Delayed Democracy
Language: English
Published by AuthorHouse, 2013
- Softcover
- New

Seller: moluna, Greven, Germanymoluna
AbeBooks seller since July 9, 2020
Condition: New
US$ 33.50
Quantity: Over 20 available
Add to basketItem description from seller
Seller Inventory # 447945403
- Title
- Delayed Democracy
- Author
- Jallow, Alagi
- Publisher
- AuthorHouse
- Publication year
- 2013
- Condition
- New
- Binding
- Soft cover
- Language
- English
- ISBN 10
- 1491806621
- ISBN 13
- 9781491806623
"Synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
DELAYED DEMOCRACY: HOW PRESS FREEDOM COLLAPSED IN THE GAMBIA
A Proposition for Research in The Gambian Journalism History 1965-2013
By Alagi Yorro JallowAuthorHouse
All rights reserved.
Contents
| Dedication................................................................. | vii |
| Acknowledgments............................................................ | ix |
| Abstract................................................................... | xi |
| Preface.................................................................... | xv |
| Foreword................................................................... | xix |
| Introduction............................................................... | 1 |
| Brief History of The Gambia................................................ | 5 |
| A Sketch of Politics in The Gambia......................................... | 8 |
| The Fourth Estate.......................................................... | 10 |
| The Role of Journalists.................................................... | 12 |
| The Concept of Press Freedom............................................... | 13 |
| Overview of the African Press.............................................. | 17 |
| Early Development of the Press in The Gambia............................... | 20 |
| Pre-Independence Newspapers: 1883-1965..................................... | 21 |
| The Various Pre-Independence Newspapers.................................... | 22 |
| Other Publications......................................................... | 26 |
| Circulation Information.................................................... | 26 |
| Post-Independence Newspapers: 1965-2013.................................... | 26 |
| Policies Governing the Establishment of Newspapers in The Gambia........... | 27 |
| Broadcasting in The Gambia................................................. | 29 |
| Radio Broadcasting in The Gambia........................................... | 29 |
| Telegraph Station Act, 1913................................................ | 31 |
| Brief Overview of Current Media Outlets.................................... | 33 |
| The Gambian Constitutions and Press Freedom................................ | 34 |
| National Media Commission Act.............................................. | 42 |
| Lawsuit against the National Media Commission Act.......................... | 44 |
| Defendants' Response....................................................... | 50 |
| Initial Supreme Court's Rulings............................................ | 55 |
| Reaction to the Supreme Court's Rulings.................................... | 57 |
| Additional Acts Suppressing the Media...................................... | 58 |
| The Press under the "Civilian Government": 1997-2013....................... | 60 |
| Further Actions against Members of the Press............................... | 67 |
| Libel...................................................................... | 67 |
| Sedition................................................................... | 68 |
| Censorship................................................................. | 68 |
| The Impact of Press Freedom on Processes of Democratization................ | 70 |
| Theoretical Framework of Limits on Press Freedom........................... | 71 |
| Techniques of Suppression: Subverting Freedom of Expression................ | 72 |
| Theoretical Framework on Press Freedom and Government Relations............ | 73 |
| Hegemony as a Model of the Press-Government Relationship................... | 75 |
| Hegemonic Elements in Yahya Jammeh......................................... | 77 |
| E-Democracy: Using Information and Communication Technologies in the Democratic ProcessS........................................................ | 86 |
| The Status of Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) in The Gambia Today............................................................... | 87 |
| Suggested Objectives of the Media.......................................... | 89 |
| General Objectives......................................................... | 89 |
| Specific Objectives........................................................ | 90 |
| Challenges in the Media Sector............................................. | 91 |
| Recommended Reform to Media in The Gambia.................................. | 91 |
| The Internet and Political Repression...................................... | 93 |
| Conclusion................................................................. | 96 |
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
There is a rapidly growing literature on democratization in Africa,but very little of this literature deals with the important role thatcommunications, or the media, play. However, Nyamnjoh (2005) hasraised the level of the debate on the media and the democratizationagenda in Africa to a very high level with perceptive and insightfulanalysis of the problematic. In his groundbreaking study of the Africanmedia, Nyamnjoh explores the role of the mass media in promotingdemocracy and empowering civil society in Africa. He contextualizesAfrica within the rapidly changing global media and shows how patternsof media ownership and state control have evolved, as well as the hugedifficulties under which most African media workers labor.
