. Soft cover. Condition: Very Good. 1st Edition. Offprint from: Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 95, Nr. 5. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1926, pp. 683-705. Bound without wrapper; titel page torn at inner margin. Seller Inventory # 001727
More information about this seller | Contact this seller 30.