Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences): 9 (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, Series Number 9)

Herrigel, Gary

ISBN 10: 052177859X / ISBN 13: 9780521778596

Published by Cambridge University Press, 2000

About this Item

Herrigel challenges the Chandlerian, Gerschenkronian, and Schumpetarian approaches to Germany's economic history. Series Editor(s): Granovetter, Mark. Series: Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Num Pages: 496 pages, 5 maps 14 tables. BIC Classification: 1DFG; KCM; KCZ. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 28. Weight in Grams: 685. . 2000. Revised ed. paperback. . . . .

Seller Inventory # V9780521778596

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences): 9 (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, Series Number 9)
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Publication Date: 2000
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 052177859X
• ISBN 13: 9780521778596
• Binding: Soft cover
• Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

This book is about the way in which industrial production in Germany was conditioned by social, political, and regional factors from the seventeenth century to the present. The argument is distinctive because it pays so much attention to small and medium sized firms, and because it suggests that Germany does not have a single coherent national system of industrial governance. This social constructivist point of view presents a direct challenge to the Gerschenkronian, Schumpetarian, and Chandlerian approaches to Germany's economic history.

From the Back Cover

Germany's rise to industrial might has traditionally been attributed to the development of "organized" capitalism, which is said to encompass large, bureaucratic corporations, a unique system of universal banking, centralized peak associations, and an accommodating state. Gary Herrigel argues that this conceptualization of the sources of German industrial power is highly misleading because it ignores the achievement of a very robust alternative form of capitalism within the boundaries of the German political economy and overestimates the coherence of the national system of industrial governance. The upshot of Herrigel's argument is not only that there were several processes of industrialization that occurred simultaneously in German history, but that there has never been a single boundary between industry and the rest of society and politics in Germany; there have always been several. Theoretically, the book rejects the fundamentally unitary conceptions of industrialization and political economy underlying the Gerschenkronian, Schumpetarian, and Chandlerian principles that shape the traditional organized capitalism research program in the study of the German industrial economy and argues for a more open social constructivist approach.