Communications scholars from the University of Amsterdam and of Arizona analyze argumentation in ordinary disputes. They present an ideal model, and show how it works in an ideal situation, such as a dispute about the merits of two opposing cases. Then they start looking at the real world: ordinary conversation, third-party mediation, religious confrontations, cases in which at least one of the participants is not looking for resolution, and so on. Accessible to nonspecialists. Annotation copyright Book News, Inc. Portland, Or.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Normal0falsefalsefalseMicrosoftInternetExplorer4
Frans H. van Eemeren is Professor of Discourse and Argumentation Studies and Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Humanities at the University of Amsterdam.Rob Grootendorst is Associate Professor of Discourse and Argumentation Studies and Chair of the Department of Speech Communication at the University of Amsterdam.Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs are Associate Professors of Communication at the University of Arizona.
"The book, ... a fruitful collaboration between leading scholars in the field, advances a comprehensive and timely program for sutdies of argumentation .... By reason of its scope and the power of its own argumentation, Reconstructiong Argumentatvie Discourse ought to be recognized as occupying a commanding position among studies of argumentation."—Argumentation
Normal0falsefalsefalseMicrosoftInternetExplorer4
“A pioneering work.... The authors show that there is much to be gained from reconciling descriptive and normative approaches to the study of argumentation.” –Joseph W. Wenzel, University of Illinois-Urbana
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: Bookmans, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condition: Acceptable. Satisfaction 100% guaranteed. Seller Inventory # mon0001051576