Abstract Of The Arguments Of Rufus Choate And Charles Theodore Russell: For The Petitioners, On The Petitions Of David Pingree, And Over 3,000 Other Legal Voters (1846)

Abstract Of The Arguments Of Rufus Choate And Charles Theodore Russell: For The Petitioners, On The Petitions Of David Pingree, And Over 3,000 Other Legal Voters (1846) is a legal document that presents the arguments made by Rufus Choate and Charles Theodore Russell on behalf of the petitioners in the case of David Pingree and over 3,000 other legal voters. The case concerns the right to vote and the validity of certain election results. The book provides a detailed account of the legal arguments made by the two lawyers, including their interpretation of the law and their analysis of the facts of the case. It is a valuable resource for anyone interested in the history of American law and politics, and provides insight into the legal thinking of two prominent lawyers of the time.For A Railroad From Salem To Malden.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.

Rufus Choate (1799-1859) was a strong proponent of protective tariffs to assist domestic industry.