A Separate Creation. How Biology Makes Us Gay.

Burr, Chandler.

ISBN 10: 0593035526 / ISBN 13: 9780593035528

Published by Bantam, London, 1996

About this Item

ix, 354pp, index, glossary, notes, few diagrams. Or orangle cloth in jacket. Small remainder dot on bottom edge, page edges and margins toned. Jacket with short tear at bottom of front flap fold. Explores the biological basis of homosexuality. Size: 8vo. Seller Inventory # 031397

Bibliographic Details

Title: A Separate Creation. How Biology Makes Us ...

Publisher: Bantam, London

Publication Date: 1996

Binding: Hard Cover

Condition: Very Good

Dust Jacket Condition: Near Very Good

Edition: First UK Edition.

About this title

Synopsis:

In 1993 American scientists claimed they had discovered a gay gene. Sexual orientation it seems, is not a choice, disease or faddish whim but a fundamental biological part of who we are. This book examines this claim, looking at the laboratories where researchers are using incredible new technologies to discover what makes us gay of straight. From studies of male rats that ovulate and a species of African animal where the female has a penis, to the political storm surrounding the claim of a gay gene, from a silicon chip of human DNA that could determine the sexual orientation of a foetus in the womb, to a working theory that homosexuality is a genetic/biological condition that is treatable with an antibiotic, the book explores this often ethically ambiguous territory.

Review:

If there is one lesson to be taken away from reading this report on "the search for the biological origins of sexual orientation," it's that science at its best is always an ongoing process. Combining profiles of the top researchers of sexual orientation with straightforward explanations of the results of their experiments in neurobiology, genetics, and other fields, Burr provides a fascinating glimpse of men and women for whom science is not the pursuit of definitive answers about the way things are, but the motivation for constant questions. He also gives them a voice to vent frustration at the ways their research has been misrepresented by non-scientists trying to fit objective data into subjective moral and ethical arguments.