Civil libertarians characterize prostitution as a "victimless crime," and argue that it ought to be legalized. Feminist critics counter that prostitution is not victimless, since it harms the people who do it. Civil libertarians respond that most women freely choose to do this work, and that it is paternalistic for the government to limit a person's liberty for her own good. In this book Peter de Marneffe argues that although most prostitution is voluntary, paternalistic prostitution laws in some form are nonetheless morally justifiable. If prostitution is commonly harmful in the way that feminist critics maintain, then this argument for prostitution laws is not objectionably moralistic and some prostitution laws violate no one's rights. Paternalistic prostitution laws in some form are therefore consistent with the fundamental principles of contemporary liberalism.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Peter deMarneffe is Professor of Philosophy, Head of Faculty of Philosophy, School of Historical, Philosophical, and Religious Studies, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University.
"Philosophically distinctive and empirically well-supported. It deserves to be taken very seriously in any subsequent discussion of prostitution."--Analysis
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping:
US$ 5.45
Within U.S.A.
Seller: The Compleat Scholar, Rochester, NY, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condition: As New. Never read, no marks or highlighting in the book. Our copy is hardback with a dust jacket, showing light shelf-wear. Seller Inventory # 21-1203-136-66
Quantity: 1 available