Since Africa's mid-century emergence from colonial rule, the search forstable democratic institutions has gone on too often in "fits and starts," asAdeyinka (1995) noted. And nowhere has the struggle been more evidentthan within the African press. Democratic press values and practices havebeen habits sorely lacking throughout much of modern Africa.
As Tettey rightly observes:
A major fillip to the process of democratization andcitizen engagement in Africa has been the changesin media ownership and pluralism over the last twodecades or so. There is no question about the fact thatthe media landscape in Africa over this period has shownsignificant shifts, with tremendous expansion in thenumber of media outlets as democratic transformationsmake inroads into what used to be largely dictatorialpolitical environments. Even countries with regimes thatare not receptive to democratic ideals have not escapedthese developments and have seen spaces open formediated politics. (Tettey 2008)
It is no secret that governments everywhere are not enamored of coveragethat will put them in a bad light. However, an informed and engagedcitizenry is not cultivated by foisting on them only the politicallypalatable. The media in various African countries have demonstratedthat they are willing to defy the wrath of their governments to bringinformation to the public that will enable them to accurately assess theirpolitical leaders and hold them accountable (Tettey 2008).
It is a general belief that only one African nation delivered anythingof value to its citizens within the first fifteen years of independence—Botswana—whereasin other countries, the only winners were thepresident and his cronies (Karikari 2004).
In the case of The Gambia, perhaps, to borrow from Chinua Achebe, itcan best be summed up this way: "We had been in the rain together untilyesterday. Then a handful of us—the smart, and the lucky—hardly everhad to scramble for the one shelter our former rulers left, and had takenit over and barricaded themselves in" (Achebe, 1966). This was as trueof the Jawara regime of 1965 as it is of the Jammeh regime of 1994, andit is even more so today. The Gambia was certainly groping in the darkafter almost three decades of so-called independence. The instrumentsof power were hijacked by the People's Progressive Party (PPP), andthe process of democratization halted in mid-progress, largely becausecivil society was severely weakened. There was no incentive to organize,because there were no publicly expressed issues to organize around—thenewsmakers were mute largely due to the fact that there was no outletto issue opinion, and there was a weak alternative to act as a sponsor forideas from competing stakeholders. And a systematic entrenchment of aone-party state, unquestioned, emerged.
It seemed that panoply of the most crucial aspects of democracy wasinstituted over time. The systems that were needed to check againstcorruption, impunity, and abuse of the national interest and assets haderoded away, because those that should have been empowered to checkthem were disenfranchised by a system that had grown too powerfulto be dismantled. The crony system of the state was too massive, toointimidating, and too powerful, whereas the primary blueprint for goodgovernance, like the constitution, although still in place, was dormant.The protectors of the most sacred document (the Constitution) of theFirst Republic, the legislature, were transfixed by power. Therefore, withthe fixation of control over every aspect of governance, the private media,which were the only institution that could not be directly manipulated bythe political elite, were simply pushed aside. In a state where the rulingparty also controlled the majority of the seats in the House of Parliamentthat made laws, appointed the judiciary, and approved budgets, therewas only one way the nation would head—one direction—chosen by thepresident Yahya Jammeh, and it was not necessarily the best course.
The picture is completely blurred when trying to critically analyze atrack record of freedom of the press and good governance from 1965 to1994—and this has been the case even until now, especially when theissue of the fourth estate is scrutinized. As evidence shows, the media hadalways remained a tool for either propaganda by the government or as anenemy of the government. It has never been viewed as an unbiased assetin the issue of governance or nation building. During all the years of theFirst Republic, the People's Progressive Party's government suspectedthe private media of working against them. The private media detestedthis attitude and, in turn, focused most of their energies in simplystaying alive and active by the only way they knew how: by pesteringthe government for information, by constantly gnawing at its heels,and forcing it to be on the defensive. This tactic, while effective in theshort run, becomes untenable in the long run, as the government simplyclamors inward and never deals with the private media, causing them torely on rumors, or possibly unreliable sources.
