In contemporary philosophy, substantive moral theories are typically classified as either consequentialist or deontological. Standard consequentialist theories insist, roughly, that agents must always act so as to produce the best available outcomes overall. Standard deontological theories, by contrast, maintain that there are some circumstances where one is permitted but not required to produce the best overall results, and still other circumstances in which one is positively forbidden to do so. Classical utilitarianism is the most familiar consequentialist view, but it is widely regarded as an inadequate account of morality. Although Samuel Scheffler agrees with this assessment, he also believes that consequentialism seems initially plausible, and that there is a persistent air of paradox surrounding typical deontological views. In this book, therefore, he undertakes to reconsider the rejection of consequentialism. He argues that it is possible to provide a rationale for the view that agents need not always produce the best possible overall outcomes, and this motivates one departure from consequentialism; but he shows that it is surprisingly difficult to provide a satisfactory rationale for the view that there are times when agents must not produce the best possible overall outcomes. He goes on to argue for a hitherto neglected type of moral conception, according to which agents are always permitted, but not always required, to produce the best outcomes.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Samuel Scheffler, Professor of Philosophy, University of California, Berkeley.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
US$ 5.75 shipping within U.S.A.
Destination, rates & speedsSeller: Recycle Bookstore, San Jose, CA, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condition: Good +. Dust Jacket Condition: Very Good. Priced As-Is! Photos available upon request! Book has light bumping to edges of spine and corners and mild underlining and annotating to various pages throughout; dust jacket has light rubbing to edges of cover and spine, light sunfading to spine and edges of cover near hinge, and mild rubbing to cover. otherwise book is in good condition with a bright cover, a solid binding, and now mylar laminated. Would be in very good condition if there was no underlining and annotating. Seller Inventory # 1032085
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Midtown Scholar Bookstore, Harrisburg, PA, U.S.A.
hardcover. Condition: Good. Some pencil markings. Torn/worn dj. Good hardcover with some shelfwear; may have previous owner's name inside. Standard-sized. Seller Inventory # mon0000198905
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 1689273-n
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # ABLIING23Feb2215580040917
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: Brook Bookstore On Demand, Napoli, NA, Italy
Condition: new. Questo è un articolo print on demand. Seller Inventory # d7f8f0c2d1deeb83cbb255212124f1d9
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: Grand Eagle Retail, Mason, OH, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. In contemporary philosophy, substantive moral theories are typically classified as either consequentialist or deontological. Standard consequentialist theories insist, roughly, that agents must always act so as to produce the best available outcomes overall. Standard deontological theories, by contrast, maintain that there are some circumstances where one is permitted but not required to produce the best overall results, and still other circumstances in which oneis positively forbidden to to do.Classical utilitarianism is the most familiar consequentialist view, but it is widely regarded as an inadequate account of morality. AlthoughProfessor Scheffler agrees with this assessment, he also believes that consequentialism seems initially plausible, and that there is a persistent air of paradox surrounding typical deontological views. In this book, therefore, he undertakes to reconsider the rejection of consequentialism.He argues that it is possible to provide a rationale for the view that agents need not always produce the best possible overall outcomes, and this motivates one departure fromconsequentialism; but he shows that it is surprisingly difficult to provide a satisfactory rationale for the view that there are times when agents must not produce the best possible overall outcomes. He goes onto argue for a hitherto neglected type of moral conception, according to which agents are always permitted, but not always required, to produce the best outcomes. A new edition the reconsideration of the case against consequentialism supplemented with three subsequently published essays in which he responds to criticism of the original text and further develops various of its themes and arguments. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9780198235101
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, United Kingdom
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 1689273-n
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, United Kingdom
Hardback. Condition: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days. 427. Seller Inventory # B9780198235101
Quantity: 15 available
Seller: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
HRD. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # L1-9780198235101
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
HRD. Condition: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # L1-9780198235101
Quantity: Over 20 available