Out of sight, out of mind? | The need for a functional approach to jurisdiction under the ECHR regarding the right to return of children of Foreign Terrorist Fighters detained in Northeast Syria

Benjamin Scholz

ISBN 10: 338911534X / ISBN 13: 9783389115343

Published by GRIN Verlag, 2025

About this Item

Out of sight, out of mind? | The need for a functional approach to jurisdiction under the ECHR regarding the right to return of children of Foreign Terrorist Fighters detained in Northeast Syria | Benjamin Scholz | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2025 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783389115343 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

Seller Inventory # 131948496

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Out of sight, out of mind? | The need for a functional approach to jurisdiction under the ECHR regarding the right to return of children of Foreign Terrorist Fighters detained in Northeast Syria
• Publisher: GRIN Verlag
• Publication Date: 2025
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 338911534X
• ISBN 13: 9783389115343
• Binding: Taschenbuch
• Condition: Neu
• Dimensions: 210W x 148H x 5D millimeters 210 millimeters width by 148 millimeters height by 5 millimeters depth
• Weight: 96 grams
• Seller catalogs:
  • Bücher

About this title

Synopsis

Master's Thesis from the year 2023 in the subject Law - European and International Law, Intellectual Properties, grade: 8,0, Leiden University (Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies), language: English, abstract: Thousands of children of different nationality live in the prison-like camps al-Hol and al-Roj in Northeast Syria which are controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a non-State armed group. An estimated three dozen of countries have been engaged in the return of their detained nationals since 2019. The unwillingness of certain States, particularly those bound by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and/or EU law, to repatriate children may be explained by obligations related to family reunification under Article 8 of the ECHR and under EU Directive 2004/38/EC. These obligations would extend to the children's parents who States consider a threat to national security. This is particularly problematic since the SDF do not allow repatriation of children without their parents. A case was brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) by applicants, acting on behalf of their French daughters and grandchildren held in the camps. The Court found France's jurisdiction to be established only regarding the right to return. This thesis focusses on the right to return and Article 3 § 2 of Protocol of No. 4 to the Convention, which is of particular interest given the scarcity of case law on it and its limited material scope. It argues for a functional approach to jurisdiction with certain limitations in order to address the question of extraterritorial applicability of the right to return of children under Article 3 § 2 of Protocol No. 4. This newly developed and proposed "factual and legal nexus" doctrine would, with slight adjustments, also be applicable to other Convention rights, in particular the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment (Article 3 of the ECHR).