Everywhere in Africa, radio is the popular medium, but rarely is radiofree of government ownership or constraint. The print press serves amuch smaller audience, and in many sub-Saharan countries, television iseven more limited, viewed only by a tiny minority of affluent householdswho prefer satellite programming from Europe and North Americarather than bother with the slender fare of local channels (Karikari,2004). Economic backwardness is only partly to blame for journalisticunderdevelopment; much deeper—and more troubling—has been along-standing belief among many African governments that the pressshould be handmaiden of the state and the development process. In thepast few years, with a fresh, continent-wide sweep of democratization, asmall but authentically free press has begun to emerge in most Africancountries—albeit with governments anxiously looking on, deeply mixedin their views and their degree of tolerance for dissent. Journalists, notsurprisingly, hold radically divergent views of their responsibilities androles.
At the time of writing, The Gambia has nine newspapers, eighteenradio stations, and one television station. Yet, The Gambia—despiteoutward signs of what once seemed to promise a modern and vibrantpress-government relationship—is hobbled today by what is in reality amuch bleaker system.
Adapting Italian social theorist Antonio Grimace's concept of hegemony,this book traces the oscillation between subtle and overt forms ofcoercion, cooptation, seduction, and outright domination used by aseries of military and civilian machinations meant to bend the press totheir wills. The media landscape in The Gambia changed drastically afterthe military overthrew democratically elected government in July 1994.Although military rulers were quick to label themselves as "soldiers witha difference" and urged the public to criticize them wherever they wentwrong, they were equally swift in revealing their true colors. Within ashort while, the Armed Forces Provisional Ruling Council (AFPRC)pounced on the media.
The AFPRC regime metamorphosed into a civilian regime andrechristened itself the Alliance for Patriotic Reorientation andConstruction (APRC). Despite its promises to uphold and safeguard thedemocratic principles embedded in the country, it instead eroded andflouted every aspect of those principles. Journalists became the regime'sgreatest victim, despite the fact that the regime had established the firsttelevision station in the country, as well as given operational licenses toa number of media outlets. The head of the military junta, ChairmanYahya Jammeh, was quick to label journalists the "unworthy sons ofAfrica" and called on people not to buy newspapers in order to put themout of business.
Economically, The Gambia is very weak, with the majority of thepopulation living on less than a dollar a day. The country depends ontourism as its major income earner, particularly as drought has causedgroundnut and cotton export to decline over the years. The nationalcurrency, the dalasi, has seriously depreciated against major internationalforeign currencies, causing a negative impact on the media and otherinstitutions. Although the business sector has seen a tremendous boom inthe last few years, with significant investment coming into the country,this has created very little impact on the media, even in advertising. Mostbusinesses in The Gambia are not keen on advertising with the privatemedia for fear of reprisal from the government. Those who have daredto test the waters have been labeled "opposition sympathizers." Similarly,no government agency places standard advertisements in the privatepress. These same agencies, however, are quick to fill the pages of privatemedia with propaganda and congratulatory messages for the presidentYahya Jammeh on special occasions such as his birthday and the day hecame to power, thereby adding a negative political dimension to someadvertising.
BRIEF HISTORY OF THE GAMBIA
The Gambia is said to have been Britain's first colony in West Africa(Southorn, 13). It was also the last of the four former British colonies inWest Africa to be granted independence.
The pre-colonial history of the area around the banks of the GambiaRiver dates back several centuries. The Carthaginian explorer, Hanno,had referred to The Gambia in his writing about his voyage in WestAfrica in 470 B.C. (The Gambia, the Land and the People, NouvellesEditions Africaines, 9).
From the fifth to the eighth century A.D., most of the Senegambianarea was part of the Ghana Empire. Then came the invasion by theAlmoravides, the Muslim Berbers from North Africa who brought Islamto West Africa.
