Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory

Earman, John

ISBN 10: 0262050463 / ISBN 13: 9780262050463

Published by Bradford Books, 1992

About this Item

Connecting readers with great books since 1972. Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have condition issues including wear and notes/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority!

Seller Inventory # S_444528909

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory
• Publisher: Bradford Books
• Publication Date: 1992
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0262050463
• ISBN 13: 9780262050463
• Binding: hardcover
• Condition: Acceptable

About this title

Synopsis

There is currently no viable alternative to the Bayesian analysis of scientific inference, yet the available versions of Bayesianism fail to do justice to several aspects of the testing and confirmation of scientific hypotheses. Bayes or Bust? provides the first balanced treatment of the complex set of issues involved in this nagging conundrum in the philosophy of science. Both Bayesians and anti-Bayesians will find a wealth of new insights on topics ranging from Bayes's original paper to contemporary formal learning theory.

In a paper published posthumously in 1763, the Reverend Thomas Bayes made a seminal contribution to the understanding of "analogical or inductive reasoning." Building on his insights, modem Bayesians have developed an account of scientific inference that has attracted numerous champions as well as numerous detractors. Earman argues that Bayesianism provides the best hope for a comprehensive and unified account of scientific inference, yet the presently available versions of Bayesianisin fail to do justice to several aspects of the testing and confirming of scientific theories and hypotheses. By focusing on the need for a resolution to this impasse, Earman sharpens the issues on which a resolution turns. John Earman is Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh.

About the Author

John Earman is Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh.