Endocellular Selection: Evolution without Darwin

Darwinism is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated by the academic community. Not only was Darwin wrong – random events don’t build functional codes and natural selection is a circular argument (survival of the fittest; it is the fit that survive), there is no definition of “fit,” and circular arguments are meaningless. Moreover, Darwin was a racist, a champion of eugenics, and he believed men to be superior to women in every way. Organisms alter their own DNA in preparation for the next generation and there is nothing random about it. Educators who continue to preach the Darwinian model are, quite simply, lying to their students. In Endocellular Selection: Evolution without Darwin, and the companion volume, What Darwin and Dawkins didn’t Know, I present scientific studies pointing to the real origin of species.
There are two concepts Charles Darwin presented to the world over 170 years ago, neither of which has been scientifically verified. The first is the concept of random mutations, or alterations to the genetic code, that accumulate, and, over time, result in the creation of new species. There is no science available that indicates how random acts can create codes, without researcher interference, let along the complex DNA code and all the other enzymes, etc. that support it.
The second concept is natural selection and the belief that nature can pick and choose a specific sequence of the genetic code thus leading to the survival of the fittest. This sound like a good idea, that is, the survival of the fittest means it is the fit who survive. However, there is no definition of what it means to be “fit,” along with the fact this is a circular argument, not allowed in science; it is meaningless. These two concepts, neither of which has been verified by materialistic science (math, physics, and chemistry), are accepted as scientific fact by the academic community. The reasons for this are twofold. First, the Myth of Darwin has been told over and over again, in textbook after textbook, implying it is scientific fact without critical analysis. The second is political and the need to remove any suggestion of an energy guiding the universe and the development of life within; there is a fear of returning to deities and demons.
Dr. Rush takes the reader through the research and presents the real science for the origin of species. Basically, through endocellular selection, cells alter their coding in response to environmental issues. Moreover, lifeforms also get new information through symbiosis and hybridization. Lifeforms are not at the mercy of nature; they think and decide in order to stay ahead of Nature and anticipate the future. Life’s survival depends on the cell’s ability to alter itself, not on chance happenings, that is, random mutations and natural selection. Nature is information only; the cell has to decide what to do with it.