How Policy Shapes Politics: Rights, Courts, Litigation, and the Struggle Over Injury Compensation (Studies in Postwar American Political Development)

Barnes, Jeb E.

ISBN 10: 0199756112 / ISBN 13: 9780199756117

Published by OUP USA, 2015

About this Item

Comparing judicialized and bureaucratized injury compensation policies, Jeb Barnes and Thomas F. Burke conclude that litigation divides interests between victims and villains and winners and losers, and so creates a comparatively fractious, chaotic politics. Series: Studies in Postwar American Political Development. Num Pages: 272 pages, illustrations. BIC Classification: 1KBB; LNAC14. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 244 x 158 x 24. Weight in Grams: 492. . 2015. Illustrated. hardcover. . . . .

Seller Inventory # V9780199756117

Bibliographic Details

• Title: How Policy Shapes Politics: Rights, Courts, Litigation, and the Struggle Over Injury Compensation (Studies in Postwar American Political Development)
• Publisher: OUP USA
• Publication Date: 2015
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0199756112
• ISBN 13: 9780199756117
• Binding: Hardcover
• Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

Judicialization, juridification, legalization-whatever terms they use, scholars, commentators and citizens are fascinated by what one book has called "The Global Rise of Judicial Power" and seek to understand its implications for politics and society. In How Policy Shapes Politics, Jeb Barnes and Thomas F. Burke find that the turn to courts, litigation, and legal rights can have powerful political consequences.

Barnes and Burke analyze the field of injury compensation in the United States, in which judicialized policies operate side-by-side with bureaucratized social insurance programs. They conclude that litigation, by dividing social interests into victims and villains, winners and losers, generates a fractious, chaotic politics in which even seeming allies-business and professional groups on one side, injured victims on the other-can become divided amongst themselves. By contrast, social insurance programs that compensate for injury bring social interests together, narrowing the scope of conflict and over time producing a more technocratic politics.

Policy does, in fact, create politics. But only by comparing the political trajectories of different types of policies -- some more court-centered, others less so -- can we understand the consequences of arguably one of the most significant developments in post-World War II government, the increasingly prominent role of courts, litigation, and legal rights in politics.

About the Author

Jeb Barnes is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Southern California. A former litigator and research fellow with the Robert Wood Johnson Scholars in Health Policy Program, he is the author of Overruled? Legislative Overrides, Pluralism and Contemporary Court-Congress Relations and Dust-Up: Asbestos Litigation and the Failure of Commonsense Policy Reform; the co-author with Nicholas Weller of Finding Pathways: Mixed-Method Research for Studying Causal Pathways; and the co-editor with Mark Miller of Making Policy, Making Law: An Interbranch Perspective.

Thomas F. Burke is Professor of Political Science at Wellesley College. He has been a visiting professor at Harvard and at the University of California-Berkeley, and a research fellow at the Brookings Institution and with the Robert Wood Johnson Scholars in Health Policy Program. He is the co-author with Lief Carter of Reason in Law and the author of Lawyers, Lawsuits and Legal Rights.