Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric of Assent

. Ed(s): Williams, David Cratis; Hazen, Michael David

ISBN 10: 0817353356 / ISBN 13: 9780817353353

Published by The University of Alabama Press, 2006

About this Item

Contemporary essays address the central problem of power in assent rhetoric. Editor(s): Williams, David Cratis; Hazen, Michael David. Num Pages: 240 pages. BIC Classification: CFG; JPA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 229 x 152 x 18. Weight in Grams: 386. . 2006. New edition. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Seller Inventory # V9780817353353

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric of Assent
• Publisher: The University of Alabama Press
• Publication Date: 2006
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0817353356
• ISBN 13: 9780817353353
• Binding: Soft cover
• Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

A collection of eleven essays presented at the 1982 Biennial Wake Forest University Argumentation Conference, held with the goal of establishing a recurring informal, small colloquium on argumentation theory at which both established and aspiring scholars in the area can present ideas to their colleagues with the prospect of the sort of intensive give-and-take critiques rare in larger conferences. This volume contains select essays that grew out of that interchange.

The eleven essays coalesce around the general question of "When, if ever, is assent justified?" And, as Professor Cox astutely notes in his introduction, such a question immediately leads into considerations of argument and power. In these considerations, many differing perspectives are represented in this volume: aesthetic and symbolist approaches, rationalistic and formalistic approaches, field theory perspectives, orientations toward various conceptualizations of a public sphere, etc.

Argumentation Theory and the Rhetoric of Assent is intended not as a primer on argument theory but rather as a look at American approaches to a philosophy of argumentation and argument criticism. As such, the essays probe the implications of both current practices and theoretical approaches: the objective is not to map the terrain argumentation theory has traversed in recent years but rather to plot a route for the direction in which argumentation studies should move. The concluding essays by James Arnt Aune and G. Thomas Goodnight confront these concerns explicitly.

About the Author

David Cratis Williams is assistant professor of Speech Communication at the University of Missouri, Rolla.

Michael David Hazen is professor of Speech Communication at Wake Forest University.