Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument (Suny Series in Logic and Language)

Tindale, Christopher W. Christopher W. Tindale,

ISBN 10: 0791443884 / ISBN 13: 9780791443880

Published by State University of New York Press, 1999

About this Item

Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument (Suny Series in Logic and Language) This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping. .

Seller Inventory # 7719-9780791443880

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument (Suny Series in Logic and Language)
• Publisher: State University of New York Press
• Publication Date: 1999
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0791443884
• ISBN 13: 9780791443880
• Binding: paperback
• Condition: Very Good

About this title

Synopsis

Approaches recent innovations in argumentation theory from a primarily rhetorical perspective.

The revival of argumentation theory in the past few decades has focused on its logical and dialectical dimensions, with less attention paid to rhetorical features. This book explores and then redresses this imbalance. Tindale examines important logical and dialectical innovations in recent argumentation theory and shows that they depend implicitly upon rhetorical features of argument that have been suppressed in the account. This is illustrated using two extended case studies, one looking at Shell International's defense of its actions in Nigeria after the death of Ken Saro-Wiwa, and the other exploring the uses of character-based argument and testimony in a Holocaust-denial text and legal trial.

In addition to the case studies, two chapters treat serious problems that plague current argumentation theory. The first concerns the nature of fallacy; the second concerns the ties between traditional argumentation and a model of rationality that has been seriously critiqued by feminist and postmodernist scholars. In both instances, the discussion indicates how a rhetorical approach to argumentation offers fresh insights and suggests responses to the questions raised.

About the Author

Christopher W. Tindale is Professor of Philosophy at Trent University. He is the coauthor of Good Reasoning Matters: A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking and is coeditor of Argumentation and Rhetoric.