From the acclaimed Civil War historian, a brilliant new history—the most intimate and richly readable account we have had—of the climactic three-day battle of Gettysburg (July 1–3, 1863), which draws the reader into the heat, smoke, and grime of Gettysburg alongside the ordinary soldier, and depicts the combination of personalities and circumstances that produced the greatest battle of the Civil War, and one of the greatest in human history.
Of the half-dozen full-length histories of the battle of Gettysburg written over the last century, none dives down so closely to the experience of the individual soldier, or looks so closely at the sway of politics over military decisions, or places the battle so firmly in the context of nineteenth-century military practice. Allen C. Guelzo shows us the face, the sights, and the sounds of nineteenth-century combat: the lay of the land, the fences and the stone walls, the gunpowder clouds that hampered movement and vision; the armies that caroused, foraged, kidnapped, sang, and were so filthy they could be smelled before they could be seen; the head-swimming difficulties of marshaling massive numbers of poorly trained soldiers, plus thousands of animals and wagons, with no better means of communication than those of Caesar and Alexander.
What emerges is an untold story, from the trapped and terrified civilians in Gettysburg’s cellars to the insolent attitude of artillerymen, from the taste of gunpowder cartridges torn with the teeth to the sounds of marching columns, their tin cups clanking like an anvil chorus. Guelzo depicts the battle with unprecedented clarity, evoking a world where disoriented soldiers and officers wheel nearly blindly through woods and fields toward their clash, even as poetry and hymns spring to their minds with ease in the midst of carnage. Rebel soldiers look to march on Philadelphia and even New York, while the Union struggles to repel what will be the final invasion of the North. One hundred and fifty years later, the cornerstone battle of the Civil War comes vividly to life as a national epic, inspiring both horror and admiration.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Allen C. Guelzo is the Henry R. Luce Professor of the Civil War Era and Director of Civil War Era Studies at Gettysburg College. He is the author of Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America and Abraham Lincoln: Redeemer President, both winners of the Lincoln Prize. Guelzo’s essays, reviews, and articles have appeared in publications ranging from T he American Historical Review and The Wilson Quarterly to newspapers such as The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Wall Street Journal.Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.:
In the two-and-a-half decades after the battle of Gettysburg, the Union veterans who survived to tell the tale were nearly unanimous in the declaration that the key to the battle depended on holding one very important hill. The puzzle for most modern students of the battle is why, with one consent, those veterans seemed to choose the wrong hill.
For the present generation of battlefield tourists, the most important hill on the battlefield is the cone-shaped moraine known as Little Round Top. Oddly, this was not the name by which it was known at the time of the battle. People referred to it variously as Wolf’s Hill, Sugar Loaf, or simply the “rocky hill,” and after the battle, John B. Bachelder (who set himself up almost at once as the official chronicler of Gettysburg) tried to fix the name “Weed’s Hill” to it, in honor of the most senior Union officer killed there during the battle, Stephen Weed. But Little Round Top it became, and Little Round Top it stayed, although even then it played a strictly back-seat role in the imaginations of the battle’s veterans. It was not until the 1890s when curiosity began to shift in Little Round Top’s direction, and not for another eighty years – after Michael Shaara’s The Killer Angels – that Little Round Top suddenly blossomed into the key to the entire battle. From that point, and up through the Ronald Maxwell movie epic, Gettysburg, Little Round Top was transformed into “the key of the field in front beyond a doubt,” and popular historians upped the ante to the point where “they saved the Union at Little Round Top.”
