Evidence for Linguistic Relativity (Volume 198)

Dirven, R

ISBN 10: 9027237050 / ISBN 13: 9789027237057

Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000

About this Item

Volume 198. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,550grams, ISBN:9027237050.

Seller Inventory # 5559525

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Evidence for Linguistic Relativity (Volume 198)
• Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
• Publication Date: 2000
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 9027237050
• ISBN 13: 9789027237057
• Binding: Hardcover
• Condition: Good
• Weight: 550 grams
• Seller catalogs:
  • Language & Linguistics

About this title

Synopsis

This volume has arisen from the 26th International LAUD Symposium on “Humboldt and Whorf Revisited. Universal and Culture-Specific Conceptualizations in Grammar and Lexis”. While contrasting two or more languages, the papers in this volume either provide empirical evidence confirming hypotheses related to linguistic relativity, or deal with methodological issues of empirical research.These new approaches to Whorf’s hypotheses do not focus on mere theorizing but provide more and more empirical evidence gathered over the last years. They prove in a very sophisticated way that Whorf’s ideas were very lucid ones, even if Whorf’s insights were framed in a terminology which lacked the flexibility of linguistic categories developed over the last quarter of this century, especially in cognitive linguistics. To date, there is sufficient proof to claim that linguistic relativity is indeed a vital issue, and the current volume confirms a more general trend for rehabilitating Whorf’s theory complex and also offers evidence for it. It contains articles written by scholars from various fields of linguistics including phonology, psycholinguistics, language acquisition, historical linguistics, anthropological linguistics and (cross-)cultural semantics, which all contribute to a re-evaluation and partial reformulation of Whorf’s thinking.