Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts: 3 (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law)

Elaine Mak

ISBN 10: 1849469873 / ISBN 13: 9781849469876

Published by Hart Publishing, 2015

About this Item

Most items will be dispatched the same or the next working day. A copy that has been read but remains in clean condition. All of the pages are intact and the cover is intact and the spine may show signs of wear. The book may have minor markings which are not specifically mentioned.

Seller Inventory # rev9202972288

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts: 3 (Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law)
• Publisher: Hart Publishing
• Publication Date: 2015
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 1849469873
• ISBN 13: 9781849469876
• Binding: Soft cover
• Condition: Good
• Weight: 358.3 grams

About this title

Synopsis

Why do judges study legal sources that originated outside their own national legal system, and how do they use arguments from these sources in deciding domestic cases? Based on interviews with judges, this book presents the inside story of how judges engage with international and comparative law in the highest courts of the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States, France and the Netherlands. A comparative analysis of the views and experiences of the judges clarifies how the decision-making of these Western courts has developed in light of the internationalisation of law and the increased opportunities for transnational judicial communication. While the qualitative analysis reveals the motives that judges claim for using foreign law and the influence of 'globalist' and 'localist' approaches to judging, the author also finds suggestions of a convergence of practices between the courts that are the subject of this study. This empirical analysis is complemented by a constitutional-theoretical inquiry into the procedural and substantive factors of legal evolution, which enable or constrain the development and possible convergence of highest courts' practices. The two strands of the analysis are connected in a final contextual reflection on the future development of the role of Western highest courts.

About the Author

Elaine Mak is Professor of Empirical Study of Public Law, in particular of Rule-of-Law Institutions, at the Erasmus University Rotterdam.