In particular, it has been Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain and the 20th Maine’s last-chance bayonet charge on Little Round Top on July 2nd which have taken most of the laurels for guaranteeing that salvation. Certainly, the stand of the 20th Maine makes for great drama in the midst of great drama. As the left-flank regiment of Col. Strong Vincent’s four-regiment brigade, Chamberlain’s 20th Maine held off at least two major rebel infantry attacks in their front that afternoon, and then, when their ammunition was virtually gone, fixed bayonets and charged downhill, surprising and scattering the rebels. It was a beau geste straight out of the story-books. The fact that Chamberlain had, only a year before, been an unheralded professor of rhetoric at Bowdon College made the charge all the more amazing: an amateur, in command of amateurs, somehow made not only the right call, but the most daring call that could have been made, and succeeded. Chamberlain’s story appealed to that deep streak of American self-reliance—that confidence in improvisation, that can-do spirit that trumps overly-intellectualized and hidebound European ways of doing things. That Chamberlain was a highly-intellectualized individual himself was beside the point.
It takes nothing away from the tenacity of the fighting – the last-minute arrivals, the desperate and sometimes hand-to-hand combat, the just-in-time swing and flow of the action – to say that the drama of Little Round Top has been allowed to run away with the reality. But looked at coldly, the real credit for defending Little Round Top belongs less to Chamberlain and the 20th Maine, and more to three others who have largely faded from attention: Gouverneur Warren, the Army of the Potomac’s chief engineer, who spotted rebel infantry swarming in the direction of the otherwise undefended hill and sent off gallopers to beg or borrow any troops they could find...Strong Vincent, who took his professional standing in his own hands, brought his brigade up to Little Round Top without authorization from his division commander, and organized its defense...and Patrick O’Rorke, who also bolted at Warren’s call and brought his 140th New York up and over the crest of Little Round Top just in time to shove an even more serious Confederate attack back down the slopes. Unhappily, O’Rorke was killed in the charge and Strong Vincent was shot through the groin and died after four days of suffering. Gouverneur Warren would outlive the battle, only to be pilloried for misconduct at Five Forks in 1865. That left Chamberlain as the best candidate for laurel-wearing. And he was not an unworthy candidate, either. He would survive three wounds in 1864 (one of them near-fatal), win the Congressional Medal of Honor, end the war as a major-general, serve four terms as governor of Maine and as president of Bowdoin. Even more important, he would publish at least seven accounts of Little Round Top, giving himself the starring role, and giving Little Round Top the starring role in the battle as the last extension of the Union Left flank.
Other veterans of Vincent’s brigade were not impressed: “Chamberlain,” complained Porter Farley of the 140th New York, “is a professional talker and I am told rather imaginative withal.” And the truth is that Chamberlain’s charge was only one of several such spoiling attacks that day, and Little Round Top was more of an outpost than the real flank of the Union line. It was the ex-professor’s considerable flair for self-promotion which vaulted him ahead of the others.
Nor is it entirely clear that Little Round Top quite deserved the role Chamberlain attached to it. The puffing of Joshua Chamberlain and the 20th Maine is a subset of the larger problem of glamorizing Little Round Top itself. Charles Hazlett, yet another forgotten player on the hill that day who manhandled his six 10-pounder Parrott rifles “by hand and handspike” up through the tangled trees and underbrush of the hill, warned Gouverneur Warren that Little Round Top didn’t afford much in the way of an artillery platform. The cone of the hill crested in a narrow spine which offered very little room for the deployment of artillery, and only permitted a line of fire facing west. Both Warren and Hazlett agreed that Little Round Top “was no place for efficient artillery fire—both of us knew that.” Hazlett only took the trouble to get up there because he hoped that “the sound of my guns will be encouraging to our troops and disheartening to the others.”
Defending Little Round Top may even have endangered more than it protected the Union position at Gettysburg. The great Confederate attack on July 2nd had never been designed to seize Little Round Top in the first place; the plan laid down by both Robert E. Lee and James Longstreet was to swing a gigantic, curling blow up the Emmitsburg Road into the rear of Cemetery Hill, and brush past the “rocky hill.” When Gouverneur Warren began pulling, first Vincent’s Brigade, then O’Rorke’s regiment, then the balance of Stephen Weed’s brigade, up to Little Round Top, he was actually subtracting units which were intended to reinforce the Union line along the Emmitsburg Road, and thus made it all the easier for James Longstreet’s rebels to land the real blow of the afternoon. The Confederates who scrambled up Little Round Top were only there because they had wandered off-course during the attack, and probably would have made no difference to the overall outcome of events on July 2nd – except, of course, that they induced Union commanders like Warren to siphon-off troops which could have been used to shore-up the Emmitsburg Road. As it was, the thinly-spread Union troops along the Emmitsburg Road were crushed by Longstreet’s sledgehammer, and the Army of the Potomac was nearly brought to its knees. Had Longstreet succeeded in seizing Cemetery Hill, we would today be blaming, rather than celebrating, Warren, Chamberlain and O’Rorke for allowing themselves to be distracted by a useless piece of rocky real estate.
