Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management (Environmental Ethics and Science Policy Series)

. Ed(s): Mayo, Deborah G.; Hollander, Rachelle D.

ISBN 10: 0195089294 / ISBN 13: 9780195089295

Published by Oxford University Press, 1994

About this Item

Discussions of science and values in risk management often focus on how values enter into arguments about risk. This volume concentrates instead on how values enter into the collection, interpretation, communication and evaluation of the acceptability of the evidence of risk. Editor(s): Mayo, Deborah G.; Hollander, Rachelle D. Series: Environmental Ethics & Science Policy. Num Pages: 304 pages, line figures. BIC Classification: KJG; KJMD; MBN; PDA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 235 x 156 x 23. Weight in Grams: 476. . 1994. Illustrated. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Seller Inventory # V9780195089295

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management (Environmental Ethics and Science Policy Series)
• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• Publication Date: 1994
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0195089294
• ISBN 13: 9780195089295
• Binding: Soft cover
• Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

Discussions of science and values in risk management have largely focused on how values enter into arguments about risks, that is, issues of acceptable risk. Instead this volume concentrates on how values enter into collecting, interpreting, communicating, and evaluating the evidence of risks, that is, issues of the acceptability of evidence of risk. By focusing on acceptable evidence, this volume avoids two barriers to progress. One barrier assumes that evidence of risk is largely a matter of objective scientific data and therefore uncontroversial. The other assumes that evidence of risk, being "just" a matter of values, is not amenable to reasoned critique. Denying both extremes, this volume argues for a more constructive conclusion: understanding the interrelations of scientific and value issues enables a critical scrutiny of risk assessments and better public deliberation about social choices. The contributors, distinguished philosophers, policy analysts, and natural and social scientists, analyze environmental and medical controversies, and assumptions underlying views about risk assessment and the scientific and statistical models used in risk management.

About the Author

Deborah G. Mayo is at Virginia Polytechnic Institute. Rachelle D. Hollander is at National Science Foundation.