Some Defects in Our Criminal Code and How to Remedy Them (Classic Reprint)

Defects in the Missouri Criminal Code examined and argued for reform

This clear, practical talk surveys longstanding flaws in Missouri’s criminal procedure. It argues that indictments are needlessly lengthy and pervaded by unnecessary formalities, and that essential issues like proof, arraignment, and grand jury practices should be streamlined for fairness and clarity. The speaker cautions against abuse of continuances and venue changes, urging timely trials and honest, straightforward procedures. The piece also questions juror qualifications that keep capable citizens from service, and calls for reforms so ordinary readers can understand verdicts and how charges are proven. With wit and firsthand courtroom experience, it challenges tradition while upholding the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial. The aim is to remove needless technical barriers without compromising justice, and to make the law more accessible to defendants and the public alike. This edition presents the core argument, the underlying concerns, and practical recommendations for a more rational criminal code.

Ideal for readers of legal history, policymakers, and law students seeking a concise view of early 20th‑century critique of state criminal procedure.

• Why overly long indictments can confuse rather than inform defendants.
• Arguments for simpler, clearer charges and proof requirements.
• Critique of continuances, venue changes, and jury selection rules.
• Proposals to improve fairness while preserving the presumption of innocence.

A thoughtful resource for anyone studying the evolution of criminal law and courtroom practice.