The Electoral College Primer 2000 - Softcover

Longley, Professor Lawrence D.; Peirce, Mr. Neal R.

3.87

15 ratings by Goodreads

9780300080360: The Electoral College Primer 2000

Softcover

ISBN 10: 0300080360 ISBN 13: 9780300080360

Publisher: Yale University Press, 1999

View all copies of this ISBN edition:

A guide to how the US electoral system works - and sometimes misfires. At its best, the authors reveal, the electoral college distorts campaign strategy and poorly represents the popular will. At its worst, it can create political and constitutional crisis.

"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.

Review:

"One man, one vote" may be a familiar democratic motto, but it hardly applies to American presidential elections. That's because of the United States' bizarre electoral college system, which makes it possible for candidates who finish second in the popular vote to triumph in the electoral count. In fact, this has happened at least twice (1876 and 1888). On two other occasions (1800 and 1824), the House of Representatives picked the president when nobody won an electoral-college majority. Thomas Jefferson once described this circumstance as "the most dangerous blot on our Constitution." In the brief but comprehensive Electoral College Primer 2000, Lawrence D. Longley and Neal R. Peirce show why Jefferson's assessment was right on target. They have a keen understanding of the electoral college's vulnerabilities. Through a few simple calculations, for example, they show that Californians have more than two-and-a-half times the voting power of Montana residents. More alarming, however, they describe how a small shift in the popular vote can enact a huge change in the electoral college outcome. They count 22 "hairbreadth elections" in American history, including the 1960 race between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon--if 8,971 votes in Illinois and Missouri had switched from Kennedy to Nixon that year, the result would have been an electoral college deadlock. It's amazing the system has held up as well as it has over the years; Longley and Peirce persuasively argue that it's only a matter of time before it breaks down completely. --John J. Miller

From Library Journal:

Part of the Yale "Fastback" series, which is dedicated to publishing topics of current interest as soon as possible, this primer in this election year fits right in with that theme. Longley (government, Lawrence Univ.) and Peirce, a poltical journalist, offer a detailed analysis of the electoral college system. The first chapter begins with a hypothetical account of this year's presidential election. Bob Dole has won the popular election but is short on the necessary 270 electoral votes. Ross Perot is the spoiler, and Bill Clinton is left scrambling for electoral votes. If he's successful, he becomes the fourth man to win the presidency without the popular vote. The authors then discuss how the electoral college has changed with the passage of time and how little it resembles the Founding Fathers' original intent. Including tabular data on all previous presidential elections, this thorough examination of past and potential electoral college pitfalls is recommended for academic collections.?Alan Schroeder, Southern California Univ. for Professional Studies, Santa Ana
Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc.

"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.