Non-Violent Coercion: A Study in Methods of Social Pressure

"Non-Violent Coercion; A Study in Methods of Social Pressure" is a foundational sociological and political study exploring the history and efficacy of passive resistance and non-violent action. Clarence Marsh Case examines the various ways in which social groups exert pressure without resorting to physical force, tracing the evolution of these methods from religious movements to modern political strategies.

The text provides a comprehensive analysis of non-violence, distinguishing between its diverse forms such as non-resistance, passive resistance, and non-violent coercion. Case evaluates the psychological and social underpinnings of these tactics, drawing on historical examples ranging from the early Christian Church and the Quakers to the strike actions of organized labor and systemic boycotts. By analyzing the work of influential figures and movements, the author situates non-violence as a powerful instrument for social change and collective bargaining.

This scholarly investigation serves as an essential resource for those interested in the history of peace movements, sociological theory, and the dynamics of social conflict. "Non-Violent Coercion; A Study in Methods of Social Pressure" remains a significant contribution to the understanding of how organized, non-injurious pressure can transform societal structures and influence political outcomes.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.