From the thirteenth to the sixteenth century, the area was under thecontrol of the Mali Empire. The Gambia was then inhabited by Wollofson the north bank of the river and the Jolas on the south bank. Whenthe Mali Empire collapsed, the Mandingo and Susu leaders who ruledthe empire returned to Futa Jallon and continued to exercise influenceover parts of The Gambia, and what is now the Cassamance region ofSenegal until the early eighteenth century.
The area was then invaded by Fula warriors, which resulted in theSoinke-Marabout (pagan-Muslim) wars of the eighteenth and nineteenthcentury. The Gambia's first significant contact with Europeans datesback to the fifteenth century. The Portuguese were probably the firstexplorers to enter the River Gambia with the mission in 1455 of Luizde Cadamosto (Gray 1966, 5). The Spanish followed in 1475 and theEnglish in 1588. This period saw intense rivalry between Europeanexplorers with the Dutch, French, and the Courlanders (Germans), allsending missions to The Gambia because the area was believed to be veryrich in gold and other precious minerals.
The Portuguese presence in The Gambia lasted more than 130 years, andduring this period they introduced groundnuts (now the country's maincash crop), orange, lime, and pawpaw from Brazil (ibid, 15).
The end of the Portuguese influence in The Gambia was marked byintense activity and bids for control of an island thirty-two kilometersup the river that the Portuguese had named Saint Andrew's Island. TheCourlanders built a fort on the island in 1651, but it was captured by theFrench in 1659. The Courlanders reclaimed it the following year only tolose it to an English naval force the year after. The English renamed theisland Fort James.
But although the British capture of James Island gave them a strategicposition from which to monitor traffic on the river, and they did nothave total control over the surrounding area. On the north bank of theriver, directly opposite the island, the settlement of Albreda was leased tothe French in 1681 by the king of Niumi.
From 1689 to 1702, the French and British tried to dislodge one anotherfrom the two settlements, but the French remained at Albreda until1857, well after the Treaty of Versailles in 1783 confirmed British ruleover The Gambia (Palmer 1988, 123-125).
In 1763, the Treaty of Paris, which ended the Seven Year War, gaveSenegal (except the island of Goree) to Britain. For a period of fifty-oneyears (1763-1814), The Gambia was ruled as part of the British colonyof Senegambia, with the governor based at Saint Louis in Senegal, andthe lieutenant-governor for The Gambia based at James Island (Gray1966, 125).
James Island played two major contrasting roles in the slave trade. Itserved as a major loading point from the time the first slave ship left TheGambia in 1510 until the trade was abolished by the British in 1807.After the abolition, the island served as a strategic point from which tostop slave ships.
It was from this point that Kunta Kinteh, the great-grandfather of AlexHailey, author of the bestseller Roots, was believed to have been shippedto the United States as a slave. Kunta Kinteh was reportedly capturedoutside his village of Juffure, which is a kilometer away from the banksof the river and the settlement of Albreda.
In 1816, the British, wishing to exercise tighter control over the riverin order to enforce the ban on the slave trade, leased from the king ofKombo the uninhabited island at the mouth of the river (Gray 1966,127-128).
The island known locally as Banjul (the Mandika word for "bamboofiber") was renamed Saint Mary's Island, and the settlement establishedthere later was called Bathurst. Bathurst soon replaced James Island asthe major British settlement and became the territory's capital uponindependence in 1965. In 1973, the city reverted to its original Gambianname, Banjul.
Even at the time that the British leased the Island of Saint Mary in 1816,they were not particularly interested in maintaining The Gambia as acolony. Their main interest was the river, and when they abolished theslave trade in 1807, the colony was handed over to the governor of SierraLeone. The British were undecided on what status they should give theterritory. One moment it was ruled from Sierra Leone, the next it wasmade a crown colony only to be relegated a few years later to the statusof a settlement.
However, in 1888, the territory was finally separated from Sierra Leone(Hughes 1988, 480). The Gambian Island of Saint Mary and Island ofGeorgetown, which is further up the river, became a crown colony with alegislative council, while the rest of the territory became a protectorate.
