The Pretribulation Rapture Doctrine and the Progressive Dispensational System : Are They Compatible?

John A. Alifano

ISBN 10: 1581122241 / ISBN 13: 9781581122244

Published by Dissertation.Com Mai 2004, 2004

About this Item

Neuware - This thesis argues that progressive dispensationalism cannot integrate the pretribulation rapture doctrine into its reconstructed dispensational system on any basis of theological distinctiveness between the church and Israel. This will be accomplished by first setting forth the theological systems of the three major forms of dispensationalism that have existed during its history, namely, classical, revised, and progressive dispensationalism, and second, by showing that each of three kinds of theological distinctiveness, namely, anthropological, soteriological, and eschatological distinctiveness, are present in the classical and revised systems and therefore these systems can support the rapture's integration, but are not present in the progressive system and therefore this system cannot support the rapture's integration. The thesis closes with an explanation as to why progressive dispensationalism is more compatible with amillennialism than with premillennialism.

Seller Inventory # 9781581122244

Bibliographic Details

• Title: The Pretribulation Rapture Doctrine and the Progressive Dispensational System : Are They Compatible?
• Publisher: Dissertation.Com Mai 2004
• Publication Date: 2004
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 1581122241
• ISBN 13: 9781581122244
• Binding: Taschenbuch
• Condition: Neu
• Dimensions: 246W x 189H x 8D millimeters 246 millimeters width by 189 millimeters height by 8 millimeters depth
• Weight: 294 grams

About this title

Synopsis

This thesis argues that progressive dispensationalism cannot integrate the pretribulation rapture doctrine into its reconstructed dispensational system on any basis of theological distinctiveness between the church and Israel. This will be accomplished by first setting forth the theological systems of the three major forms of dispensationalism that have existed during its history, namely, classical, revised, and progressive dispensationalism, and second, by showing that each of three kinds of theological distinctiveness, namely, anthropological, soteriological, and eschatological distinctiveness, are present in the classical and revised systems and therefore these systems can support the rapture's integration, but are not present in the progressive system and therefore this system cannot support the rapture's integration. The thesis closes with an explanation as to why progressive dispensationalism is more compatible with amillennialism than with premillennialism.