The Anthropological Circle: Symbol, Function, History (Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology, Series Number 37)

Augé, Marc

ISBN 10: 0521232368 / ISBN 13: 9780521232364

Published by Cambridge University Press, 1982

About this Item

Very good hardcover. No dust jacket. The text is clean and unmarked. Covers show minor shelf wear with some light fading. Bindings tight, hinges strong.; 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed! Ships same or next business day!

Seller Inventory # 112407250016

Bibliographic Details

• Title: The Anthropological Circle: Symbol, Function, History (Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology, Series Number 37)
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Publication Date: 1982
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0521232368
• ISBN 13: 9780521232364
• Binding: Hardcover
• Condition: Very Good
• Weight: 13 ounces

About this title

Synopsis

Anthropology is both outside of history and within it. Histories of anthropology tend to summarise particular authors' intellectual differences; but, as Marc Augé argues in this book, first published in English in 1982, these differences may in fact be intrinsically derived from intellectual divisions within anthropology as obvious as they are irreconcilable. Augé identifies, in contemporary debates in French anthropology, the paths that perhaps allow us to transcend these oppositions. On doing so, he explores and clarifies the relationship that anthropology enjoys with history, on the intellectual plane, and with politics, on the historical plane. His argument is stimulating and challenging, and will interest all social anthropologists and sociologists concerned with the theoretical foundations of their disciplines, as well as demonstrating to historians and political scientists what anthropology has to offer them.

Book Description

Anthropology is both outside of history and within it. Histories of anthropology tend to summarise particular authors' intellectual differences; but, as Marc Augé argues in this book, first published in English in 1982, these differences may be intrinsically derived from intellectual divisions within anthropology as obvious as they are irreconcilable.