Comparative CFD Study on Different Under Water Vehicles for Best L/D | 2D Hydrodynamic Analysis on the Outer Shell of Four Different Under Water Vehicles for Best Aerodynamic Characterstics

Umair Mughal (u. a.)

ISBN 10: 3838361350 / ISBN 13: 9783838361352

Published by LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2010

About this Item

Comparative CFD Study on Different Under Water Vehicles for Best L/D | 2D Hydrodynamic Analysis on the Outer Shell of Four Different Under Water Vehicles for Best Aerodynamic Characterstics | Umair Mughal (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | 88 S. | Englisch | 2010 | LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing | EAN 9783838361352 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

Seller Inventory # 101096688

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Comparative CFD Study on Different Under Water Vehicles for Best L/D | 2D Hydrodynamic Analysis on the Outer Shell of Four Different Under Water Vehicles for Best Aerodynamic Characterstics
• Publisher: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing
• Publication Date: 2010
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 3838361350
• ISBN 13: 9783838361352
• Binding: Taschenbuch
• Condition: Neu
• Dimensions: 220W x 150H x 6D millimeters 220 millimeters width by 150 millimeters height by 6 millimeters depth
• Weight: 149 grams
• Seller catalogs:
  • Bücher

About this title

Synopsis

Hydrodynamic analysis of under water platforms is gaining a lot of attention , Computational Fluid Dynamics has revolutionized the field of fluid dynamics in terms of number of solutions available for computation of complex fluid flows associated with real world problems. This book aims at comparing the hydrodynamic flow around four different designs. The first design shape is fully elliptical where the other three have different nose, body and tail profiles. Pressure contours were developed at different angle of attack and from these contours lift forces and moments were found. After doing analysis the results on these shells were compared. On the basis of Co-efficient of Lift to Co-efficient of Drag Ratio versus angle of attack and Co-efficient of Moment versus angle of attack, the best profile is proposed. Meshing is done in GAMBIT 3.2 the results are analyzed in FLUENT 6.2. On the basis of these comparisons best shell is proposed.