How a state's highest court weighs in on constitutional change
This nonfiction work explains how Rhode Island’s Supreme Court advised the Senate about the legality of calling a constitutional convention. It traces the idea that judges’ opinions in advisory questions are persuasive but not binding, and it places the Rhode Island approach in a broader U.S. and English context. The text gathers legal arguments, historical notes, and practical questions about how a constitution can be amended.
- Learn why the constitution’s own amendment process matters and how it is designed to prompt careful, deliberate action.
- See how other states and English precedents influence the interpretation of advisory opinions.
- Explore the sequence of questions the General Assembly posed and how the court answered them.
- Discover how this discussion affects the relationship between the people, the legislature, and the judiciary.
Ideal for readers interested in constitutional history, Rhode Island law, and the dynamics of legislative and judicial roles during constitutional change.