About the Author:
Adam Steinhouse has taught at the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge and at the London School of Economics. He is currently Senior Lecturer in European Government at the U.K. Civil Service College.
Review:
A must read for anyone interested in labor history in the postwar period. Steinhouse focuses on the crucial period of 1944-48 when the "rules of the game" of labor relations are worked out for the decades to come. Based on meticulous research in the relevant archives, he sketches out the tripartite relationship that develops between the unions, the state, and the business community in great detail. It is a story where the hopes, after the Liberation, for a more peaceful relationship between capital and labor are dashed. (Judith E. Vichniac, Harvard University)
The campaign to give French workers a new role in the workplace epitomized the high hopes and idealism of the Liberation. Adam Steinhouse has made an important contribution to understanding what became of the reformist élan of 1944. In this thoroughly researched and very able work, Steinhouse shows that the disappointment of Liberation aspirations was no straightforward betrayal. His analysis exposes a steady retreat from activism on the part of state officials, a stubborn resistance to change on the part of employers, and a lukewarm commitment on the part of the main trade union confederation and the powerful Communist party. This carefully reasoned and convincing study breaks new ground and will be of considerable interest to historians of postwar France. (Andrew Shennan, Wellesley College)
Through meticulous archival research and deft analysis, Adam Steinhouse explains why new forms of worker participation held such radical promise after the Liberation of France in 1944 only to become innocuous a few years later. He brings under tough but fair scrutiny the powerful employers who proved fiercely determined to reassert their old authority, as well as the leftwing government officials, politicians, and trade unionists who failed to take full advantage of a unique opportunity to strengthen the collective voice of labor in the French workplace. This is an important contribution to French history and to the general study of industrial relations. (Herrick Chapman, New York University)
A fresh and lucid analysis of an exceptional moment, combining the best practices of history and political science. (Robert Gildea, Merton College, Oxford University)
Adam Steinhouse's book is an important work that deserves to be read by all those interested in business, unions, and the state, and indeed by anyone concerned with the political and economic history of postwar Europe. (Richard C. Vinen, Kings College London)
Adam Steinhouse's book provides a good overview of the crucial period 1944 to 1948, when the basic institutions and patterns of labor relations were set for what turned out to be the next forty years. His use of the archives of the Ministry of Labor, prefect reports and Prime Minister's cabinet details the give-and-take process. In the end, although workers were far more represented in the workplace and the state than before the war, this was qualitatively less than in fuller corporatist set-ups like Sweden and Germany. (John Barzman, University of Le Havre)
This study is thouroughly researched, it engages critically with the existing literature and is convincingly argued. (American Political Science Review)
Steinhouse has written a clear and convincing analysis of the main reasons for the exceptionally low level of workers' representation in postwar France. (Economic History Review)
Steinhouse is unquestionably a fine scholar who asks important questions. His work reveals the key role of the state in supporting and constraining workers' collective and individual actions. (Journal of Modern History)
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.