This research compares XML and ASCII based event logging systems in terms of their storage and processing efficiency. XML has been an emerging technology, even for security. Therefore, it is researched as a logging system with the mitigation of its verbosity. Each system consists of source content, the network transmission, database storage, and querying which are all studied as individual parts. The ASCII logging system consists of the text file as source, FTP as transport, and a relational database system for storage and querying. The XML system has the XML files and XML files in binary form using Efficient XML Interchange encoding, FTP as transport using both XML and binary XML, and an XML database for storage and querying. Further comparisons are made between the XML itself and binary XML, as well as binary XML to ASCII text when comparing file sizes and transmission efficiency. XML itself is a poor choice for hard drive and network transport time compared to ASCII. However, in a binary form, it uses less hard drive space and network resources. Because no XML databases support a binary XML, it is loaded without any optimization. The ASCII loads into the relational database with less time than XML into its database. However, querying each database, neither outperforms the other as one query results in shorter time for one, and another query results in a shorter time for the other. Therefore, XML and/or its binary form, is a viable candidate for use as a comprehensive logging system.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
