Naturalism and Our Knowledge of Reality: Testing Religious Truth-claims (Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies)

Smith, R. Scott

ISBN 10: 1409434869 / ISBN 13: 9781409434863

Published by Routledge, 2012

About this Item

Philosophical naturalism is taken to be the preferred and reigning epistemology and metaphysics that underwrites many ideas and knowledge claims. But what if we cannot know reality on that basis? What if the institution of science is threatened by its reliance on naturalism? The author argues that we cannot know reality on the basis of naturalism. Series Editor(s): Astley, Revd Jeff; Beckford, Professor James A.; Brummer, Mr. Richard; Brummer, Professor Vincent; Fiddes, Professor Paul S.; Gorringe, Professor T. J.; Grenz, Mr. Stanley J.; Hutch, Mr. Richard; Jasper, Dr. David. Series: Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies. Num Pages: 254 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: HRAM3. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 239 x 162 x 22. Weight in Grams: 624. . 2012. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Seller Inventory # V9781409434863

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Naturalism and Our Knowledge of Reality: Testing Religious Truth-claims (Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies)
• Publisher: Routledge
• Publication Date: 2012
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 1409434869
• ISBN 13: 9781409434863
• Binding: Hardcover
• Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

Philosophical naturalism is taken to be the preferred and reigning epistemology and metaphysics that underwrites many ideas and knowledge claims. But what if we cannot know reality on that basis? What if the institution of science is threatened by its reliance on naturalism? R. Scott Smith argues in a fresh way that we cannot know reality on the basis of naturalism. Moreover, the "fact-value" split has failed to serve our interests of wanting to know reality. The author provocatively argues that since we can know reality, it must be due to a non-naturalistic ontology, best explained by the fact that human knowers are made and designed by God. The book offers fresh implications for the testing of religious truth-claims, science, ethics, education, and public policy. Consequently, naturalism and the fact-value split are shown to be false, and Christian theism is shown to be true.

About the Author

R.Scott Smith has written many articles and a monograph on Virtue Ethics. He specialises in ethics, phenomenology, philosophy of religion, and constructivism (especially in postmodernism, naturalism, and philosophical theology, including the emerging church as a practical extension). He teaches on these themes, including a graduate philosophy of religion class on naturalism, postmodernism, and constructivism.