Chasing Bandits (Paperback)

Michael E. Neagle

ISBN 10: 1469691043 / ISBN 13: 9781469691046

Published by The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 2025

About this Item

Paperback. While the war on terror has been America's largest and most publicized attempt to root out foreign enemies this century, the quest to identify and destroy real or imagined threats to national security has long been a part of US history. Indeed, since the onset of the United States' overseas empire at the dawn of the twentieth century, it has pursued enemies in places of strategic interest around the globe: the remote islands of the Philippines, the US southern border, hemispheric hot spots in Central and South America, and the greater Middle East.The common depiction of these kinds of foesprivate actors who did not formally represent the countries they fought forhas maintained a remarkable consistency over time. The only difference is that enemies who used to be called "bandits" then are now more often referred to as "terrorists." Connoting an illegitimacy of both cause and means, the widespread use of such terms also has served to blunt deeper considerations of US foreign engagements. Drawing on six case studies, Michael E. Neagle spotlights the commonalities of how the United States has leveraged popular understandings of "bandits" to justify incursions abroad as well as rally popular and political support at home. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Seller Inventory # 9781469691046

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Chasing Bandits (Paperback)
• Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
• Publication Date: 2025
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 1469691043
• ISBN 13: 9781469691046
• Binding: Paperback
• Condition: new

About this title

Synopsis

While the war on terror has been America’s largest and most publicized attempt to root out foreign enemies this century, the quest to identify and destroy real or imagined threats to national security has long been a part of US history. Indeed, since the onset of the United States' overseas empire at the dawn of the twentieth century, it has pursued enemies in places of strategic interest around the globe: the remote islands of the Philippines, the US southern border, hemispheric hot spots in Central and South America, and the greater Middle East.

The common depiction of these kinds of foes—private actors who did not formally represent the countries they fought for—has maintained a remarkable consistency over time. The only difference is that enemies who used to be called “bandits” then are now more often referred to as “terrorists.” The widespread use of such terms, which connote an illegitimacy of both cause and means, also has served to blunt deeper considerations of US foreign engagements. Drawing on six case studies, Michael E. Neagle spotlights the commonalities of how the United States has leveraged popular understandings of “bandits” to justify incursions abroad as well as rally popular and political support at home.

About the Author

Michael E. Neagle is professor of history at Nichols College.