Fully Informed Reasonable Disagreement and Tradition Based Perspectivalism (Paperback)

E.D. Baldwin

ISBN 10: 9042932368 / ISBN 13: 9789042932364

Published by Peeters Publishers, Leuven, 2016

About this Item

Paperback. Apparently, people who are aware of the relevant facts and experiencesin a belief forming situation, sometimes reasonably disagree aboutwhether to believe and why. This study argues that such disagreementsare possible, and that some purportedly fully informed reasonabledisagreements are genuine, including cases involving disagreement aboutwhich beliefs about God are reasonably taken to be properly basic, giventhe facts of religious diversity and cases in which phenomenologicallysimilar religious experiences properly ground a variety of religiousbeliefs. Drawing on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre, it also argues thatTradition-Based Perspectivalism roughly, the view that foundationalbeliefs about what is reasonable to believe and why, are tradition-basedand perspectival in nature, originating in and appropriately groundedonly from the perspective of some tradition of inquiry or other istrue, and that its truth provides additional support for the claim thatfully informed reasonable disagreement actually occurs. Apparently, people who are aware of the relevant facts and experiences in a belief forming situation, sometimes reasonably disagree about whether to believe and why. This study argues that such disagreements are possible, and that some purportedly fully informed reasonable disagreements are genuine, including cases involving disagree Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.

Seller Inventory # 9789042932364

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Fully Informed Reasonable Disagreement and Tradition Based Perspectivalism (Paperback)
• Publisher: Peeters Publishers, Leuven
• Publication Date: 2016
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 9042932368
• ISBN 13: 9789042932364
• Binding: Paperback
• Condition: new

About this title

Synopsis

Apparently, people who are aware of the relevant facts and experiences in a belief forming situation, sometimes reasonably disagree about whether to believe and why. This study argues that such disagreements are possible, and that some purportedly fully informed reasonable disagreements are genuine, including cases involving disagreement about which beliefs about God are reasonably taken to be properly basic, given the facts of religious diversity and cases in which phenomenologically similar religious experiences properly ground a variety of religious beliefs. Drawing on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre, it also argues that Tradition-Based Perspectivalism - roughly, the view that foundational beliefs about what is reasonable to believe and why, are tradition-based and perspectival in nature, originating in and appropriately grounded only from the perspective of some tradition of inquiry or other - is true, and that its truth provides additional support for the claim that fully informed reasonable disagreement actually occurs.