Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment | United States Supreme Court cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses, Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, United States Congress, Law

Frederic P. Miller (u. a.)

ISBN 10: 6130628196 / ISBN 13: 9786130628192

Published by OmniScriptum, 2026

About this Item

Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment | United States Supreme Court cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses, Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, United States Congress, Law | Frederic P. Miller (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2026 | OmniScriptum | EAN 9786130628192 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.

Seller Inventory # 113235442

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment | United States Supreme Court cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses, Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, United States Congress, Law
• Publisher: OmniScriptum
• Publication Date: 2026
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 6130628196
• ISBN 13: 9786130628192
• Binding: Taschenbuch
• Condition: Neu
• Dimensions: 220W x 150H x 15D millimeters 220 millimeters width by 150 millimeters height by 15 millimeters depth
• Weight: 375 grams
• Seller catalogs:
  • Bücher

About this title

Synopsis

Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. The Free Exercise Clause is the accompanying clause with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause together read. “ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof... ”. In 1878, the Supreme Court was first called to interpret the extent of the Free Exercise Clause in Reynolds v. United States, as related to the prosecution of polygamy under federal law. The Supreme Court upheld Mr. Reynolds' conviction for bigamy, deciding that to do otherwise would provide constitutional protection for a gamut of religious beliefs, including those as extreme as human sacrifice. The Court said (at page 162): "Congress cannot pass a law for the government of the Territory which shall prohibit the free exercise of religion. The first amendment to the Constitution expressly forbids such legislation." Of federal territorial laws, the Court said: "Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious beliefs and opinions, they may with practices."