Correspondence between Governance and Public Policy Networks | Examples of municipalities in the interior of São Paulo.

Anne Carolina Tonon Seneme Casarin

ISBN 10: 6200044279 / ISBN 13: 9786200044273

Published by Editorial Académica Española, 2019

About this Item

Correspondence between Governance and Public Policy Networks | Examples of municipalities in the interior of São Paulo. | Anne Carolina Tonon Seneme Casarin | Taschenbuch | Portugiesisch | 2019 | Editorial Académica Española | EAN 9786200044273 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Editorial Academica Espanola, Brivibas Gatve 197, 1039 RIGA, LETTLAND, customerservice[at]vdm-vsg[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

Seller Inventory # 117394546

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Correspondence between Governance and Public Policy Networks | Examples of municipalities in the interior of São Paulo.
• Publisher: Editorial Académica Española
• Publication Date: 2019
• Language: Portuguese
• ISBN 10: 6200044279
• ISBN 13: 9786200044273
• Binding: Taschenbuch
• Condition: Neu
• Dimensions: 220W x 150H x 8D millimeters 220 millimeters width by 150 millimeters height by 8 millimeters depth
• Weight: 215 grams
• Seller catalogs:
  • Bücher

About this title

Synopsis

The paper analyzes the characteristics of governance in different public policy networks. Governance is one of the constituent elements of networks and we can defined in two main lines: (a) as a control mechanism; (b) as a group cohesion mechanism. The guiding proposition is that, for different networks, different manifestations of governance correspond in their expressions of control and cohesion. As a theoretical basis, the statements of the social approach of networks, relational governance and policy networks are used. The research question is: Are there specific governance characteristics in different public policy networks? The answer found is that there are signs of a correspondence between the nature of governance mechanisms and the specificity of networks, especially in the case of care networks, although in each network there are variations in favor and against the proposition. The article bring a theoretical benefit on the interface between governance and networks process, and a methodological benefit offering a framework of qualitative and operational indicators.