Though The Gambia was the oldest British West African colony, it wasthe last one to seek and obtain independence, which it finally did in1965.
A SKETCH OF POLITICS IN THE GAMBIA
For more than a quarter of a century, The Gambia was one ofSub-Saharan Africa's longest-standing multiparty democracies. It wasperceived (along with Botswana and Mauritius) as an "exception" onthe African continent, where authoritarianism and military regimes arethe norm (Africa Development, 2000). Apart from the aborted coupof 1981, The Gambia had enjoyed relative peace and stability since itattained independence from Britain in 1965. In 1994, The Gambia wasperceived again as a deviant case when a military coup d'état toppled SirDawda Kairaba Jawara's People's Progressive Party (PPP) government,thereby bucking the post-1989 Sub-Saharan African trend away fromauthoritarianism toward multiparty politics (Edie, 2000). On July 22,1994, The Gambia National Army led by Lieutenant Yahya Jammehoverthrew the Jawara-led PPP government that had been in power forthree decades. The immediate issues, which seemed to have sparked thecoup d'état, surrounded grievances within the military with regard tothe appointment of Nigerians to senior command positions, late salarypayments, poor living conditions in the barracks, and displeasure overincreased corruption, especially within the senior ranks of the army(Radel and McPherson 1995; Wiseman 1996). Yahya Jammeh allegedlyhad a personal grievance against President Jawara for transferring himfrom his position as Commander of the Presidential Guard after onlyfour months, and disarming and returning him to the barracks a daybefore the coup (Wiseman 1996).
(Continues...)
Excerpted from DELAYED DEMOCRACY: HOW PRESS FREEDOM COLLAPSED IN THE GAMBIA by Alagi Yorro Jallow. Copyright © 2013 Alagi Yorro Jallow. Excerpted by permission of AuthorHouse.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
"About the title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping rates from Germany to U.S.A.
| Item | 16 to 45 business days | 16 to 45 business days |
|---|---|---|
| First item | US$ 56.97 | US$ 56.97 |
Payment methods
- Bank Wire Transfer
- Check
- Paypal
Store description
Seller's business information
Moluna GmbH
Engberdingdamm 27
Greven, Germany 48268
Terms of sale
Instructions for revocation/
Standard Business Terms and customer information/ data protection declaration
Revocation right for consumers
(A ‘consumer’ is any natural person who concludes a legal transaction which, to an overwhelming extent, cannot be attributed to either his commercial or independent professional activities.)
Instructions for revocation
Revocation right
You have the right to revoke this contract within one month without specifying any reasons.
The revocation period is one month with effect from the day,
-
on which you or a third party nominated by you, which is not the carrier, had taken possession of the products, provided you had ordered one or more products within the scope of a standard order and this/these product/products is/are delivered uniformly;
-
on which you or a third party nominated by you, which is not the carrier, had taken possession of the last product, provided you had ordered several products within the scope of a standard order and these products are delivered separately;
-
on which you or a third party nominated by you, which is not the carrier, had taken possession of the last part delivery or the last unit, provided you had ordered a product, which is delivered in several part deliveries or units;
In order to exercise your revocation right, you must inform us (Moluna GmbH, Engberdingdamm 27, 48268 Greven, Telephone number: 02571/5 69 89 33, Fax number: 02571/5 69 89 30, E-Mail address: abe@moluna.de) of your decision to revoke this contract by means of a clear declaration (e.g. a letter sent via post, fax or email). You can use the enclosed specimen revocation form for this, which however is not mandatory.
In order to safeguard the revocation period, it is sufficient that you send the notification about the exercise of the revocation right before the expiry of the revocation period.
Consequences of the revocation
If you revoke this contract, we shall repay all the payments, which we received from you, including the delivery costs (with the exception of additional costs, which arise from that fact that you selected a form of delivery other than the most reasonable standard delivery offered by us), immediately and at the latest within 14 days from the day on which we received the notification about the revocation of this contract from you. We use the same means of payment, which you had originally used during the original transaction, for this repayment unless expressly agreed otherwise with you; you will not be charged any fees owing to this repayment.
