Affirmative Action and Racial Preference: A Debate (Point/Counterpoint)
Language: English
Published by Oxford University Press, 2003
- Softcover
- Used

Seller: -OnTimeBooks-, Phoenix, AZ, U.S.A.-OnTimeBooks-
AbeBooks seller since March 9, 2023
Condition: Used - Good
US$ 6.99
Quantity: 2 available
Add to basketItem description from seller
A copy that has been read, remains in good condition. All pages are intact, and the cover is intact. The spine and cover show signs of wear. Pages can include notes and highlighting and show signs of wear, and the copy can include "From the library of" labels or previous owner inscriptions. 100% GUARANTEE! Shipped with delivery confirmation, if you're not satisfied with purchase please return item! Ships via media mail.
Seller Inventory # OTV.0195148959.G
- Title
- Affirmative Action and Racial Preference: A Debate (Point/Counterpoint)
- Author
- Cohen, Carl; Sterba, James P.
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Publication year
- 2003
- Condition
- good
- Binding
- Soft cover
- Language
- English
- ISBN 10
- 0195148959
- ISBN 13
- 9780195148954
Carl Cohen, a key figure in the University of Michigan Supreme Court cases, argues that racial preferences are morally wrong--forbidden by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, and explicitly banned by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He also contends that such preferences harm society in general, damage the universities that use them, and undermine the minorities they were intended to serve. James P. Sterba counters that, far from being banned by the Constitution and the civil rights acts, affirmative action is actually mandated by law in the pursuit of a society that is racially and sexually just. The same Congress that adopted the 14th Amendment, he notes, passed race-specific laws that extended aid to blacks. Indeed, there are various kinds of affirmative action--compensation for past discrimination, remedial measures aimed at current discrimination, the guarantee of diversity--and Sterba reviews the Supreme Court cases that build a constitutional foundation for each. Affirmative action, he argues, favors qualified minority candidates, not unqualified ones. Both authors offer concluding comment on the University of Michigan cases decided in 2003.
Half a century after Brown v. Board of Education, issues pertaining to racial discrimination continue to grip American society. Ideal for courses in political, social, ethical, and legal philosophy, this penetrating debate explores the philosophical and legal arguments on all sides of affirmative action, but also reveals the passions that drive the issue to the forefront of public life.
"Synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
About the Author
"About the title" may belong to another edition of this title.
-OnTimeBooks-
Phoenix, AZ, U.S.A.
AbeBooks seller since March 9, 2023
Shipping rates within U.S.A.
| Item | 3 to 8 business days | 2 to 6 business days |
|---|---|---|
| First item | US$ 0.00 | US$ 3.99 |
Payment methods
Specialty
Used books of all typesSeller's business information
BookDrop LLC
601 S 54th Ave, STE 101
Phoenix, AZ U.S.A. 85043