In the context of microarray data, a common characteristic is that the number of parameter is greater than the number of samples (n≪p). Because of this feature, many existing methods, derived for the usual “small p and large n” problem, either cannot be applied or may not perform well. For the purpose of classification of tumor types in real and simulated microarray data using regularized and classification approaches, we have studied three regression methods, namely Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), ridge regression, elastic net and four classification methods namely KNN, SVM, RDA and DLDA. In order to evaluation, we have used four readily available real microarray data sets which are Colon, Brain, SRBCT and Spira. The lasso imposes an L1 penalty and ridge regression imposes an L2 penalty; whereas, the elastic net is a balance between these two. Real data and simulation study show that the elastic net outperforms the lasso, although they both are derived from similar concept. Through the comparative study we have found that RDA performs the best for Brain, SRBCT and Spira cancer data and KNN performs better for Colon cancer data.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Md. Muzammel Hosen has completed his B.sc(Hon’s) and M.S(Thesis) in Statistics from Shahjalal University of Science & Technology. In order to complete his M.S, he has accomplished his work under the supervision of Professor Dr. Mohammad Shahidul Islam. At present, he is trying to pursue a M.S degree in Statistics or Bioinformatics with scholarship.
"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping:
US$ 25.27
From Germany to U.S.A.
Seller: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -In the context of microarray data, a common characteristic is that the number of parameter is greater than the number of samples (n p). Because of this feature, many existing methods, derived for the usual 'small p and large n' problem, either cannot be applied or may not perform well. For the purpose of classification of tumor types in real and simulated microarray data using regularized and classification approaches, we have studied three regression methods, namely Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), ridge regression, elastic net and four classification methods namely KNN, SVM, RDA and DLDA. In order to evaluation, we have used four readily available real microarray data sets which are Colon, Brain, SRBCT and Spira. The lasso imposes an L1 penalty and ridge regression imposes an L2 penalty; whereas, the elastic net is a balance between these two. Real data and simulation study show that the elastic net outperforms the lasso, although they both are derived from similar concept. Through the comparative study we have found that RDA performs the best for Brain, SRBCT and Spira cancer data and KNN performs better for Colon cancer data. 112 pp. Englisch. Seller Inventory # 9783659556401
Quantity: 2 available
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - In the context of microarray data, a common characteristic is that the number of parameter is greater than the number of samples (n p). Because of this feature, many existing methods, derived for the usual 'small p and large n' problem, either cannot be applied or may not perform well. For the purpose of classification of tumor types in real and simulated microarray data using regularized and classification approaches, we have studied three regression methods, namely Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), ridge regression, elastic net and four classification methods namely KNN, SVM, RDA and DLDA. In order to evaluation, we have used four readily available real microarray data sets which are Colon, Brain, SRBCT and Spira. The lasso imposes an L1 penalty and ridge regression imposes an L2 penalty; whereas, the elastic net is a balance between these two. Real data and simulation study show that the elastic net outperforms the lasso, although they both are derived from similar concept. Through the comparative study we have found that RDA performs the best for Brain, SRBCT and Spira cancer data and KNN performs better for Colon cancer data. Seller Inventory # 9783659556401
Quantity: 1 available
Seller: moluna, Greven, Germany
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # 5164631
Quantity: Over 20 available