We can refuse the repayment until the products are returned to us or until you have furnished evidence that you have sent the products back to us, depending on whichever is earlier.
You must return or transfer the products to us immediately and, in any case, at the latest within 14 days with effect from the day on which you inform us of the revocation of this contract. The deadline is maintained if you send the products before the expiry of the 14 day deadline.
You bear the direct costs for returning the products.
You must pay for any depreciation of the products only if this depreciation can be attributed to any handling with you that was not necessary for checking the condition, features and functionality of the products.
Criteria for exclusion or expiry
The revocation right is not available for contracts
for delivery of products, which are not prefabricated and for whose manufacturing an individual selection or stipulation by the consumer is important or which are clearly tailored to the personal requirements of the consumer;
for delivery of products, which can spoil quickly or whose use-by date would be exceeded quickly;
for delivery of alcoholic drinks, whose price was agreed at the time of concluding the contract, which however can be delivered 30 days after the conclusion of the contract at the earliest and whose current value depends on the fluctuations in the market, on which the entrepreneur has no influence;
for delivery of newspapers, periodicals or magazines with the exception of subscription contracts.
The revocation right expires prematurely in case of contracts
for delivery of sealed products, which are not suitable for return for reasons of health protection or hygiene if their seal has been removed after the delivery;
for delivery of products if they have been mixed inseparably with other goods after the delivery, owing to their condition;
for delivery of sound or video recording or computer software in a sealed package if the seal has been removed after the delivery.
Specimen - revocation form
(If you wish to revoke the contract, please fill up this form and send it back to us.)
-
To Moluna GmbH, Münsterstr. 105, 48268 Greven, Fax number: 02571/5 69 89 30, Email address: abe@moluna.de :
-
I/we () herewith revoke the contract concluded by me/ us () regarding the purchase of the following products ()/
the provision of the following service () -
Ordered on ()/ received on ()
-
Name of the consumer(s)
-
Address of the consumer(s)
-
Signature of the consumer(s) (only in case of a notification on paper)
-
Date
(*) Cross out the incorrect option.
Standard Business Terms and customer information / data protection declaration
I. Standard business terms
§ 1 Basic provisions
(1) The following terms and conditions of business apply for all contracts concluded with us as the supplier (Moluna GmbH) via the websites AbeBooks and/or ZVAB. Unless otherwise agreed, the inclusion of your own terms and conditions is explicitly rejected.
(2) A ‘consumer’ in the sense of the following regulations is every natural person who concludes a legal transaction which, to an overwhelming extent, cannot be attributed to either his commercial or independent professional activities. The term ‘businessman’ refers to every natural person, legal person or legally responsible partnership that concludes a legal transaction in pursuance of his/its independent professional or commercial activity.
§ 2 Conclusion of the contract
(1) The subject-matter of the contract is the selling of products .
(2) If an article is placed by us with AbeBooks or ZVAB, the activation of the page on AbeBooks or ZVAB shall involve the binding offer to conclude a contract under the terms and conditions contained in the article page.
(3) The contract shall become effective via the online shopping cart system as follows:
The products intended for purchase are moved to the "shopping cart". You can select the "Shopping Cart" using the appropriate buttons on the navigation bar and make changes there at any time.
After calling up the “Checkout” page and entering the required personal data and payment and shipping conditions, all order information is then displayed again on the order summary page.
Before submitting the order, you have the ability once more to review or change any information here (you may also use the "back" button on the Internet browser), or to cancel the purchase.
By clicking the “Buy now” button to submit the order, you declare your legally binding acceptance of the order which makes the contract effective.
(4) The execution of the order and the sending of all the details necessitated by the conclusion of the contract take place via e-mail, in a partially-automated manner. Consequently, you have to ensure that the e-mail address that you have deposited with us is the correct one, and that the receipt of the respective e-mails is guaranteed. In particular, you have to ensure that the respective e-mails are not blocked by a SPAM filter.
§ 3 Right of retention, reservation of proprietary rights
(1) You can only exercise a right of retention if the situation in question involves claims arising from the same contractual relationship.
