I AM [by] God

Consider the true beginning of all things - How do you get something from nothing?

Isn't that the eternal question?

Now imagine God awaking for the first time, and asking it. Where would that place humanity, or the idea of extraterrestrial life? Where would humanity be -- in terms of finding the answer to a question that seems to be unanswerable?

In this book, the reader gets to ponder things such a primal entity might be thinking. They also get to enjoy the viewpoint -- was it written by, dictate to by, or is it philosophical-political-religious-humor? And see from the point of many who use the bible to subjugate others, possibly perverted.
Whatever. Be warned.
Understand that the rules are clear -- WARNINGS are allowed and when given, free will allows it to be acknowledged, heeded, or ignored.

This book presents a curious aspect of Pascal’s Wager. It views I AM from two vantage points. It also views the idea of scripture as science shrouded in fantasy with a structure that is a blend of pure mathematics and scientific observation at the level which yields the Pyramids and other profound ancient monuments or achievements.

Where are we today -- in 2021 -- was it predicted? And how does this whole prediction/prophecy thing work? At least, how would it work from the viewpoint of an entity that once described itself as "I AM"?

And what about religion and atheism?
We exist.
There had to be a beginning, and before that, there had to be absolutely nothing.
How do you get something from absolutely nothing?
Isn't that the unanswerable question?
Religion says a creator deity -- who is eternal and has no beginning or end -- is the answer.
Atheists often assert that the Universe is eternal and has no beginning or end -- the same answer, with a semantic alteration that substitutes Universe for Creator.

What about Freewill and the idea of predestination?
The Universe is controlled or can be described, by mathematical formulas -- excluding random disruptions, that excludes "Freewill." Unless the "random" are also scripted -- or represents on-off actions/switches designed to keep the script on track. In which case, there is no such thing as random, and Einstein was correct: "God does not play dice with the universe."

Consider a "comedic" element related to Hitler -- those who follow his doctrines would {based on his international bestselling book} be devoutly ant Russian Communist. In which case, they could also be expected to demonstrate fascist qualities.

"I AM" and are you sitting, reading, and pondering -- quite possibly from a perspective, you had not considered?
"I AM" is the identity provided in response to Moses allegedly asking for the name of the one giving him the laws.

"I AM" is seeking the answer to what existed before "I AM" awoke ...
"I AM" addresses the alleged uniqueness of humanity and reveals to intelligent people the purpose of existence.
"I AM" knows that the fools will object and oppose -- but that's as it must be.
Fools do not want to think -- and they do not want others to think.
Moreover, while they have common traits, fools can take many forms as they seek to undermine the purpose of existence.

What are the three possible responses to this book... and to everything in life... and which one describes you?

Read the book; state what you think in the comments or, if you have confidence in your position, open yourself to feedback by posting your thoughts on the discussion group QUORA.
Ask both intelligent and foolish people what they thought of the issues covered.
Ask them which of the three possible responses to life they normally take -- and why?

"I AM" [is] expects the warnings and guidance to be ignored -- thus fulfilling the remaining Revelation prophecy, and dictatinge the outcome of the 2024 election.