Shakespeare as a foil for critical taste across centuries. This volume surveys how critics from the 17th to 19th centuries reinterpreted, revised, and debated the genius of Shakspere, revealing how debates about unity, imitation, and moral purpose shaped the public image of his work.
From Rymer to Pope, from Lessing to Wendell, the book explains how writers and editors altered plays, reworked scenes, and disputed what Shakespeare really achieved. It traces a long arc from harsh critique to a modern, expansive appreciation, showing how the very idea of authorship and originality evolved through relentless debate.
- How critics characterized Shakespeare’s innovations and perceived flaws.
- How later editors altered works to fit changing tastes and theatre practices.
- How scholars argued about influence, imitation, and the sources behind famous plays.
- How the perception of Shakespeare shifted toward a lasting, monumental stature.
Ideal for readers of literary history, Shakespeare studies, and anyone curious about how critics shape a literary icon over time.