Maintaining the Wing? An Analysis of the Changes Implemented in Aircraft Maintenance as a Result of the Chief's Logistics Review (Paperback or Softback)

Throughout its history the United States Air Forces has fluctuate between centralized and decentralized control of aircraft maintenance. In 1999, the Air Force Chief of Staff directed a study that resulted in the latest shift. This most recent attempt at organizational change placed all aircraft maintenance functions in Air Force wings under the centralized control of a single maintenance group commander. This transformation affected thousands of airmen and provides an excellent opportunity to analyze a substantial organizational change within the hierarchical structure of the United States Air Force. This paper analyzes the processes that Air Force leaders used to determine the necessity for this change, the tools they employed to establish the implementation of the changes they directed, and the methods utilized to ensure the longevity of the transformation efforts. To accomplish this the paper compares actions taken by Air Force leaders to the models offered by some of the leading experts in the field of organizational change and management and offers recommendations for improving future change efforts within the Air Force.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.