Items related to Haunted by Memory: Ghost Stories of the American Civil...

Haunted by Memory: Ghost Stories of the American Civil War (Voices of the Civil War) - Softcover

 
9798895270899: Haunted by Memory: Ghost Stories of the American Civil War (Voices of the Civil War)

Synopsis

As America’s bloodiest conflict, it is no surprise that the Civil War gave rise to a golden age of ghost stories. Popular publications were filled with accounts of ghosts―ghosts that appeared in the heat of battle, in the fretful quiet of picket duty, and in the miserable confines of hospitals and prisons. Civil War ghosts continued to haunt the troubled peace that followed, revealing that even so deadly a conflict left unresolved issues in its wake. In a nation forever altered by the war, these ghost stories speak to something far more meaningful than Americans’ taste for spine-tingling entertainment. They provide powerful evidence of how a wounded country tried to put the trauma, grief, and anxieties inflicted by the Civil War to rest. By telling ghost stories, Americans created narratives that honored the dead, explained the unexplainable, and gave their experiences a broader sense of identity and purpose.

In this annotated anthology of Civil War ghost stories, historians John R. Neff and Amy Laurel Fluker offer the first scholarly analysis of the significance of ghosts to the history and memory of the Civil War. Haunted by Memory includes hundreds of examples of ghostly tales that appeared in newspapers, periodicals, and books between 1861 and 1932. These tales both satisfied and fed popular demand for news, entertainment, and ghostlore, and became powerful tools of cultural memory. By bridging the study of the Civil War, folklore, and memory, this collection expands the parameters of cultural history and reveals how the supernatural became a lasting part of the commemorative landscape of the American Civil War.

"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.

About the Authors

Amy Laurel Fluker is an associate professor at Youngstown State University in Ohio, where she holds the Reeder Endowment in U.S. History. She is the author of Commonwealth of Copromise: Civil War Commemoration in Missouri, among other publications.



John R. Neff was an award-winning educator, associate professor of History, and director of the Center for Civil War Research at the University of Mississippi until his passing in 2020. He was the author of Honoring the Civil War Dead: Commemoration and the Problem of Reconciliation.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Ghosts are an intrinsic part of the human experience. Over the centuries and around the globe, they have stalked across stages, lurked throughout literature, and fueled campfire folktales. They have often appeared in times of anxiety, warned of impending doom, demanded vengeance against injustice, brought reassurances in the afterlife, and figured in significant theological and intellectual debates. They embody humanity’s deepest uncertainties, hopes, fears, and regrets. But they represent nothing so much as an intrusion of the past into the present. Ghosts are history made manifest. And there is no better way to convey the power of the past over the present than by telling a ghost story.

This makes ghost stories ideal vehicles for communicating historical memory. That is to say, they provide unique insight into understanding how people relate to history. When considered from that perspective, it matters not at all if ghosts are real. Sometimes, what is actually true about the past is less compelling than what people believe to be true about it and why. Generally, what is popularly believed about the past is far from a complete or accurate account. People interpret the past in a selective manner that affirms their values. They pick and choose the stories they deem worthy of remembrance. In this process, inevitably and often deliberately, alternative accounts of the past are forgotten, marginalized, or silenced.

These alternative accounts are not necessarily lost, however. Sometimes, ghost-like, they may be recalled to life by new scholarship. Or, be brought back to popular attention by efforts to interpret history in a more complete, accurate, and inclusive fashion. Either way, attempts to revise popularly-held memories about the past are not necessarily welcomed. They run the risk of being met with accusations of “revisionism” or even of “erasing” history.

Memory, then, is quite spectral. As with experiencing a haunting, it can be unsettling to be confronted by the past―particularly by past injustices―or to remember those darker aspects of history that are most often forgotten, marginalized, or silenced. Forcing the living to reckon with painful histories has traditionally been one of the most important objects of ghost stories. According to scholar Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, the appearance of a ghost “indicates that, beneath the surface of received history, there lurks another narrative, an untold story that calls into question the veracity of the authorized version of events.” Perhaps no one has elaborated on this function of ghosts more eloquently than historian Tiya Miles. “Ghosts are our guides to the troubled past, …” she writes, “whose stories compel us to remember whether or not we want to. … The past, they tell us, is a place rife with wrongs, with traumas that must be seen in order to be expelled and injustices that must be exposed in order to be redressed.”

"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.