Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science | A Reappraisal of the Function of Philosophy from Regius to 's Gravesande (1640-1750)

Andrea Strazzoni

ISBN 10: 3110568284 / ISBN 13: 9783110568288

Published by De Gruyter, 2020

About this Item

Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science | A Reappraisal of the Function of Philosophy from Regius to 's Gravesande (1640-1750) | Andrea Strazzoni | Taschenbuch | IX | Englisch | 2020 | De Gruyter | EAN 9783110568288 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, De Gruyter GmbH, Genthiner Str. 13, 10785 Berlin, productsafety[at]degruyterbrill[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu.

Seller Inventory # 118725038

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science | A Reappraisal of the Function of Philosophy from Regius to 's Gravesande (1640-1750)
• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Publication Date: 2020
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 3110568284
• ISBN 13: 9783110568288
• Binding: Taschenbuch
• Condition: Neu
• Dimensions: 230W x 155H x 15D millimeters 230 millimeters width by 155 millimeters height by 15 millimeters depth
• Weight: 386 grams
• Seller catalogs:
  • Bücher

About this title

Synopsis

How did the relations between philosophy and science evolve during the 17th and the 18th century? This book analyzes this issue by considering the history of Cartesianism in Dutch universities, as well as its legacy in the 18th century. It takes into account the ways in which the disciplines of logic and metaphysics became functional to the justification and reflection on the conceptual premises and the methods of natural philosophy, changing their traditional roles as art of reasoning and as science of being. This transformation took place as a result of two factors. First, logic and metaphysics (which included rational theology) were used to grant the status of indubitable knowledge of natural philosophy. Second, the debates internal to Cartesianism, as well as the emergence of alternative philosophical world-views (such as those of Hobbes, Spinoza, the experimental science and Newtonianism) progressively deprived such disciplines of their foundational function, and they started to become forms of reflection over given scientific practices, either Cartesian, experimental, or Newtonian.

About the Author

Andrea Strazzoni, University of Erfurt.