Because, in the end, it really was Cemetery Hill, not Little Round Top, which was the key, something the veterans of the battle attested to in the years after the war by making their pilgrimages to Cemetery Hill, not Little Round Top. Unlike the narrow spine of Little Round Top, Cemetery Hill was a broad, flat plateau, with the ideal elevation for the siting of artillery (which was, normally, 1% of the distance to the target and never greater than 7% of the distance) and plenty of back-space to accommodate limber chests, caissons, horse-teams and battery wagons. And although modern visitors to Cemetery Hill can get no idea of this because of the foliage that has grown up there since 1863, a four-negative panorama taken from Cemetery Hill in 1869 by the local Gettysburg photographers William Tipton and Robert Myers shows a dramatically uncluttered viewshed to the west, north and south. Cemetery Hill, in other words, constituted an artillerists’ dream. It was enough “to make an artilleryman grow enthusiastic,” wrote one Pennsylvania officer. “This high ground which dominated the town and the fields in all directions, save one” (to the east) gave to an artillerists’ eye “an unobstructed view of the rolling country open and accessible to the fire of our guns.” Even Confederate observers admitted that Cemetery Hill was “made, one might say, for artillery.”
So long as the Army of the Potomac held Cemetery Hill, it had a position from which its massed artillery could decimate any infantry Robert E. Lee attempted to throw at it – in fact, did decimate it during Pickett’s Charge on July 3rd. And so long as it held Cemetery Hill, it also gripped the Baltimore Pike, the principal life-line to its railhead and supply base in Maryland. Losing Little Round Top would not have won the battle for Lee, or lost it for the Union. Cemetery Hill would have, though, which is why, after the battle, the Soldiers’ National Cemetery was created on Cemetery Hill, why the first battlefield observation tower was built on Cemetery Hill, and why the first veterans’ encampments were held on Cemetery Hill. It would take another generation to forget Cemetery Hill’s importance, and the combination of a very gifted self-advertiser and a very gifted novelist to replace it with “the rocky hill.”
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Book Description Alfred A. Knopf, 2013. Hardcover. Book Condition: New. Hardcover and dust jacket. Good binding and cover. Clean, unmarked pages. Ships daily. Bookseller Inventory # 1703070007
Book Description Bloomsbury Press, 2013. Hardcover. Book Condition: New. 1st U.S. edition, 1st printing. 1st U.S. edition, 1st printing of this brand new hardcover with dustjacket, gift quality. Bookseller Inventory # 50989
Book Description Alfred A. Knopf, 2013. Hardcover. Book Condition: New. book. Bookseller Inventory # 0307594084
Book Description Alfred A. Knopf, Borzoi Books, Random House, Inc., New York, 2013. Hardcover. Book Condition: New. Dust Jacket Condition: New. 1st Edition. MARVELOUS: FRESH: FASCINATING: COMPELLING: PROVOCATIVE: PANORAMIC: INTIMATE: NEW hardcover, stated First Edition, 1st issue (May 2012), NEW unclipped mylar-protected jacket w new edges & corners & orig. $35.00 price at top right inside front flyleaf, immaculate text-block exterior w smooth-cut top & bottom edges & cut-page-style deckle side-edging, handsome new cover w library-durable blue linen wrapping spine & extending 1.50" onto front & back panels covered in excellent gray paper w new edges & corners & w titles handsomely gold-stamped on spine, new sewn binding w tight signatures & blue & white-checked cloth-bands at spine-caps, immaculate white end-papers, pristine interior handsomely printed in Adobe Garamond on excellent paper, superb presentation of end-notes & other scholarly apparatus * Acknowledgments (xi), Prologue (3), Epilogue (475), Notes (483), Index (601) * 39 b-w maps by Robert Bull * Two 8 pp. inserts of b-w photos & drawings on matte-gloss laminated paper, after p.170: 22 illus. after p. 330: 24 illus. * 6.50" x 9.50" x 1.68", 1.12 kg, xx+632 (652) pp. * From acclaimed Civil War historian Allen Guekzo, a brilliant new history, the most intimate & richly readable we have, of the climactic 3-day battle of Gettysburg, draws the reader into the heat, smoke & grime of war alongside the ordinary soldier, & depicts the combination of personalities & circumstances that produced the greatest battle of the Civil War, & one of the greatest in human history. Of the half-dozen full-length histories of Gettysburg written over the past century, none so closely depicts the experience of the individual soldier, or looks so closely at the sway of politics over military decisions, or places the battle so firmly in the context of 19th-century military practice. Allen C. Guelzo shows us the face, the sights, & the sounds of 19th-century combat: the lay of the land, the fences & stone walls, the gunpowder clouds that hampered movement & vision; the armies that caroused & sang, foraged & kidnapped, & were so filthy they could be smelled before they could be seen; the head-swimming difficulties of marshalling massive numbers of poorly trained soldiers, plus 1000s of animals & wagons, w/ no better means of communication than those of Caesar & Alexander. From the terrified citizens trapped in Gettysburg's cellars to the insolent attitude of artillerymen, from the taste of tooth-torn gunpowder cartridges to the sounds of marching columns, their tin cups clanking like a chorus of anvils, Guelzo depicts the battle w/ sharp clarity, evoking a world where disoriented soldiers & officers wheel nearly blindly through woods & fields toward mortal clashes even as poetry & hymns spring to their minds in the midst of carnage. More than 150 years later, Guelzo brings the climactic battle vividly to life in all its horror, in all its inspiring courage & devotion. * Henry R. Luce Professor of the Civil War Era & Director of Civil War Studies at Gettysburg College, Allen C. Guelzo is the author of many award-winning books, essays & articles. * "deft & scholarly, fresh, fascinating, & compellingly provocative, a marvelous book . . . " - Jay Winik, author of 'April 1965' * "A panoramic yet astonishingly intimate account that interweaves the drama of battle w/ original, & often provocative, insights into the ways in which topography, weaponry & the politics & personalities of its protagonists shaped events. This is, simply, the best book about Gettysburg that has yet been written. It is hard if not impossible to imagine that there will ever be a better one." - Fergus M. Bordewich, author of 'America's Great Debate' * We custom wrap & package this superb book in a specially cut & fitted multi-walled carton for shipment via USPS Media Mail at no charge (or via USPS Priority Mail for a nominal $8.00 charge) within the United States or at our posted rates to international destinations via USPS First Class Airmail (recommended) or USPS Priority Airmail. Bookseller Inventory # 007746
Book Description Alfred A. Knopf. Hardcover. Book Condition: New. 0307594084 *BRAND NEW* Ships Same Day or Next!. Bookseller Inventory # SWATI2121945303
Book Description Random House USA Inc 2013-05-14, 2013. hardback. Book Condition: New. Bookseller Inventory # 9780307594082
Book Description Alfred A. Knopf, 2013. Hardcover. Book Condition: New. Bookseller Inventory # P110307594084
Book Description Alfred A. Knopf. Hardcover. Book Condition: New. 0307594084 New Condition. Bookseller Inventory # NEW6.1085410
Book Description Alfred A. Knopf, 2013. Book Condition: new. Shiny and new! Expect delivery in 20 days. Bookseller Inventory # 9780307594082-1