(2) The goods remain our property until the purchase price is paid in full.
(3) If you are a businessman, the following conditions also apply:
a) We retain ownership of the goods until all the claims arising from the ongoing business relationship have been settled in full. The goods subject to retention of title may not be pledged or transferred by way of security before ownership of the said goods changes hands.
b) You can re-sell the goods within the framework of an orderly transaction. In this regard, you hereby cede all the claims amounting to the magnitude of the billing amount that accrue to you as a result of the re-selling operation to us, and we accept the cession. Furthermore, you are authorised to collect the claim in question. However, insofar as you do not discharge your payment obligations in an orderly fashion, we reserve the right to collect the claim ourselves.
c) In a situation involving the combination and amalgamation of the goods subject to retention of title, we acquire co-ownership of the newly-formed item. This co-ownership corresponds to the ratio that exists between the invoice value of the goods subject to retention of title and the other processed items at the time of processing.
d) If you make a request of this nature, we shall be obligated to release the securities that are due to us, to the extent that the realisable value of our securities exceeds the claim to be secured by more than 10%. We are responsible for selecting the securities to be released.
§ 4 Warranty
(1) The statutory warranty rights are applicable.
(2) As a consumer, you are requested to promptly check the product for completeness, visible defects and transport damage as soon as it is delivered, and promptly disclose your complaints to us and the shipping company in writing. Even if you do not comply with this request, it shall have no effect on your legal warranty claims.
(3) If a characteristic of the goods deviates from the objective requirements, the deviation shall only be deemed to be agreed if you were informed of the same by us before submitting the contractual declaration and the deviation was expressly and separately agreed between the contracting parties.
(4)
Insofar as you are an entrepreneur, the following shall apply in deviation from the above warranty provisions:
a) Only our own specifications and the manufacturer's product description shall be deemed agreed as the quality of the goods, but not other advertising, public promotions and statements by the manufacturer.
b) In the event of defects, we shall, at our discretion, provide warranty by rectification of the defect or subsequent delivery. If the rectification of defects fails, you may, at your option, demand a reduction in price or withdraw from the contract. The rectification of defects shall be deemed to have failed after a second unsuccessful attempt, unless the nature of the goods or the defect or other circumstances indicate otherwise. In the event of rectification of defects, we shall not be obliged to bear the increased costs arising from the transport of the goods to a place other than the place of performance, unless such transport is in accordance with the intended use of the goods.
c) The warranty period shall be one year from delivery of the goods. The shortening of the period shall not apply
- for culpable damage attributable to us arising from injury to life, limb or health and for other damage caused intentionally or by gross negligence;
- insofar as we have fraudulently concealed the defect or have assumed a guarantee for the quality of the item;
- in the case of items which have been used for a building in accordance with their customary use and have caused its defectiveness;
- in the case of statutory rights of recourse that you may assert against us in connection with rights arising from defects.
§ 5 Choice of law, place of fulfilment, jurisdiction
(1) German law shall apply. This choice of law only applies to customers if it does not result in the revocation of the protection guaranteed by the mandatory provisions of the law of the country in which the respective customer’s usual place of residence is located (benefit-of-the-doubt principle).
(2) If you are not a consumer, but a businessman, a legal entity under public law or an institutional fund governed by public law, our place of business is the place of jurisdiction as well as the place of fulfilment for all services that follow from the business relationships that exist with us. The same condition applies to situations in which you are not associated with a general place of jurisdiction in Germany or the EU, as well as situations in which the place of residence or the usual place of residence is not known at the time of commencement of proceedings. This has no bearing on the capacity to call upon the court associated with another place of jurisdiction.
(3) The provisions of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods are explicitly inapplicable.
II. Customer information
- Identity of the seller
Moluna GmbH
Engberdingdamm 27
48268 Greven
Germany
Telephone: 02571/5698933
E-Mail: abe@moluna.de
- Information regarding the conclusion of the contract
The technical steps associated with the conclusion of the contract, the contract conclusion itself and the correction options are executed in accordance to the regulations "conclusion of the contract" in our standard business terms (part I.).
