Fuzzy Social Choice Models: Explaining the Government Formation Process (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing) by C. Casey, Peter; B. Gibilisco, Michael; A. Goodman, Carly; Pook, Kelly Nelson; N. Mordeson, John; J. Wierman, Mark; D. Clark, Terry: New (2016)

About this Item

PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 183.

Seller Inventory # 18375054198

Contact seller

Report this item

Bibliographic Details

Title: Fuzzy Social Choice Models: Explaining the Government Formation Process (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing)
Publisher: Springer
Publication Date: 2016
Language: English
ISBN 10: 3319356739
ISBN 13: 9783319356730
Binding: Soft cover
Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

This book explores the extent to which fuzzy set logic can overcome some of the shortcomings of public choice theory, particularly its inability to provide adequate predictive power in empirical studies. Especially in the case of social preferences, public choice theory has failed to produce the set of alternatives from which collective choices are made. The book presents empirical findings achieved by the authors in their efforts to predict the outcome of government formation processes in European parliamentary and semi-presidential systems. Using data from the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP), the authors propose a new approach that reinterprets error in the coding of CMP data as ambiguity in the actual political positions of parties on the policy dimensions being coded. The range of this error establishes parties’ fuzzy preferences. The set of possible outcomes in the process of government formation is then calculated on the basis of both the fuzzy Pareto set and the fuzzy maximal set, and the predictions are compared with those made by two conventional approaches as well as with the government that was actually formed. The comparison shows that, in most cases, the fuzzy approaches outperform their conventional counterparts.

From the Back Cover

This book explores the extent to which fuzzy set logic can overcome some of the shortcomings of public choice theory, particularly its inability to provide adequate predictive power in empirical studies. Especially in the case of social preferences, public choice theory has failed to produce the set of alternatives from which collective choices are made. The book presents empirical findings achieved by the authors in their efforts to predict the outcome of government formation processes in European parliamentary and semi-presidential systems. Using data from the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP), the authors propose a new approach that reinterprets error in the coding of CMP data as ambiguity in the actual political positions of parties on the policy dimensions being coded. The range of this error establishes parties’ fuzzy preferences. The set of possible outcomes in the process of government formation is then calculated on the basis of both the fuzzy Pareto set and the fuzzy maximal set, and the predictions are compared with those made by two conventional approaches as well as with the government that was actually formed. The comparison shows that, in most cases, the fuzzy approaches outperform their conventional counterparts.

.

"About this title" may belong to another edition of this title.