Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science.
How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Peter Galison is Mallinckrodt Professor of the History of Science and of Physics at Harvard University. He is the editor, with Bruce Hevly, of Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. David J. Stump is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of San Francisco.
“This is a very important work, with contributions by many of the most prominent scholars in science studies....It actually delivers on its promise to renew discussion and develop fresh ideas about the allegation that the sciences are no longer (or never were) unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation.” —Michael Lynch, Brunel University
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: Rothwell & Dunworth (ABA, ILAB), Dulverton, United Kingdom
1st edn. 8vo. Original silver lettered black cloth (boards lightly bowed - otherwise VG), dustwrapper (VG in protective cover). Pp. xiv + 567 (no inscriptions). Seller Inventory # 193431
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Plurabelle Books Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Series: Writing Science. xiv 567p hardback, grey/purple dustjacket, a fresh copy, very good, no traces of use Language: English. Seller Inventory # 172795
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: College Campus, Sturgeon Lake, MN, U.S.A.
Condition: Good. Used Item. Does not include New Access Codes , Cd's or one time use items that come when New. This item is Used. Seller Inventory # 080472562413122-KEPA-1213230690
Seller: Zed Books, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condition: Near Fine. Dust Jacket Condition: Near Fine. 1st Edition. First printing. 8vo. 567 pp. Black cloth. Near Fine in Near Fine dust jacket. Slight shelfwear to boards. Crease to jacket's rear flap. Seller Inventory # h00569
Seller: Rarewaves USA, OSWEGO, IL, U.S.A.
Hardback. Condition: New. Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner. Seller Inventory # LU-9780804724364
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 252805-n
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
HRD. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # FW-9780804724364
Quantity: 15 available
Seller: Brook Bookstore On Demand, Napoli, NA, Italy
Condition: new. Seller Inventory # a4a7df9a5b51f2d30e148576d7bb7a9a
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition. Seller Inventory # 252805
Seller: Majestic Books, Hounslow, United Kingdom
Condition: New. pp. 584. Seller Inventory # 3554075
Quantity: 3 available