- Contractual language, saving the text of the contract
3.1 Contract language shall be English.
3.2 The complete text of the contract is not saved with us. Before the order is sent, the contract data can be printed out or electronically saved using the browser’s print function. After the order is received by us, the order data, the legally-mandated details related to distance selling contracts and the standard business terms are re-sent to you via e-mail.
- Main features of the product or service
The key features of the goods and/or services can be found in the respective quote.
- Prices and payment arrangements
5.1 The prices mentioned in the respective offers represent total prices, as do the shipping costs. They include all the price components, including all the incidental taxes.
5.2 The dispatch costs that are incurred are not included in the purchase price. They can be viewed by clicking the appropriate button on our website or in the respective quote, are shown separately over the course of the order transaction and must additionally be borne by you, insofar as free delivery is not confirmed.
5.3 The payment methods that are available to you are shown by clicking the appropriate button on our website or are disclosed in the respective quote.
5.4 Unless otherwise specified for the respective payment methods, the payment claims arising from the contract that has been concluded become payable immediately.
- Delivery conditions
6.1 The delivery conditions, delivery date and existing supply restrictions, if applicable, can be found by clicking the appropriate button on our website or in the respective quote.
Unless a different period is specified in the item description or our delivery conditions, the goods are delivered within 3-5 days after the conclusion of the contract (in case an advance payment has been agreed upon, after the payment authorisation).
6.2 If you are a consumer, the following is statutorily regulated: The risk of the sold item accidentally being destroyed or degraded during shipping only passes over to you when the item in question is delivered, regardless of whether or not the shipping operation is insured. This condition does not apply if you have independently commissioned a transport company that has not been specified by us or a person who has otherwise been appointed to execute the shipping operation.
If you are a businessman, the delivery and shipping operations take place at your own risk.
- Statutory warranty right
Liability for defects is governed by the “Warranty” provisions in our General Terms and Conditions of Business (Part I).
last update: 01.01.2022
Data protection declaration
Unless stated otherwise below, the provision of your personal data is neither legally nor contractually obligatory, nor required for conclusion of a contract. You are not obliged to provide your data. Not providing it will have no consequences. This only applies as long as the processing procedures below do not state otherwise.
“Personal data” is any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person.
Responsible person
Contact us at any time. The contact details of the person responsible for data processing can be found in our legal notice.
Collection, processing, and transfer of personal data in orders
When you submit an order we only collect and use your personal data insofar as this is necessary for the fulfilment and handling of your order as well as processing of your queries. The provision of data is necessary for conclusion of a contract. Failure to provide it will prevent the conclusion of any contract. The processing will occur on the basis of Article 6(1) b) GDPR and is required for the fulfilment of a contract with you.
Your data is transferred here for example to the shipping companies and dropshipping providers, payment service providers, service providers for handling the order and IT service providers that you have selected. We will comply strictly with legal requirements in every case. The scope of data transmission is restricted to a minimum.
Duration of storage
After contractual processing has been completed, the data is initially stored for the duration of the warranty period, then in accordance with the retention periods prescribed by law, especially tax and commercial law, and then deleted after the period has elapsed, unless you have agreed to further processing and use.
Rights of the affected person
If the legal requirements are fulfilled, you have the following rights according to art. 15 to 20 GDPR: Right to information, correction, deletion, restriction of processing, data portability. You also have a right of objection against processing based on art. 6 (1) GDPR, and to processing for the purposes of direct marketing, according to art. 21 (1) GDPR.
Right to complain to the regulatory authority
You have the right to complain to the regulatory authority according to art. 77 GDPR if you believe that your data is not being processed legally.
Right to object
If the data processing outlined here is based on our legitimate interests in accordance with Article 6(1)f) GDPR, you have the right for reasons arising from your particular situation to object at any time to the processing of your data with future effect.
If the objection is successful, we will no longer process the personal data, unless we can demonstrate compelling legitimate grounds for the processing that outweigh your interests or rights and freedoms, or the processing is intended for the assertion, exercise or defence of legal claims.
last update: 10.01.2022