This study investigates the three main waves of political regime contention in Europe and Latin America. Surprisingly, protest against authoritarian rule spread across countries more quickly in the nineteenth century, yet achieved greater success in bringing democracy in the twentieth. To explain these divergent trends, the book draws on cognitive-psychological insights about the inferential heuristics that people commonly apply; these shortcuts shape learning from foreign precedents such as an autocrat's overthrow elsewhere. But these shortcuts had different force, depending on the political-organizational context. In the inchoate societies of the nineteenth century, common people were easily swayed by these heuristics: Jumping to the conclusion that they could replicate such a foreign precedent in their own countries, they precipitously challenged powerful rulers, yet often at inopportune moments - and with low success. By the twentieth century, however, political organizations had formed. Their leaders had better capacities for information processing, were less strongly affected by cognitive shortcuts, and therefore waited for propitious opportunities before initiating contention. As organizational ties loosened the bounds of rationality, contentious waves came to spread less rapidly, but with greater success.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Based on a wealth of historical sources and field research in Brazil, Chile, and Peru, this wide-ranging study examines the three main waves of contention against autocratic rulers in Europe and Latin America: the revolutions of 1848, the protests stimulated by the Russian Revolution of 1917, and the efforts to unseat Latin America's military dictators in the 1970s and 1980s. This study draws on cognitive-psychological insights and political-organizational theory to explain why conflict spread more quickly from country to country in the nineteenth century, yet achieved more progress toward democracy in the twentieth century.
Kurt Weyland is the Lozano Long Professor of Latin American Politics and professor of government at the University of Texas, Austin. He received his PhD in political science at Stanford University in 1991. Based on intensive field research in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Peru and Venezuela, he has written three books and numerous journal articles on democracy, economic and social policy, populism, and diffusion processes in Latin America. Many of his articles and books have drawn on cognitive-psychological insights about bounded rationality to shed new light on puzzling political phenomena, such as the adoption of risky reforms in fragile democracies and the rash, ill-considered emulation of foreign precedents and models in a wide range of countries.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping:
US$ 33.07
From United Kingdom to U.S.A.
Shipping:
US$ 15.85
From United Kingdom to U.S.A.
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Condition: New. In. Seller Inventory # ria9781107044746_new
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # ABLIING23Mar2317530265236
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, United Kingdom
Hardback. Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 602. Seller Inventory # C9781107044746
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: Revaluation Books, Exeter, United Kingdom
Hardcover. Condition: Brand New. 318 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.00 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand. Seller Inventory # __110704474X
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Grand Eagle Retail, Fairfield, OH, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. This study investigates the three main waves of political regime contention in Europe and Latin America. Surprisingly, protest against authoritarian rule spread across countries more quickly in the nineteenth century, yet achieved greater success in bringing democracy in the twentieth. To explain these divergent trends, the book draws on cognitive-psychological insights about the inferential heuristics that people commonly apply; these shortcuts shape learning from foreign precedents such as an autocrat's overthrow elsewhere. But these shortcuts had different force, depending on the political-organizational context. In the inchoate societies of the nineteenth century, common people were easily swayed by these heuristics: jumping to the conclusion that they could replicate such a foreign precedent in their own countries, they precipitously challenged powerful rulers, yet often at inopportune moments - and with low success. By the twentieth century, however, political organizations had formed. As organizational ties loosened the bounds of rationality, contentious waves came to spread less rapidly, but with greater success. This wide-ranging study examines the three main waves of contention against autocratic rulers in Europe and Latin America: the revolutions of 1848, the protests stimulated by the Russian Revolution of 1917, and the efforts to unseat Latin America's military dictators in the 1970s and 1980s. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9781107044746
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: moluna, Greven, Germany
Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. This wide-ranging study examines the three main waves of contention against autocratic rulers in Europe and Latin America: the revolutions of 1848, the protests stimulated by the Russian Revolution of 1917, and the efforts to unseat Latin America s military. Seller Inventory # 477435670
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Buch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book examines three waves of contention in Europe and Latin America across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Seller Inventory # 9781107044746
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Revaluation Books, Exeter, United Kingdom
Hardcover. Condition: Brand New. 318 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.00 inches. In Stock. Seller Inventory # x-110704474X
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, United Kingdom
Hardcover. Condition: Like New. Like New. book. Seller Inventory # ERICA758110704474X6
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australia
Hardcover. Condition: new. Hardcover. This study investigates the three main waves of political regime contention in Europe and Latin America. Surprisingly, protest against authoritarian rule spread across countries more quickly in the nineteenth century, yet achieved greater success in bringing democracy in the twentieth. To explain these divergent trends, the book draws on cognitive-psychological insights about the inferential heuristics that people commonly apply; these shortcuts shape learning from foreign precedents such as an autocrat's overthrow elsewhere. But these shortcuts had different force, depending on the political-organizational context. In the inchoate societies of the nineteenth century, common people were easily swayed by these heuristics: jumping to the conclusion that they could replicate such a foreign precedent in their own countries, they precipitously challenged powerful rulers, yet often at inopportune moments - and with low success. By the twentieth century, however, political organizations had formed. As organizational ties loosened the bounds of rationality, contentious waves came to spread less rapidly, but with greater success. This wide-ranging study examines the three main waves of contention against autocratic rulers in Europe and Latin America: the revolutions of 1848, the protests stimulated by the Russian Revolution of 1917, and the efforts to unseat Latin America's military dictators in the 1970s and 1980s. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9781107044746
Quantity: 1 available