Political Philosophy and Rhetoric: A Study of the Origins of American Party Politics (Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics)

Zvesper, John

ISBN 10: 0521213231 / ISBN 13: 9780521213233

Published by Cambridge University Press, 1977

About this Item

A copy that has been read, remains in good condition. All pages are intact, and the cover is intact. The spine and cover show signs of wear. Pages can include notes and highlighting and show signs of wear, and the copy can include "From the library of" labels or previous owner inscriptions. 100% GUARANTEE! Shipped with delivery confirmation, if you're not satisfied with purchase please return item! Ships via media mail.

Seller Inventory # OTV.0521213231.G

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Political Philosophy and Rhetoric: A Study of the Origins of American Party Politics (Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics)
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Publication Date: 1977
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0521213231
• ISBN 13: 9780521213233
• Binding: Hardcover
• Condition: good

About this title

Synopsis

This book analyses the origins of modern party politics in America. Dr Zvesper argues that the partisan conflict between Federalists and Republicans in the 1790s was not merely an interesting historical sequel to the American Revolution and the framing of the Constitution, but was a confrontation of two of the fundamental alternatives of modern political philosophy. Consideration of this fact, along with evidence of the class structure of American society, is then used to explain why the Republican party was the natural superior in the dispute with Federalism, and why Republican philosophy and rhetoric have been so essential to American politics ever since.

Book Description

This book analyses the origins of modern party politics in America. Dr Zvesper argues that the partisan conflict between Federalists and Republicans in the 1790s was not merely an interesting historical sequel to the American Revolution and the framing of the Constitution, but was a confrontation of two of the fundamental alternatives of modern political philosophy.