What moral standards ought nation-states abide by when selecting immigration policies? Peter Higgins argues that immigration policies can only be judged by considering the inequalities that are produced by the institutions – such as gender, race and class – that constitute our social world. He challenges conventional positions on immigration justice, including the view that states have a right to choose whatever immigration policies they like, or that all immigration restrictions ought to be eliminated and borders opened. Rather than suggesting one absolute solution, Higgins argues that a unique set of immigration policies will be just for each country. He concludes with concrete recommendations for policymaking.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Peter Higgins is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Department Member in Women’s and Gender Studies at Eastern Michigan University. His research applies a feminist perspective to issues of global justice.
Studies in Global Justice and Human Rights Series Editor: Thom Brooks This series publishes ground-breaking work on key topics in the area of global justice and human rights including democracy, gender, poverty, the environment, and just war. Books in the series are of broad interest to theorists working in politics, international relations, philosophy, and related disciplines. "Higgins urges us to consider an angle of vision on this issue that plays an important role in ordinary discussions but that has been unduly neglected in philosophical debates. The discussion is clear and lucid. This is an important contribution to contemporary debates about immigration admissions." Joseph H. Carens, University of Toronto The first book-length examination of immigrant admissions from a feminist philosophical perspective By what moral standards must nation-states select immigration policies? Immigration Justice is the first book-length feminist philosophical work addressed to this question, defending the view that the justice of an immigration policy can be ascertained only through consideration of the pervasive, systematic, and unjust inequalities engendered by the institutions, such as gender, race, and class, that constitute our social world. In this book, Peter Higgins challenges conventional positions taken on immigration justice, including the view that states have a moral right to choose whatever immigration policies they like, as well as the view that states morally ought to eliminate all or most restrictions on immigration - open borders. Key Features - Draws on empirical data relevant to the moral assessment of immigration policies - Presents the most thorough, up-to-date examination of existing philosophical work on justice in admissions, making it an ideal resource for courses on international justice - Argues that a unique set of immigration policies will be just for each country, depending on its economic and political position and on what social groups that state's policies are most likely to affect - Concludes with concrete recommendations for policymaking Peter W. Higgins is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Department Member in Women's and Gender Studies at Eastern Michigan University. Cover image: (c) Karl Dolenc/iStockphoto.com. Cover design: [EUP logo] www.euppublishing.com
Studies in Global Justice and Human Rights Series Editor: Thom Brooks This series publishes ground-breaking work on key topics in the area of global justice and human rights including democracy, gender, poverty, the environment, and just war. Books in the series are of broad interest to theorists working in politics, international relations, philosophy, and related disciplines. "Higgins urges us to consider an angle of vision on this issue that plays an important role in ordinary discussions but that has been unduly neglected in philosophical debates. The discussion is clear and lucid. This is an important contribution to contemporary debates about immigration admissions." Joseph H. Carens, University of Toronto The first book-length examination of immigrant admissions from a feminist philosophical perspective By what moral standards must nation-states select immigration policies? Immigration Justice is the first book-length feminist philosophical work addressed to this question, defending the view that the justice of an immigration policy can be ascertained only through consideration of the pervasive, systematic, and unjust inequalities engendered by the institutions, such as gender, race, and class, that constitute our social world. In this book, Peter Higgins challenges conventional positions taken on immigration justice, including the view that states have a moral right to choose whatever immigration policies they like, as well as the view that states morally ought to eliminate all or most restrictions on immigration - open borders. Key Features -Draws on empirical data relevant to the moral assessment of immigration policies -Presents the most thorough, up-to-date examination of existing philosophical work on justice in admissions, making it an ideal resource for courses on international justice -Argues that a unique set of immigration policies will be just for each country, depending on its economic and political position and on what social groups that state's policies are most likely to affect -Concludes with concrete recommendations for policymaking Peter W. Higgins is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Department Member in Women's and Gender Studies at Eastern Michigan University. Cover image: (c) Karl Dolenc/iStockphoto.com. Cover design: [EUP logo] www.euppublishing.com
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # GB-9781399565622
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. What moral standards ought nation-states abide by when selecting immigration policies? Peter Higgins argues that immigration policies can only be judged by considering the inequalities that are produced by the institutions such as gender, race and class that constitute our social world. He challenges conventional positions on immigration justice, including the view that states have a right to choose whatever immigration policies they like, or that all immigration restrictions ought to be eliminated and borders opened. Rather than suggesting one absolute solution, Higgins argues that a unique set of immigration policies will be just for each country. He concludes with concrete recommendations for policymaking. The first book-length examination of immigrant admissions from a feminist philosophical perspective. Higgins argues that a different set of immigration policies will be just for each country and concludes with concrete recommendations for policymaking. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Seller Inventory # 9781399565622
Seller: Rarewaves USA, OSWEGO, IL, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condition: New. New in Paperback. What moral standards ought nation-states abide by when selecting immigration policies? Peter Higgins argues that immigration policies can only be judged by considering the inequalities that are produced by the institutions - such as gender, race and class - that constitute our social world. He challenges conventional positions on immigration justice, including the view that states have a right to choose whatever immigration policies they like, or that all immigration restrictions ought to be eliminated and borders opened. Rather than suggesting one absolute solution, Higgins argues that a unique set of immigration policies will be just for each country. He concludes with concrete recommendations for policymaking. Seller Inventory # LU-9781399565622
Seller: Rarewaves.com USA, London, LONDO, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: New. New in Paperback. What moral standards ought nation-states abide by when selecting immigration policies? Peter Higgins argues that immigration policies can only be judged by considering the inequalities that are produced by the institutions - such as gender, race and class - that constitute our social world. He challenges conventional positions on immigration justice, including the view that states have a right to choose whatever immigration policies they like, or that all immigration restrictions ought to be eliminated and borders opened. Rather than suggesting one absolute solution, Higgins argues that a unique set of immigration policies will be just for each country. He concludes with concrete recommendations for policymaking. Seller Inventory # LU-9781399565622
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: Majestic Books, Hounslow, United Kingdom
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 408734763
Quantity: 3 available
Seller: Revaluation Books, Exeter, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: Brand New. new in paperback edition. 280 pages. 6.14x2.00x9.21 inches. In Stock. Seller Inventory # __1399565621
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: Chiron Media, Wallingford, United Kingdom
paperback. Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 6666-GRD-9781399565622
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: Chiron Media, Wallingford, United Kingdom
paperback. Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 6666-MAC-9781399565622
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: BargainBookStores, Grand Rapids, MI, U.S.A.
Paperback or Softback. Condition: New. Immigration Justice. Book. Seller Inventory # BBS-9781399565622
Seller: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, United Kingdom
Paperback / softback. Condition: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days. Seller Inventory # B9781399565622
Quantity: 10 available