Considerations On The Questions Of Law Involved In The Decisions Of The Court Of Session And House Of Lords, In The Case Of John Vans Agnew. Against James Stewart. & Ebenezer Drew by Archibald Swinton. This historical legal treatise analyzes the principles and methods by which Scottish entails were devised and enforced to secure a family estate against the encroachments of creditors and future debts. Swinton surveys the origin of prohibitory, irritant, and resolutive clauses, traces their development through early feudal practice and the 1685 statute, and discusses key cases (the Stormont decision, the Edmonstone and Roxburghe lines, and the Callender/Court decisions) to explain how entails were made effective against third parties. He deliberates whether an entail made by the Institute against himself can bind future creditors, distinguishes between institutor and substitutes, and argues that publication and infeftment (besides registration) are essential to render the limitations operative. The work stands as a rigorous argument for the enduring relevance of common-law principles within statutory regulation of tailzies in Scotland.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # LX-9780461575217
Quantity: 15 available
Seller: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, United Kingdom
Paperback / softback. Condition: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days. Seller Inventory # B9780461575217
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: moluna, Greven, Germany
Condition: New. KlappentextrnrnThis is a reproduction of the original artefact. Generally these books are created from careful scans of the original. This allows us to preserve the book accurately and present it in the way the author intended. Since the origina. Seller Inventory # 2145183814
Quantity: Over 20 available